Literature DB >> 29273854

Imidacloprid slows the development of preference for rewarding food sources in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens).

Jordan D Phelps1, Caroline G Strang2, Malgorzata Gbylik-Sikorska3, Tomasz Sniegocki3, Andrzej Posyniak3, David F Sherry2.   

Abstract

Bee pollination is economically and ecologically vital and recent declines in bee populations are therefore a concern. One possible cause of bee declines is pesticide use. Bumblebees exposed to imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, have been shown to be less efficient foragers and collect less pollen on foraging trips than unexposed bees. We investigated whether bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) chronically exposed to imidacloprid at field-realistic levels of 2.6 and 10 ppb showed learning deficits that could affect foraging. Bumblebees were tested for their ability to associate flower colour with reward value in a simulated foraging environment. Bumblebees completed 10 foraging trips in which they collected sucrose solution from artificial flowers that varied in sucrose concentration. The reward quality of each artificial flower was predicted by corolla colour. Unexposed bumblebees acquired a preference for feeding on the most rewarding flower colour on the second foraging trip, while bumblebees exposed at 2.6 and 10 ppb did not until their third and fifth trip, respectively. The delay in preference acquisition in exposed bumblebees may be due to reduced flower sampling and shorter foraging trips. These results show that bumblebees exposed to imidacloprid are slow to learn the reward value of flowers and this may explain previously observed foraging inefficiencies associated with pesticide exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bumblebee; Foraging; Imidacloprid; Learning; Memory; Neonicotinoid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29273854     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-017-1883-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  58 in total

1.  Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees.

Authors:  B A Woodcock; J M Bullock; R F Shore; M S Heard; M G Pereira; J Redhead; L Ridding; H Dean; D Sleep; P Henrys; J Peyton; S Hulmes; L Hulmes; M Sárospataki; C Saure; M Edwards; E Genersch; S Knäbe; R F Pywell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Field realistic doses of pesticide imidacloprid reduce bumblebee pollen foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Hannah Feltham; Kirsty Park; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Neonicotinoids and bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): effects on nectar consumption in individual workers.

Authors:  Helen M Thompson; Selwyn Wilkins; Sarah Harkin; Sarah Milner; Keith F A Walters
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in the bumblebee, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  Peter Skorupski; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Use of an innovative T-tube maze assay and the proboscis extension response assay to assess sublethal effects of GM products and pesticides on learning capacity of the honey bee Apis mellifera L.

Authors:  Peng Han; Chang-Ying Niu; Chao-Liang Lei; Jin-Jie Cui; Nicolas Desneux
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Movement of soil-applied imidacloprid and thiamethoxam into nectar and pollen of squash (Cucurbita pepo).

Authors:  Kimberly A Stoner; Brian D Eitzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pesticide reduces bumblebee colony initiation and increases probability of population extinction.

Authors:  Gemma L Baron; Vincent A A Jansen; Mark J F Brown; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  Does pathogen spillover from commercially reared bumble bees threaten wild pollinators?

Authors:  Michael C Otterstatter; James D Thomson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neonicotinoid pesticide exposure impairs crop pollination services provided by bumblebees.

Authors:  Dara A Stanley; Michael P D Garratt; Jennifer B Wickens; Victoria J Wickens; Simon G Potts; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Exposure to neonicotinoids influences the motor function of adult worker honeybees.

Authors:  Sally M Williamson; Sarah J Willis; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.823

View more
  4 in total

1.  Modality-specific impairment of learning by a neonicotinoid pesticide.

Authors:  Felicity Muth; Jacob S Francis; Anne S Leonard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Measuring foraging preferences in bumble bees: a comparison of popular laboratory methods and a test for sucrose preferences following neonicotinoid exposure.

Authors:  Sarah K Richman; Felicity Muth; Anne S Leonard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A neonicotinoid pesticide impairs foraging, but not learning, in free-flying bumblebees.

Authors:  F Muth; A S Leonard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Impacts of Neonicotinoids on the Bumble Bees Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens Examined through the Lens of an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.218

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.