Literature DB >> 22614993

Effects of a brief multimedia psychoeducational intervention on the attitudes and interest of patients with cancer regarding clinical trial participation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Paul B Jacobsen1, Kristen J Wells, Cathy D Meade, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Ji-Hyun Lee, William J Fulp, Jhanelle E Gray, Rachid C Baz, Gregory M Springett, Richard M Levine, Merry-Jennifer Markham, Fred J Schreiber, Thomas H Cartwright, James M Burke, Robert D Siegel, Mokenge P Malafa, Daniel Sullivan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The negative attitudes of patients with cancer regarding clinical trials are an important contributor to low participation rates. This study evaluated whether a brief psychoeducational intervention was effective in improving patients' attitudes as well as their knowledge, self-efficacy for decision making, receptivity to receiving more information, and general willingness to participate in clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 472 adults with cancer who had not been asked previously to participate in a clinical trial were randomly assigned to receive printed educational information about clinical trials or a psychoeducational intervention that provided similar information and also addressed misperceptions and concerns about clinical trials. The primary (attitudes) and secondary outcomes (knowledge, self-efficacy, receptivity, and willingness) were assessed via patient self-report before random assignment and 7 to 28 days later.
RESULTS: Patients who received the psychoeducational intervention showed more positive attitudes toward clinical trials (P = .016) and greater willingness to participate (P = .011) at follow-up than patients who received printed educational information. Evidence of an indirect effect of intervention assignment on willingness to participate (estimated at 0.168; 95% CI, 0.088 to 0.248) suggested that the benefits of psychoeducation on willingness to participate were explained by the positive impact of psychoeducation on attitudes toward clinical trials.
CONCLUSION: A brief psychoeducational intervention can improve the attitudes of patients with cancer toward clinical trials and thereby increase their willingness to participate in clinical trials. Findings support conducting additional research to evaluate effects of this intervention on quality of decision making and rates of participation among patients asked to enroll onto therapeutic clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22614993      PMCID: PMC4577714          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  17 in total

Review 1.  Why patients don't take part in cancer clinical trials: an overview of the literature.

Authors:  K Cox; J McGarry
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; E Visser-Pol; G H Leenhouts; M J Muller; A C van der Schot; F S van Dam; R B Keus; C C Koning; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; J A van Dongen; R Dubbelman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

Authors:  P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; P Tugwell; G A Wells; T Elmslie; E Jolly; G Hollingworth; R McPherson; H Bunn; I Graham; E Drake
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1998-03

Review 5.  Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors.

Authors:  Edward J Mills; Dugald Seely; Beth Rachlis; Lauren Griffith; Ping Wu; Kumanan Wilson; Peter Ellis; James R Wright
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Development of a cancer clinical trials multi-media intervention: clinical trials: are they right for you?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cathy D Meade; Michelle Fletcher; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Heather Jim; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-04-22

7.  Self-administered stress management training in patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mindy M Krischer; Ping Xu; Cathy D Meade; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to cancer trial participation.

Authors:  Debra Fayter; Catriona McDaid; Alison Eastwood
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei Du; Darlene Mood; Shirish Gadgeel; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Charles Sawyers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  23 in total

1.  Science in the Heartland: Exploring determinants of offering cancer clinical trials in rural-serving community urology practices.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; Mugur Geana; Christine B Mackay; Deborah J Moon; Jessie Gills; Andrew Zganjar; Gayle Brekke; J Brantley Thrasher; Tomas L Griebling
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Educating Hispanics About Clinical Trials and Biobanking.

Authors:  M Lizette Rangel; Natalia I Heredia; Belinda Reininger; Lorna McNeill; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment in Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Lauren M Hamel; Louis A Penner; Terrance L Albrecht; Elisabeth Heath; Clement K Gwede; Susan Eggly
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.302

4.  Patient income level and cancer clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Kathy S Albain; Carol M Moinpour; Judith A Petersen; Kenda Burg; John J Crowley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Adapting an Evidence-Based Intervention to Address Targeted Therapy-Related Fatigue in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Authors:  Hanneke Poort; Cathy D Meade; Hans Knoop; Marieke F M Gielissen; Javier Pinilla-Ibarz; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  Attitudinal barriers to participation in oncology clinical trials: factor analysis and correlates of barriers.

Authors:  S Manne; D Kashy; T Albrecht; Y-N Wong; A Lederman Flamm; A B Benson; S M Miller; Linda Fleisher; J Buzaglo; N Roach; M Katz; E Ross; M Collins; D Poole; S Raivitch; D M Miller; T G Kinzy; T Liu; N J Meropol
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Feasibility trial of a Spanish-language multimedia educational intervention.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Jessica McIntyre; Luis E Gonzalez; Ji-Hyun Lee; Kate J Fisher; Paul B Jacobsen; Cathy Meade; Teresita Muñoz-Antonia; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Multimedia psychoeducation for patients with cancer who are eligible for clinical trials: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Charles S Kamen; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Matthew Asare; Charles E Heckler; Joseph J Guido; Jeffrey K Giguere; Kari Gilliland; Jane Jijun Liu; Jodi Geer; Scott E Delacroix; Gary R Morrow; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Decision Aids Can Support Cancer Clinical Trials Decisions: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Marie D Kuzemchak; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Hannah Perkins; Jingxia Liu; Margaret M Byrne
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-08-10

10.  Knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy as predictors of preparedness for oncology clinical trials: a mediational model.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Deborah Kashy; Terrance Albrecht; Yu-Ning Wong; Anne Lederman Flamm; Al B Benson; Suzanne M Miller; Linda Fleisher; Joanne Buzaglo; Nancy Roach; Michael Katz; Eric Ross; Michael Collins; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Dawn M Miller; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva Liu; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.