BACKGROUND: The publication of results from randomized clinical trials can have a dramatic effect on treatment patterns, but the impact of oral presentations at national scientific meetings is unknown. We investigated the temporal association between the oral presentation of the results from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Study 9344 at the May 1998 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which showed that paclitaxel improves survival of women with lymph node-positive breast cancer, and use of taxane chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: We studied chemotherapy use in 3341 women identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database who were diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in 1994-1999 at age 65 years or older and received adjuvant chemotherapy, as identified through claims data, within 1 year of diagnosis. We assessed the temporal association between the CALBG presentation and taxane use with piecewise regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine which patient characteristics were associated with taxane use. RESULTS: The use of taxanes increased substantially after the CALGB presentation, with absolute rates of taxane use of 5.2% before May 1998 and 23.6% in May 1998 and later. Initially, this increase was confined to patients with lymph node-positive disease (40% of whom were receiving taxanes by the end of 1999), but over time it extended to patients with lymph node-negative disease (15% of whom were receiving taxanes by the end of 1999). In multivariable analysis, patients who were treated in May 1998 or later were statistically significantly more likely to have received a taxane than patients treated before this date (estimated relative risk = 6.84, 95% confidence interval = 5.71 to 8.07). Younger patient age, larger number of lymph nodes involved, higher tumor grade, and larger tumor size were also independently associated with adjuvant taxane use. CONCLUSIONS: The oral presentation of a single study at a national conference was temporally associated with an increase in the use of taxanes for primary breast cancer, even before study publication or Food and Drug Administration approval.
BACKGROUND: The publication of results from randomized clinical trials can have a dramatic effect on treatment patterns, but the impact of oral presentations at national scientific meetings is unknown. We investigated the temporal association between the oral presentation of the results from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Study 9344 at the May 1998 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which showed that paclitaxel improves survival of women with lymph node-positive breast cancer, and use of taxane chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: We studied chemotherapy use in 3341 women identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database who were diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in 1994-1999 at age 65 years or older and received adjuvant chemotherapy, as identified through claims data, within 1 year of diagnosis. We assessed the temporal association between the CALBG presentation and taxane use with piecewise regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine which patient characteristics were associated with taxane use. RESULTS: The use of taxanes increased substantially after the CALGB presentation, with absolute rates of taxane use of 5.2% before May 1998 and 23.6% in May 1998 and later. Initially, this increase was confined to patients with lymph node-positive disease (40% of whom were receiving taxanes by the end of 1999), but over time it extended to patients with lymph node-negative disease (15% of whom were receiving taxanes by the end of 1999). In multivariable analysis, patients who were treated in May 1998 or later were statistically significantly more likely to have received a taxane than patients treated before this date (estimated relative risk = 6.84, 95% confidence interval = 5.71 to 8.07). Younger patient age, larger number of lymph nodes involved, higher tumor grade, and larger tumor size were also independently associated with adjuvant taxane use. CONCLUSIONS: The oral presentation of a single study at a national conference was temporally associated with an increase in the use of taxanes for primary breast cancer, even before study publication or Food and Drug Administration approval.
Authors: Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Tarun K Sarkar; Keith N Ogston; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Ian Smith; Leslie G Walker; Oleg Eremin Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Miguel Martin; Tadeusz Pienkowski; John Mackey; Marek Pawlicki; Jean-Paul Guastalla; Charles Weaver; Eva Tomiak; Taher Al-Tweigeri; Linnea Chap; Eva Juhos; Raymond Guevin; Anthony Howell; Tommy Fornander; John Hainsworth; Robert Coleman; Jeferson Vinholes; Manuel Modiano; Tamas Pinter; Shou C Tang; Bruce Colwell; Catherine Prady; Louise Provencher; David Walde; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure; Judith Hugh; Camille Loret; Matthieu Rupin; Sandra Blitz; Philip Jacobs; Michael Murawsky; Alessandro Riva; Charles Vogel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M V Pilepich; R Caplan; R W Byhardt; C A Lawton; M J Gallagher; J B Mesic; G E Hanks; C T Coughlin; A Porter; W U Shipley; D Grignon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eleftherios P Mamounas; John Bryant; Barry Lembersky; Louis Fehrenbacher; Scot M Sedlacek; Bernard Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; Greg Yothers; Atilla Soran; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pamela R Soulos; James B Yu; Kenneth B Roberts; Ann C Raldow; Jeph Herrin; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sharon H Giordano; Yu-Li Lin; Yong Fang Kuo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; James S Goodwin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Diane Martin; Ruth B Etzioni; William E Barlow; Michael LeBlanc; Scott R Ramsey Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Christopher M Peters; Juan Miguel Jimenez-Andrade; Michael A Kuskowski; Joseph R Ghilardi; Patrick W Mantyh Journal: Brain Res Date: 2007-07-17 Impact factor: 3.252