Literature DB >> 22614682

Normative values in anorectal manometry using microtip technology: a cohort study in 172 subjects.

Jochen Schuld1, Otto Kollmar, Christian Schlüter, Martin K Schilling, Sven Richter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to obtain normative values in resting/squeeze pressure and surface electromyography (s-EMG) in anorectal manometry using microtip technology and to determine the relationship between objective measurable values, gender and age in a cohort with no anorectal disorders.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-two white central European subjects (106 males/66 females) were recruited prior to left colonic or upper rectal surgery and studied by anorectal rapid pull-through manometry with a microtip transducer system and endoanal s-EMG using a bipolar plug electrode. s-EMG patterns were determined as plateau, peak and decrease by a blinded co-investigator. Objective measurable sphincter pressures and s-EMG values were correlated with gender, age and s-EMG patterns.
RESULTS: Squeeze pressure, voluntary pressure as well as s-EMG amplitude and its area under the curve were significantly lower in women compared to men (p < 0.001 each), whereas resting pressure showed no gender differences. s-EMG patterns were strongly influenced by gender. Male patients showed significantly more plateau pattern whereas peak pattern was significantly more often in women. In both genders, the peak pattern was associated with significant higher squeeze pressures. In all measurements, we found considerable inter-individual variations being higher in elder patients. There was no manometric parameter correlating with age.
CONCLUSIONS: Gender is the strongest factor influencing objective measurable manometric data for healthy men and women. There are significant gender differences concerning squeeze patterns. All manometric values should be interpreted in the context of gender and of methodology used. Large prospective cohort studies matched for gender are necessary to clarify the effect of ageing on anal sphincter strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22614682     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1499-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  37 in total

1.  On-line quantitative analysis of surface electromyography of the pelvic floor in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  A S Gee; R S Jones; P Durdey
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Minimum standards of anorectal manometry.

Authors:  S S C Rao; F Azpiroz; N Diamant; P Enck; G Tougas; A Wald
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Epidemiology of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  R D Madoff; J G Williams; P F Caushaj
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Test-retest repeatability of anorectal physiology tests in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A M Ryhammer; S Laurberg; A P Hermann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function.

Authors:  J Rogers; S Laurberg; J J Misiewicz; M M Henry; M Swash
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function.

Authors:  R I Hallan; D E Marzouk; D J Waldron; N R Womack; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Differences in the pressures of canal anal and rectal sensitivity in patients with fecal incontinence, chronic constipation and healthy subjects.

Authors:  C Ciriza-de-Los-Ríos; A Ruiz-de-León-San-Juan; M Díaz-Rubio García; E Tomás-Moros; F García-Durán; T Muñoz-Yagüe; F Canga-Rodríguez-Valcárcel; A Gómez-de-la-Cámara; G Castellano-Tortajada
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Anal canal pressure profile: a reappraisal as determined by rapid pullthrough technique.

Authors:  S M McHugh; N E Diamant
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Effect of aging on anorectal function.

Authors:  J J Bannister; L Abouzekry; N W Read
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of gender on the etiology of fecal incontinence: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary referral center in Turkey.

Authors:  Sena Tokay Tarhan; Özlen Atuğ; Adnan Giral; Neşe İmeryüz
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Guido Basilisco; Allison Malcolm; Tae Hee Lee; Matthew B Hoy; S Mark Scott; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.960

3.  Anorectal manometric parameters are influenced by gender and age in subjects with normal bowel function.

Authors:  Hyang Ran Lee; Seok-Byung Lim; Jeong Yun Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Interpretation of overall colonic transit in defecation disorders in males and females.

Authors:  A Shin; M Camilleri; A Nadeau; S Nullens; J C Rhee; I D Jeong; D D Burton
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.598

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.