Literature DB >> 22614036

Effects of imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on reproduction in worker bumble bees (Bombus terrestris).

Ian Laycock1, Kate M Lenthall, Andrew T Barratt, James E Cresswell.   

Abstract

Bumble bees are important pollinators whose populations have declined over recent years, raising widespread concern. One conspicuous threat to bumble bees is their unintended exposure to trace residues of systemic neonicotinoid pesticides, such as imidacloprid, which are ingested when bees forage on the nectar and pollen of treated crops. However, the demographic consequences for bumble bees of exposure to dietary neonicotinoids have yet to be fully established. To determine whether environmentally realistic levels of imidacloprid are capable of making a demographic impact on bumble bees, we exposed queenless microcolonies of worker bumble bees, Bombus terrestris, to a range of dosages of dietary imidacloprid between zero and 125 μg L(-1) and examined the effects on ovary development and fecundity. Microcolonies showed a dose-dependent decline in fecundity, with environmentally realistic dosages in the range of 1 μg L(-1) capable of reducing brood production by one third. In contrast, ovary development was unimpaired by dietary imidacloprid except at the highest dosage. Imidacloprid reduced feeding on both syrup and pollen but, after controlling statistically for dosage, microcolonies that consumed more syrup and pollen produced more brood. We therefore speculate that the detrimental effects of imidacloprid on fecundity emerge principally from nutrient limitation imposed by the failure of individuals to feed. Our findings raise concern about the impact of neonicotinoids on wild bumble bee populations. However, we recognize that to fully evaluate impacts on wild colonies it will be necessary to establish the effect of dietary neonicotinoids on the fecundity of bumble bee queens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22614036     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-012-0927-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of instantaneous rate of population increase and critical-effect estimates in Folsomia candida exposed to four toxicants.

Authors:  Iain N Herbert; Claus Svendsen; Peter K Hankard; David J Spurgeon
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 2.  The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods.

Authors:  Nicolas Desneux; Axel Decourtye; Jean-Marie Delpuech
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  A survey of pesticide residues in pollen loads collected by honey bees in France.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Chauzat; Jean-Paul Faucon; Anne-Claire Martel; Julie Lachaize; Nicolas Cougoule; Michel Aubert
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Convergence of carbohydrate-biased intake targets in caged worker honeybees fed different protein sources.

Authors:  Solomon Z Altaye; Christian W W Pirk; Robin M Crewe; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Neonicotinoid pesticide reduces bumble bee colony growth and queen production.

Authors:  Penelope R Whitehorn; Stephanie O'Connor; Felix L Wackers; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Imidacloprid-induced facilitation of the proboscis extension reflex habituation in the honeybee.

Authors:  M Lambin; C Armengaud; S Raymond; M Gauthier
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.698

Review 7.  Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection.

Authors:  Alfred Elbert; Matthias Haas; Bernd Springer; Wolfgang Thielert; Ralf Nauen
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.845

8.  Ban of DDT and subsequent recovery of Reproduction in bald eagles.

Authors:  J W Grier
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-17       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Reproductive competition in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris: do workers advertise sterility?

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Robert Twele; Wittko Francke; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Multiple routes of pesticide exposure for honey bees living near agricultural fields.

Authors:  Christian H Krupke; Greg J Hunt; Brian D Eitzer; Gladys Andino; Krispn Given
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  62 in total

1.  Comparison of Pesticide Exposure in Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): Implications for Risk Assessments.

Authors:  Angela E Gradish; Jozef van der Steen; Cynthia D Scott-Dupree; Ana R Cabrera; G Christopher Cutler; Dave Goulson; Olaf Klein; David M Lehmann; Johannes Lückmann; Bridget O'Neill; Nigel E Raine; Bibek Sharma; Helen Thompson
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.377

2.  Effects of neonicotinoid insecticide exposure and monofloral diet on nest-founding bumblebee queens.

Authors:  Mar Leza; Kristal M Watrous; Jade Bratu; S Hollis Woodard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Impact of Diflubenzuron on Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Microcolony Development.

Authors:  A A Camp; M A Batres; W C Williams; D M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.377

Review 4.  Agrochemical-induced stress in stingless bees: peculiarities, underlying basis, and challenges.

Authors:  M A P Lima; G F Martins; E E Oliveira; R N C Guedes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Field realistic doses of pesticide imidacloprid reduce bumblebee pollen foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Hannah Feltham; Kirsty Park; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Imidacloprid slows the development of preference for rewarding food sources in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens).

Authors:  Jordan D Phelps; Caroline G Strang; Malgorzata Gbylik-Sikorska; Tomasz Sniegocki; Andrzej Posyniak; David F Sherry
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Sublethal and hormesis effects of imidacloprid on the soybean aphid Aphis glycines.

Authors:  Yanyan Qu; Da Xiao; Jinyu Li; Zhou Chen; Antonio Biondi; Nicolas Desneux; Xiwu Gao; Dunlun Song
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  A meta-analysis comparing the sensitivity of bees to pesticides.

Authors:  Maria Arena; Fabio Sgolastra
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Ecotoxicological effects on the earthworm Eisenia fetida following exposure to soil contaminated with imidacloprid.

Authors:  Qingming Zhang; Baohua Zhang; Caixia Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  The neonicotinoid pesticide, imidacloprid, affects Bombus impatiens (bumblebee) sonication behavior when consumed at doses below the LD50.

Authors:  Callin M Switzer; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.