Literature DB >> 30508078

Comparison of Pesticide Exposure in Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): Implications for Risk Assessments.

Angela E Gradish1, Jozef van der Steen2,3, Cynthia D Scott-Dupree1, Ana R Cabrera4, G Christopher Cutler5, Dave Goulson6, Olaf Klein7, David M Lehmann8, Johannes Lückmann9, Bridget O'Neill10, Nigel E Raine1, Bibek Sharma11, Helen Thompson12.   

Abstract

To date, regulatory pesticide risk assessments have relied on the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a surrogate test species for estimating the risk of pesticide exposure to all bee species. However, honey bees and non-Apis bees may differ in their susceptibility and exposure to pesticides. In 2017, a workshop ('Pesticide Exposure Assessment Paradigm for Non-Apis Bees') was held to assess if honey bee risk assessment frameworks are reflective of non-Apis bee pesticide exposure. In this article, we summarize the workshop discussions on bumble bees (Bombus spp.). We review the life history and foraging behavior of bumble bees and honey bees and discuss how these traits may influence routes and levels of exposure for both taxa. Overall, the major pesticide exposure routes for bumble bees and honey bees are similar; however, bumble bees face additional exposure routes (direct exposure of foraging queens and exposure of larvae and adults to soil residues). Furthermore, bumble bees may receive comparatively higher pesticide doses via contact or oral exposure. We conclude that honey bee pesticide risk assessments may not always be protective of bumble bees, especially queens, in terms of exposure. Data needed to reliably quantify pesticide exposure for bumble bees (e.g., food consumption rates, soil residue levels) are lacking. Addressing these knowledge gaps will be crucial before bumble bee exposure can be incorporated into the pesticide risk assessment process. Because bumble bees exhibit appreciable interspecific variation in colony and behavioral characteristics, data relevant to pesticide exposure should be generated for multiple species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30508078      PMCID: PMC8215506          DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvy168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  38 in total

1.  Extrapolation of acute toxicity across bee species.

Authors:  Helen Thompson
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.992

2.  Quantifying exposure of wild bumblebees to mixtures of agrochemicals in agricultural and urban landscapes.

Authors:  Cristina Botías; Arthur David; Elizabeth M Hill; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Effects of neonicotinoid insecticide exposure and monofloral diet on nest-founding bumblebee queens.

Authors:  Mar Leza; Kristal M Watrous; Jade Bratu; S Hollis Woodard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function.

Authors:  Laura A Burkle; John C Marlin; Tiffany M Knight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Comparative toxicity of pesticides and environmental contaminants in bees: Are honey bees a useful proxy for wild bee species?

Authors:  Matthew S Heard; Jan Baas; Jean-Lou Dorne; Elma Lahive; Alexander G Robinson; Agnes Rortais; David J Spurgeon; Claus Svendsen; Helen Hesketh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Ecology: Tasteless pesticides affect bees in the field.

Authors:  Nigel E Raine; Richard J Gill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  General and species-specific impacts of a neonicotinoid insecticide on the ovary development and feeding of wild bumblebee queens.

Authors:  Gemma L Baron; Nigel E Raine; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Pesticide reduces bumblebee colony initiation and increases probability of population extinction.

Authors:  Gemma L Baron; Vincent A A Jansen; Mark J F Brown; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 15.460

9.  Differential sensitivity of honey bees and bumble bees to a dietary insecticide (imidacloprid).

Authors:  James E Cresswell; Christopher J Page; Mehmet B Uygun; Marie Holmbergh; Yueru Li; Jonathan G Wheeler; Ian Laycock; Christopher J Pook; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Nick Smirnoff; Charles R Tyler
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Neonicotinoid pesticide exposure impairs crop pollination services provided by bumblebees.

Authors:  Dara A Stanley; Michael P D Garratt; Jennifer B Wickens; Victoria J Wickens; Simon G Potts; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Individual and combined impacts of sulfoxaflor and Nosema bombi on bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) larval growth.

Authors:  Harry Siviter; Arran J Folly; Mark J F Brown; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Microcolonies as a Tool for Biological Understanding and Pesticide Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Ellen G Klinger; Allison A Camp; James P Strange; Diana Cox-Foster; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.387

3.  Is Osmia bicornis an adequate regulatory surrogate? Comparing its acute contact sensitivity to Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Philipp Uhl; Osarobo Awanbor; Robert S Schulz; Carsten A Brühl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sulfoxaflor exposure reduces egg laying in bumblebees Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Harry Siviter; Jacob Horner; Mark J F Brown; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.528

5.  Toxicity of the insecticide sulfoxaflor alone and in combination with the fungicide fluxapyroxad in three bee species.

Authors:  C Azpiazu; J Bosch; L Bortolotti; P Medrzycki; D Teper; R Molowny-Horas; F Sgolastra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment?

Authors:  Helen Thompson; Sarah Vaughan; Anne-Katrin Mahlein; Erwin Ladewig; Christine Kenter
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 7.  Impacts of Neonicotinoids on the Bumble Bees Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens Examined through the Lens of an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.218

8.  Effects of the Neonicotinoid Acetamiprid in Pollen on Bombus impatiens Microcolony Development.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; Michael A Batres; Wanda C Williams; Robert W Koethe; Kimberly A Stoner; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.218

9.  Effects of the neonicotinoid acetamiprid in syrup on Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) microcolony development.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; Wanda C Williams; Brian D Eitzer; Robert W Koethe; David M Lehmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Lethal and Sublethal Effects of Pyriproxyfen on Apis and Non-Apis Bees.

Authors:  James Devillers; Hugo Devillers
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2020-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.