| Literature DB >> 22613677 |
Jun Li1, Li Zhang, Liang Zhou, Zheng-Ping Yu, Feng Qi, Bei Liu, Su-Xia Zi, Li Li, Yi Li, San-Bin Wang, Zheng-Jiang Cui, Xing-Hua Pan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunological arguments and historical examples have shown that treatment with cord blood for non-hematopoietic activities, such as growth factor production and stimulation of angiogenesis, may not require matching or immune suppression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22613677 PMCID: PMC3408346 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Summary of clinical history and the first densitometry data
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sex and age at study (years) | M, 53 | M, 41 | F, 36 | F, 39 | F, 41 | F, 44 | F, 42 | F, 37 |
| fragility fractures | vertebral bodies at age 51 | vertebral bodies at age 40 | vertebral bodies at age 33 | right hip at age 36 | no | no | since age 33, left humerus | no |
| age at first densitometry (years) | 51 | 40 | 33 | 36 | 38 | 41 | 41 | 34 |
| LS BMD at first densitometry (g/cm2) | 0.722 | 0.617 | 0.730 | 0.665 | 0.589 | 0.578 | 0.424 | 0.608 |
P: Patient, M: male, F: female, LS: lumbar spine; BMD: bone mineral density
Individual values of insulin-like growth factor 1 (ng/mL) along the therapy
| Baseline | 3 months | 1 year | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGF-1 (ng/ml) * | |||
| Patient 1 (male) | 286 | 372 | 390 |
| Patient 2 (male) | 277 | 388 | 286 |
| Patient 3 (male) | 183 | 306 | 232 |
| Patient 4 (male) | 365 | 446 | 359 |
| Patient 5 (male) | 406 | 489 | 428 |
| Patient 6 (male) | 89 | 371 | 280 |
| Patient 7 (male) | 177 | 304 | 212 |
| Patient 8 (male) | 330 | 399 | 316 |
* p = 0.002 comparing 3 months to baseline, p = 0.083 comparing 1 year to baseline
Variation and percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (g/cm)
| P 1 | P 2 | P 3 | P 4 | P 5 | P 6 | P 7 | P 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (M) | (M) | (F) | (F) | (F) | (F) | (F) | (F) |
| LS BMD (g/cm2) at baseline | 0.707 | 0.611 | 0.790 | 0.623 | 0.784 | 0.455 | 0.423 | 0.598 |
| LS BMD (g/cm2) at 3 months | 0.761 | 0.668 | 0.884 | 0.650 | 0.846 | 0.493 | 0.495 | 0.672 |
| LS BMD (g/cm2) at 1 year | 0.749 | 0.660 | 0.879 | 0.650 | 0.844 | 0.488 | 0.491 | 0.667 |
| % change LS BMD at 3 months | 7.6 | 9.3 | 11.9 | 4.3 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 17.0 | 12.4 |
| % change LS BMD at 1 year | 5.9 | 8.0 | 11.3 | 4.3 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 16.1 | 11.5 |
| Effect on LS BMD | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
P: Patient, (M): male, (F): female, LS: lumbar spine, BMD: bone mineral density, +: positive. The effect of cord blood mononuclear cells was considered as positive when the increase in bone mineral density was bigger than 1.5% at lumbar spine or when patients stopped loosing bone
Figure 1The lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density of patient 7 at baseline. A, The lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density of patient 7 at baseline. B, The lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density of patient 7 at 3 months. C, The lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density of patient 7 at 1 year.