Literature DB >> 22613702

High resolution micro arthrography of hard and soft tissues in a murine model.

X I Gu1, P E Palacio-Mancheno, D J Leong, Y A Borisov, E Williams, N Maldonado, D Laudier, R J Majeska, M B Schaffler, H B Sun, L Cardoso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent developments on high resolution micro computed tomography (μCT) allow imaging of soft tissues in small animal joints. Nevertheless, μCT images cannot distinguish soft tissues from synovial fluid due to their similar mass density, limiting the 3D assessment of soft tissues volume and thickness. This study aimed to evaluate a lead chromate contrast agent for μCΤ arthrography of rat knee joints ex vivo.
DESIGN: Intact tibiofemoral rat joints were injected with the contrast agent at different concentrations and imaged using a μCT at 2.7 μm isotropic voxel size. Cartilage thickness was measured using an automated procedure, validated against histological measurements, and analyzed as a function of μCT image resolution. Changes in hard and soft tissues were also analyzed in tibiofemoral joints 4 weeks after surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM).
RESULTS: The contrast agent diffused well throughout the whole knee cavity without penetrating the tissues, therefore providing high contrast at the boundaries between soft tissues and synovial fluid space. Thickness analysis of cartilage demonstrated a high similarity between histology and μ-arthrography approaches (R(2) = 0.90). Four weeks after surgical DMM, the development of osteophytes (Oph) and cartilage ulcerations was recognizable with μCT, as well as a slight increase in trabecular bone porosity, and decrease in trabecular thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: A lead chromate-based contrast agent allowed discriminating the synovial fluid from soft tissues of intact knee joints, and thus made possible both qualitative and quantitative assessment of hard and soft tissues in both intact and DMM tibiofemoral joints using high resolution μCT.
Copyright © 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22613702      PMCID: PMC3411931          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  34 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Stephen K Boyd; Blaine A Christiansen; Robert E Guldberg; Karl J Jepsen; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Synovial joint degeneration and the syndrome of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J A Buckwalter; J Martin; H J Mankin
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Methods for evaluating the progression of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi; P L Lang; E J Alexander; D E Hurwitz
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

4.  Joint contact mechanics in the early stages of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Z Wu; W Herzog; M Epstein
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  The effect of cyclical compressive loading on gene expression in articular cartilage.

Authors:  Emma J Blain; Deborah J Mason; Victor C Duance
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage.

Authors:  Prashant N Bansal; Neel S Joshi; Vahid Entezari; Bethany C Malone; Rachel C Stewart; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  A new approach for assessing early osteoarthritis in the rat.

Authors:  M J Roberts; S B Adams; N A Patel; D L Stamper; M S Westmore; S D Martin; J G Fujimoto; M E Brezinski
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 8.  The physiologic basis of continuous passive motion for articular cartilage healing and regeneration.

Authors:  R B Salter
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.907

9.  Nondestructive assessment of sGAG content and distribution in normal and degraded rat articular cartilage via EPIC-microCT.

Authors:  L Xie; A S P Lin; R E Guldberg; M E Levenston
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Subchondral bone microstructural damage by increased remodelling aggravates experimental osteoarthritis preceded by osteoporosis.

Authors:  Miriam Bellido; Laura Lugo; Jorge A Roman-Blas; Santos Castañeda; Jose R Caeiro; Sonia Dapia; Emilio Calvo; Raquel Largo; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effect of tissue properties, shape and orientation of microcalcifications on vulnerable cap stability using different hyperelastic constitutive models.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Adreanne Kelly-Arnold; Natalia Maldonado; Damien Laudier; Sheldon Weinbaum
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Quantitative histological grading methods to assess subchondral bone and synovium changes subsequent to medial meniscus transection in the rat.

Authors:  Heidi E Kloefkorn; Kyle D Allen
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.417

3.  Effect of maternal care on hearing onset induced by developmental changes in the auditory periphery.

Authors:  Shana Adise; Aminat Saliu; Natalia Maldonado; Vivek Khatri; Luis Cardoso; Adrián Rodríguez-Contreras
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Murine articular cartilage morphology and compositional quantification with high resolution cationic contrast-enhanced μCT.

Authors:  Maleeha Mashiatulla; Meghan M Moran; Deva Chan; Jun Li; Jonathan D Freedman; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff; Anna Plaas; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Emerging targets in osteoarthritis therapy.

Authors:  Mary B Goldring; Francis Berenbaum
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.547

6.  Atherosclerotic plaque targeting mechanism of long-circulating nanoparticles established by multimodal imaging.

Authors:  Mark E Lobatto; Claudia Calcagno; Antoine Millon; Max L Senders; Francois Fay; Philip M Robson; Sarayu Ramachandran; Tina Binderup; Maarten P M Paridaans; Steven Sensarn; Stephan Rogalla; Ronald E Gordon; Luis Cardoso; Gert Storm; Josbert M Metselaar; Christopher H Contag; Erik S G Stroes; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  3D assessment of cortical bone porosity and tissue mineral density using high-resolution µCT: effects of resolution and threshold method.

Authors:  Paolo E Palacio-Mancheno; Adriana I Larriera; Stephen B Doty; Luis Cardoso; Susannah P Fritton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Rapid, automated imaging of mouse articular cartilage by microCT for early detection of osteoarthritis and finite element modelling of joint mechanics.

Authors:  P Das Neves Borges; A E Forte; T L Vincent; D Dini; M Marenzana
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Contrast-Enhanced Nanofocus X-Ray Computed Tomography Allows Virtual Three-Dimensional Histopathology and Morphometric Analysis of Osteoarthritis in Small Animal Models.

Authors:  Greet Kerckhofs; Julie Sainz; Marina Maréchal; Martine Wevers; Tom Van de Putte; Liesbet Geris; Jan Schrooten
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Three-Dimensional Quantitative Morphometric Analysis (QMA) for In Situ Joint and Tissue Assessment of Osteoarthritis in a Preclinical Rabbit Disease Model.

Authors:  Kathryn S Stok; Bryce A Besler; Thomas H Steiner; Ana V Villarreal Escudero; Martin A Zulliger; Markus Wilke; Kailash Atal; Aurelie Quintin; Bruno Koller; Ralph Müller; Dobrila Nesic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.