PURPOSE: To determine the patterns of use of anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Claims from a 5% national Medicare sample and from a nationally representative claims database (Marketscan) from 1998 to 2009 were used. Patients with International Classification of Diseases (ICD), ninth revision, codes indicating breast cancer, ICD and Common Procedural Terminology codes indicating breast surgery, and claims for chemotherapy between 3 months before and 12 months after surgery comprised the study cohort. Chemotherapy was classified as anthracycline-based or taxane-based, and the percentages of use were calculated. Piecewise regression models were used to identify the inflection points in the rates of chemotherapy use. The effect of patient characteristics on receiving different types of chemotherapy was estimated by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 4,458 patients were included in the Medicare cohort and 30,422 in the private insurance cohort. After 2005, a sharp increase in the use of taxane-based chemotherapy and a decline in anthracycline-based chemotherapy was seen. By 2008 in the Medicare cohort, 51% of patients received taxane-based and 32% received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. By the end of 2008, the majority of patients younger than 65 years were also receiving taxane-based chemotherapy. Patients younger than 35 years were less likely to be treated with a taxane-based regimen, whereas patients who underwent 21-gene recurrence score testing and those treated with trastuzumab were more likely to receive taxane-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy has declined, and the majority of patients with breast cancer are instead receiving taxane-based chemotherapy. The potential impact on patient outcomes is unknown.
PURPOSE: To determine the patterns of use of anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Claims from a 5% national Medicare sample and from a nationally representative claims database (Marketscan) from 1998 to 2009 were used. Patients with International Classification of Diseases (ICD), ninth revision, codes indicating breast cancer, ICD and Common Procedural Terminology codes indicating breast surgery, and claims for chemotherapy between 3 months before and 12 months after surgery comprised the study cohort. Chemotherapy was classified as anthracycline-based or taxane-based, and the percentages of use were calculated. Piecewise regression models were used to identify the inflection points in the rates of chemotherapy use. The effect of patient characteristics on receiving different types of chemotherapy was estimated by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 4,458 patients were included in the Medicare cohort and 30,422 in the private insurance cohort. After 2005, a sharp increase in the use of taxane-based chemotherapy and a decline in anthracycline-based chemotherapy was seen. By 2008 in the Medicare cohort, 51% of patients received taxane-based and 32% received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. By the end of 2008, the majority of patients younger than 65 years were also receiving taxane-based chemotherapy. Patients younger than 35 years were less likely to be treated with a taxane-based regimen, whereas patients who underwent 21-gene recurrence score testing and those treated with trastuzumab were more likely to receive taxane-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy has declined, and the majority of patients with breast cancer are instead receiving taxane-based chemotherapy. The potential impact on patient outcomes is unknown.
Authors: Stephen E Jones; Michael A Savin; Frankie Ann Holmes; Joyce A O'Shaughnessy; Joanne L Blum; Svetislava Vukelja; Kristi J McIntyre; John E Pippen; James H Bordelon; Robert Kirby; John Sandbach; William J Hyman; Pankaj Khandelwal; Angel G Negron; Donald A Richards; Stephen P Anthony; Robert G Mennel; Kristi A Boehm; Walter G Meyer; Lina Asmar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dennis Slamon; Wolfgang Eiermann; Nicholas Robert; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Miguel Martin; Michael Press; John Mackey; John Glaspy; Arlene Chan; Marek Pawlicki; Tamas Pinter; Vicente Valero; Mei-Ching Liu; Guido Sauter; Gunter von Minckwitz; Frances Visco; Valerie Bee; Marc Buyse; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Isabelle Tabah-Fisch; Mary-Ann Lindsay; Alessandro Riva; John Crown Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Margot Burnell; Mark N Levine; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Vivien Bramwell; Karen Gelmon; Barbara Walley; Ted Vandenberg; Haji Chalchal; Kathy S Albain; Edith A Perez; Hope Rugo; Kathleen Pritchard; Patti O'Brien; Lois E Shepherd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sharon H Giordano; Zhigang Duan; Yong-Fang Kuo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Jean Freeman; James S Goodwin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Molin Wang; Silvana Martino; Vicky Jones; Edith A Perez; Tom Saphner; Antonio C Wolff; George W Sledge; William C Wood; Nancy E Davidson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc Buyse; George Sledge; James Carmichael; Hans-Joachim Lück; John R Mackey; Jean-Marc Nabholtz; Robert Paridaens; Laura Biganzoli; Jacek Jassem; Marijke Bontenbal; Jacques Bonneterre; Stephen Chan; Gul Atalay Basaran; Patrick Therasse Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mary C Pinder; Zhigang Duan; James S Goodwin; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anthony F Yu; Roy B Mukku; Shivani Verma; Jennifer E Liu; Kevin C Oeffinger; Richard M Steingart; Clifford A Hudis; Chau T Dang Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jan Lankelma; Rafael Fernández Luque; Henk Dekker; Jaap van den Berg; Bob Kooi Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Young Chandler; Jinani C Jayasekera; Clyde B Schechter; Claudine Isaacs; Christopher J Cadham; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Hope S Rugo; Paula Klein; Susan Anitra Melin; Sara A Hurvitz; Michelle E Melisko; Anne Moore; Glen Park; Jules Mitchel; Erika Bågeman; Ralph B D'Agostino; Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve; Laura Esserman; Tessa Cigler Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stacie B Dusetzina; Shellie Ellis; Rachel A Freedman; Rena M Conti; Aaron N Winn; James D Chambers; G Caleb Alexander; Haiden A Huskamp; Nancy L Keating Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Rena M Conti; Arielle C Bernstein; Victoria M Villaflor; Richard L Schilsky; Meredith B Rosenthal; Peter B Bach Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ines Vaz-Luis; Melissa E Hughes; Angel M Cronin; Hope S Rugo; Stephen B Edge; Beverly Moy; Richard L Theriault; Michael J Hassett; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 6.860