| Literature DB >> 34318709 |
Jun Li1,2, Yinghong Jiang2, Hua Yu2, Lejiang Liu2, Qiang Wang3, Hongpin Ju2, Xuemei Zhang2, Wenqi Wang2, Xudong Yin4, Qiong Wu5, Jianzhong Xiao1, Jianrong Miao1, Xiao Ye1, Tianyu Li6, Hui Tian7, Wei Xue2.
Abstract
Radiation enteritis is the most common and serious complication of abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), as well as cell protection agents, inhibit apoptosis and promote the proliferation of injured tissues. 3 human umbilical cords MSCs (UCMSCs) were injected into the tail vein or peritoneal cavity of a rat model of radiation enteritis. The temporary protective effect was assessed by identification of donor cells, detection of cellular immune parameters and inflammatory cytokine levels, quantitation of jejunum mucosal preservation and examination of the rat remaining life. Only the rats in the intraperitoneal injection group exhibited a few positive donor cells 7 days after transplantation. CD4 +/CD8 + T cells, a cellular immune parameter, decreased in the abdominal exudate of intraperitoneal injection group, compared with the model-only control and tail vein groups (both P < .05). Both serum and abdominal exudate TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the intraperitoneally injected rats rapidly decreased and were significantly different from those in the model-only control and tail vein injection groups (all P < .05). Mucosal surface area and survival time increased in the intraperitoneal injection group compared with the vehicle and tail vein injection groups (all P = .000). Therefore, the administration of UCMSCs with intraperitoneal injection approach postponed death in a rat model of radiation enteritis, which was associated with reduced serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6). However, UCMSCs injected via the tail vein triggered an intense cellular immune response in the serum that adversely affects their survival. This treatment failed to suppress circulating serum and abdominal exudate levels of TNF-α and IL-6 and could not provide a therapeutic benefit for prolonging life against acute radiation enteritis.Entities:
Keywords: UCMSCs; acute radiation enteritis; intraperitoneal injection
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34318709 PMCID: PMC8323445 DOI: 10.1177/09636897211025230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Transplant ISSN: 0963-6897 Impact factor: 4.064
Figure 1.Donor cells with blue fluorescence in peripheral blood smears of the detection subgroup at day 7 after transplantation. (A) The model-only control group. (B) The tail vein injection group. (C) The intraperitoneal injection group. The intraperitoneal injection group rats exhibited positive donor cell engraftment, while the other groups of rats did not exhibit any positive cells (400×, n = 50).
Figure 2.The serum CD4+/CD8+ T cell number in the three detection subgroup at day 7 after transplantation (n = 50). The value of the cellular immune function parameter in the tail vein injection group was higher than that in the other two groups. P < .05 vs. the tail vein injection group.
Figure 3.Inflammatory cytokine TNF-α levels in serum. UCMSCs of the intraperitoneal injection group suppressed proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α production in vivo 7 days after treatment (n = 50, *P < .001 vs. the intraperitoneal injection group).
Figure 4.Serum inflammatory cytokine IL-6 levels on day 7 after treatment (n = 50). UCMSCs suppressed proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 production induced in vivo in the intraperitoneal injection group. Notably, UCMSCs in the tail vein injection group adversely affected the serum level of IL-6. P < .001 vs. the intraperitoneal injection group, P < .05 vs. the tail vein injection group.
Figure 5.Intraperitoneally injected UCMSCs alleviated the cellular immune response in abdominal exudate (n = 50). P < .05 vs. the intraperitoneal administration group.
Figure 6.Levels of the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in the abdominal exudate. UCMSCs of the intraperitoneal injection group suppressed proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α production 7 days after treatment (n = 50, *P < .01 vs. the intraperitoneal injection group).
Figure 7.Inflammatory cytokine IL-6 levels of the abdominal exudate on day 7 after treatment (n = 50). P < .05 vs. the intraperitoneal injection group.
Figure 8.Preservation of the mucosa at day 7 after transplantation (n = 50). Notable differences in mucosal surface area were observed in the intraperitoneal injection group. P < .001 vs. the intraperitoneal injection group.
Means and Medians for Survival Time.
| Group | Mean | Median | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Std. Error | 95% Confidence Interval | Estimate | Std. Error | 95% Confidence Interval | |||
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||||
| Model-only control | 9.520 | .194 | 9.139 | 9.901 | 9.000 | .261 | 8.488 | 9.512 |
| Tail vein injection | 9.380 | .242 | 8.905 | 9.855 | 9.000 | .286 | 8.439 | 9.561 |
| Intraperitoneal injection | 11.660 | .295 | 11.082 | 12.238 | 12.000 | .249 | 11.511 | 12.489 |
| Overall | 10.187 | .166 | 9.862 | 10.511 | 10.000 | .249 | 9.511 | 10.489 |
Figure 9.Cumulative survival curve of rats in the lifespan subgroup (n = 50).