OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine combination with capecitabine or erlotinib in unresectable pancreatic cancer to know whether the combination with cytotoxic and target agent has more benefit comparing to combination of cytotoxic agents. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, treated with gemcitabine and capecitabine (GC) or gemcitabine and erlotinib (GE) as first line between October 2006 and July 2010, were reviewed. In GC group, patients were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and capecitabine 1,300 mg/m(2) bid was administered on days 1-14, repeated every 21 days. In GE group, gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m(2) I.V for 30 min on days 1,8,15, and erlotinib was taken orally at 100 mg through days 1-28, repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Response rate was similar, 23.5 % in GE and 21.1 % in GC, but GC had better disease control rate with 73.7 % than GE with 52.9 %. GC also showed longer PFS and OS (5.37 and 14.43 months) than GE (2.63 and 6.23 months) (p = 0.032 for PFS and 0.002 for OS). In toxicity profiles, GC had more hematologic toxicities and GE had more non-hematologic toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The combination with cytotoxic agents seems to have better efficacy and clinical outcome than combination with cytotoxic agent and target agent. The new combination should be developed for the treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.
OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine combination with capecitabine or erlotinib in unresectable pancreatic cancer to know whether the combination with cytotoxic and target agent has more benefit comparing to combination of cytotoxic agents. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, treated with gemcitabine and capecitabine (GC) or gemcitabine and erlotinib (GE) as first line between October 2006 and July 2010, were reviewed. In GC group, patients were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and capecitabine 1,300 mg/m(2) bid was administered on days 1-14, repeated every 21 days. In GE group, gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m(2) I.V for 30 min on days 1,8,15, and erlotinib was taken orally at 100 mg through days 1-28, repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Response rate was similar, 23.5 % in GE and 21.1 % in GC, but GC had better disease control rate with 73.7 % than GE with 52.9 %. GC also showed longer PFS and OS (5.37 and 14.43 months) than GE (2.63 and 6.23 months) (p = 0.032 for PFS and 0.002 for OS). In toxicity profiles, GC had more hematologic toxicities and GE had more non-hematologic toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The combination with cytotoxic agents seems to have better efficacy and clinical outcome than combination with cytotoxic agent and target agent. The new combination should be developed for the treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.
Authors: H Oettle; D Richards; R K Ramanathan; J L van Laethem; M Peeters; M Fuchs; A Zimmermann; W John; D Von Hoff; M Arning; H L Kindler Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-08-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Richard L Schilsky; Donna Bertucci; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Hedy L Kindler; Mark J Ratain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Volker Heinemann; Detlef Quietzsch; Frank Gieseler; Michael Gonnermann; Herbert Schönekäs; Andreas Rost; Horst Neuhaus; Caroline Haag; Michael Clemens; Bernard Heinrich; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Martin Fuchs; Doris Fleckenstein; Wolfgang Gesierich; Dirk Uthgenannt; Hermann Einsele; Axel Holstege; Axel Hinke; Andreas Schalhorn; Ralf Wilkowski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Philip A Philip; Jacqueline Benedetti; Christopher L Corless; Ralph Wong; Eileen M O'Reilly; Patrick J Flynn; Kendrith M Rowland; James N Atkins; Barry C Mirtsching; Saul E Rivkin; Alok A Khorana; Bryan Goldman; Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas H Cartwright; Allen Cohn; Jerry A Varkey; Yin-Miao Chen; Ted P Szatrowski; John V Cox; Joseph J Schulz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jordan D Berlin; Paul Catalano; James P Thomas; John W Kugler; Daniel G Haller; Al Bowen Benson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jae Yun Lim; Jang Ho Cho; Se Joon Lee; Dong Ki Lee; Dong Sup Yoon; Jae Yong Cho Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 4.679