Literature DB >> 22621762

On the modularity of implicit sequence learning: independent acquisition of spatial, symbolic, and manual sequences.

Thomas Goschke1, Annette Bolte.   

Abstract

Learning sequential structures is of fundamental importance for a wide variety of human skills. While it has long been debated whether implicit sequence learning is perceptual or response-based, here we propose an alternative framework that cuts across this dichotomy and assumes that sequence learning rests on associative changes that can occur concurrently in distinct processing systems and support the parallel acquisition of multiple uncorrelated sequences. In three experiments we used a serial search task to test critical predictions of this framework. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that participants learnt uncorrelated sequences of auditory letters and manual responses, as well as sequences of visual letters, spatial locations, and manual responses simultaneously, as indicated by a reliable response time (RT) cost incurred by occasional deviants violating either of the sequences. This RT cost was reliable even when participants showing explicit knowledge were excluded. In Experiment 3 learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences was functionally dissociated: whereas a spatio-motor distractor task disrupted learning of location but not of letter sequences, a phonological distractor task had the reverse effect. The distractor tasks thus did not reduce unspecific attentional resources, but selectively disrupted the formation of sequential associations within spatial and nonspatial processing dimensions. These results support the view that implicit sequence learning rests on experience-dependent changes that can occur in parallel in multiple processing systems involved in spatial attention, object recognition, phonological processing, and manual response selection. The resulting dimension-specific sequence representations support independent predictions of what will appear next, where it will appear, and how one will have to respond to it.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22621762     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  Motor imagery-based skill acquisition disrupted following rTMS of the inferior parietal lobule.

Authors:  Sarah N Kraeutner; Laura T Keeler; Shaun G Boe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Charles H Shea; David L Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

Review 3.  What triggers explicit awareness in implicit sequence learning? Implications from theories of consciousness.

Authors:  Sarah Esser; Clarissa Lustig; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-29

4.  Implicit acoustic sequence learning recruits the hippocampus.

Authors:  Julia Jablonowski; Philipp Taesler; Qiufang Fu; Michael Rose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A neural hallmark of auditory implicit learning is altered in older adults.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Steffi Weinhold; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Rodrigo Quian Quiroga; Jens-Max Hopf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Keeping in step with the young: Chronometric and kinematic data show intact procedural locomotor sequence learning in older adults.

Authors:  Leif Johannsen; Erik Friedgen; Denise Nadine Stephan; Joao Batista; Doreen Schulze; Thea Laurentius; Iring Koch; Leo Cornelius Bollheimer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Marit F L Ruitenberg; Elian de Kleine; Willem B Verwey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The effect of haptic cues on motor and perceptual based implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Dongwon Kim; Brandon J Johnson; R Brent Gillespie; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Intuitive decision making as a gradual process: investigating semantic intuition-based and priming-based decisions with fMRI.

Authors:  Thea Zander; Ninja K Horr; Annette Bolte; Kirsten G Volz
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Order, please! Explicit sequence learning in hybrid search in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Erica Westenberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.