Literature DB >> 17396266

A phase II trial of gemcitabine plus capecitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Byeong-Bae Park1, Joon Oh Park, Hyo Rak Lee, Jeeyun Lee, Dong Wook Choi, Seong-Ho Choi, Jin Seok Heo, Jong Kyun Lee, Kyu Taek Lee, Do Hoon Lim, Young Suk Park, Ho-Yeong Lim, Won Ki Kang, Keunchil Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While gemcitabine (GEM) is widely accepted for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, capecitabine (CAP) has shown single agent activity and promising efficacy in combination with GEM. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of GEM combined with dose escalated 14-day CAP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, we also analyzed the correlation between CA19-9 response and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Patients had advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic chemotherapy other than that given concurrently with radiation therapy, at lease one measurable disease, and adequate organ functions. The patients were treated with GEM 1,000 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and CAP 1,000 mg/m2 twice a day PO on days 1-14, in 21-day cycles.
RESULTS: The objective RR among 45 patients was 40.0% (95% CI; 25.1-54.9), including 1CR (2.2%). The median TTP and OS were 5.4 months (95% CI; 1.8-9.0) and 10.4 months (95% CI; 6.2-14.5), respectively. Patients with >or=25% decline of serum CA19-9 had significantly better outcomes in terms of TTP and OS than those who did not (P < 0.03). The most frequent, grade 3-4, non-hematologic toxicity was hand-foot syndrome (6.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of GEM with dose escalated 14-day CAP is well tolerated and offers encouraging activity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, CA19-9 response correlates well with clinical outcomes in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17396266     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-006-0390-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the efficacy and the toxicity between gemcitabine with capecitabine (GC) and gemcitabine with erlotinib (GE) in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Jeon; Hye-Sung Won; Yoon-Ho Ko; In Seok Lee; Tae Ho Hong; Young Kyoung You; Myung Ah Lee
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  A pilot study on combination of cryosurgery and (125)iodine seed implantation for treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ke-Cheng Xu; Li-Zhi Niu; Yi-Ze Hu; Wei-Bing He; Yi-Song He; Ying-Fei Li; Jian-Sheng Zuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Dose-escalation study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine combined with capecitabine in advanced solid malignancies.

Authors:  Steven Attia; Sherry Morgan-Meadows; Kyle D Holen; Howard H Bailey; Jens C Eickhoff; William R Schelman; Anne M Traynor; Daniel L Mulkerin; Toby C Campbell; Thomas A McFarland; Michael S Huie; James F Cleary; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Dona B Alberti; George Wilding; Glenn Liu
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Capecitabine and Gemcitabine (CapGem, CG, GemCap) for Advanced Pancreatic and Biliary Tract Cancer.

Authors:  Dominic A Solimando; J Aubrey Waddell
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-02

5.  Capecitabine: an evidence-based review of its effectiveness in the treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  David B Smith; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2007-11-30

6.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer: initial experiences.

Authors:  Jae Young Lee; Byung Ihn Choi; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim; Joo Ha Hwang; Se Hyung Kim; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  A Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Jong Gwon Choi; Jae Hong Seo; Sang Cheul Oh; Chul Won Choi; Jun Suk Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  HIFU is safe, effective, and feasible in pancreatic cancer patients: a monocentric retrospective study among 523 patients.

Authors:  Zhouyu Ning; Jing Xie; Qiwen Chen; Chenyue Zhang; Litao Xu; Libin Song; Zhiqiang Meng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.