Literature DB >> 20682053

Safety evaluation of allogeneic umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell therapy for degenerative conditions.

Wan-Zhang Yang1, Yun Zhang, Fang Wu, Wei-Ping Min, Boris Minev, Min Zhang, Xiao-Ling Luo, Famela Ramos, Thomas E Ichim, Neil H Riordan, Xiang Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current paradigm for cord blood transplantation is that HLA matching and immune suppression are strictly required to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD). Immunological arguments and historical examples have been made that the use of cord blood for non-hematopoietic activities such as growth factor production, stimulation of angiogenesis, and immune modulation may not require matching or immune suppression.
METHODS: 114 patients suffering from non-hematopoietic degenerative conditions were treated with non-matched, allogeneic cord blood. Doses of 1-3 x 10(7) cord blood mononuclear cells per treatment, with 4-5 treatments both intrathecal and intravenously were performed. Adverse events and hematological, immunological, and biochemical parameters were analyzed for safety evaluation.
RESULTS: No serious adverse effects were reported. Hematological, immunological, and biochemical parameters did not deviate from normal ranges as a result of therapy.
CONCLUSION: The current hematology-based paradigm of need for matching and immune suppression needs to be revisited when cord blood is used for non-hematopoietic regenerative purposes in immune competent recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20682053      PMCID: PMC2922090          DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Transl Med        ISSN: 1479-5876            Impact factor:   5.531


Background

Cord blood mononuclear cells are comprised of a heterogenous population of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and immature immunological cells [1,2]. The conventional medical use of cord blood is limited to hematopoietic reconstitution [3], with clinical trials ongoing in type I diabetes [4], and cerebral palsy [5]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated efficacy of cord blood in diverse conditions ranging from heat stroke [6,7], to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [8], to post infarct regeneration [9], to liver failure [10]. In hematopoietic stem cell transplants ablation of recipient marrow is required to eradicate the endogenous stem cell compartment, and HLA matching with post transplant immune suppression is used to prevent GVHD [3]. For non-hematopoietic applications such as cardiovascular or neurological indications, the therapeutic activities of the cord blood are believed to be mediated in many cases by growth factor secretion [11,12], therefore permanent graft survival is not essential. In these situations the use of non-matched, allogeneic cells may be acceptable. The major barrier to this approach is the theoretical fear of inducing GVHD. From practical experience there is some evidence that in immune competent recipients, non-matched allogeneic cord blood cells do not elicit GVHD. Specifically: a) Recipients of cord blood in the transfusion scenario, in some cases up to 37 units, have not reported GVHD; b) T cells comprise the GVHD-causing component of cord blood. Administration of allogeneic lymphocytes for prevention of recurrent spontaneous abortion has not led to GVHD, despite higher T cell doses than found in cord blood transplants; and c) Despite presence of fetal T cells in mothers, GVHD associated with pregnancy has not been reported [13]. Under the practice of medicine, several treatment facilities have been using cord blood stem cells without matching or immune suppression [14-17]. Despite identification of a "clinical signal", studies have been extremely limited in patient numbers. In the current report we analyzed safety parameters of 114 patients treated with non-matched, allogeneic cord blood mononuclear cells. Treatments included intravenous and intrathecal administration. No immunological reactions, GVHD, or serious adverse effects were observed. Hematological, biochemical, and immunological parameters remained within normal range.

Methods

Patient characteristics

Data reported was collected from patients treated during August 2005-July 2007 as part of medical practice at the Nanshan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College. All patients were free of: 1) prior history of severe allergic reactions; 2) history of, or active, malignancy; 3) active systemic or severe focal infections (including HIV and syphilis); 4) active cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic or gastrointestinal disease; 5) coagulopathy or any other contraindication for lumbar puncture; 6) gastrostomy, tracheostomy or noninvasive ventilatory support - as these could influence the prognosis and end-point measurements; 7) any severe psychiatric disorder and 8) any immunodeficiency disease or condition. Age range was 15 to 68 and the male:female ratio was 1.6:1 (70 males, 44 females). In terms of diagnosis, 4 patients had multiple system atrophy (MSA), 23 patients had ataxias, 42 patients were paraplegic, 19 patients had multiple sclerosis, 12 patients had Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and 14 patients had other diagnoses (Table 1). The local institutional review board of the Nanshan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, under the auspices of the National Ministry of Heath, approved application of the technique and consent forms were obtained from each patient before initiation of treatment.
Table 1

Patients treated by condition

ConditionNumber of patients
Paraplegia42
Ataxia23
Multiple Sclerosis19
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis12
Sequelae of Cerebrovascular Diseases6
Multiple System Atrophy4
Motor Neuron Disease2
Cerebral Palsy1
Nerve Injury (Brachial plexus)1
Traumatic Brain Injury Sequelae1
Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy Sequelae1
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy1
Optic Nerve Hypoplasia1
Patients treated by condition

Cell processing

Umbilical Cord Blood (100~ 150 mL) was collected from healthy unrelated donors (signed an informed consent) in accordance with the sterile procurement guidelines for cord blood in each hospital. After collection, each blood sample was tested for communicable diseases such as HBV, HCV, HIV, ALT, and Syphilis. Cord blood was diluted with saline in the ratio 2:1 and 30 mls of the diluted blood was then added to 15 mls of Ficoll in every 50 ml centrifuge tube and then centrifuged (750 g × 22 minutes). Mononuclear cells were collected and washed twice in saline. Contaminating erythrocytes were lyzed with lysis buffer comprising of injection grade water. Cell density was adjusted to 2 ~ 6 × 106/ml and seeded in DMEM/F12 culture medium with bFGF and EGF at a concentration of 20 ng/ml. Culture media was mixed with 2% v/v B-27 Stem Cell Culture Supplements. Cells were cultured at 37°C with saturated humidity and 5% CO2 by volume. At this stage, all relevant information about the initial culture is entered in the batch information record including test results for sterility, mycoplasma and endotoxin. Cell growth was regularly monitored and the inspection records updated accordingly. Cells were harvested for clinical application after one week of cultivation with cell quantity ≥1 × 107 and viability ≥95%. To ensure the quality of the UCB-derived mononuclear cells, a number of parameters are confirmed before use. These are as follows: 1) Raw material control: Tests (HBV, HCV, HIV, ALT and Syphilis) for communicable diseases for UCB units are carried out before any processing begins. Testing was performed by third party laboratory under local government-monitored conditions. 2) In-process control: Non-qualifying cells were eliminated in accordance with Beike's cell counting and morphology standards which include cell quantity ≥1 × 107 and the highly homogeneous cells possessing a round shape and non-adherence to the culture flask. 3) Culture control: Any contaminated cell suspensions or unhealthy cells were eliminated upon discovery. Non-contamination was determined as lack of sterility, mycoplasma, and lack of visible microorganisms by microscopy. Furthermore samples had to have an endotoxin level≤0.5 EU/ml and be negative for free DNA. 4) Finished product control: This incorporates a final cell count (≥1 × 107, containing 1.0-2.0% CD34+ cells as determined by flow cytometry), cell viability (≥95%) and sterility test.

Cell administration

Intrathecal injection by lumbar puncture was combined with intravenous infusion and repeated four or five times - depending on the patient's condition. Treatments were separated by one week intervals. Lumbar puncture was performed in the lateral decubitus position, prepped and draped in sterile fashion, and the needle placed in the lumbar cistern. Two mls of Cerebro-Spinal Fluid (CSF) was removed and replaced by 2 mls of cell suspension containing 1-3 × 107 cells. A 30 ml intravenous infusion of cell suspension was given through an intravenous catheter in 15-20 minutes.

Statistics

Adverse events were analyzed for all 114 cases, and are presented as percentage values. For analysis of laboratory parameters, the continuous variables were compared using Student t-test with alpha set at 0.05 by group. When the data set did not conform to the normal distribution, logarithmic transformation was used. Inter-quartile-range (IQR) computation and boxplots were used to detect outliers. The outliers were firmly believed to be data errors or data entry errors and were removed from the data analysis. The SPSS 13.0 statistical package was applied for statistical analysis.

Results

Administration of cord blood mononuclear cells via intrathecal and intravenous routes was well tolerated. No allergic or immunological reactions were noted at the time of injection or while under observation. Analysis of overall adverse events (Table 2) for a 4-5 week follow-up time period indicated headache as the most common (3.21%). In all cases headaches were transient in nature. No deviation outside of reference ranges was observed for hematological (Table 3), biochemical (Table 4), or immunological (Table 5) measurements. Average follow-up time for post-treatment analysis was 30 days. Some pre and post treatment differences reaching statistical significance were however observed.
Table 2

Analysis of adverse events (AE)

AETotal injections in person timeNumber of AE by type (person-time)Incidence of AE
Headache592193.21%

Fever59271.18%

Waist pain59250.84%

Shivering59230.51%

Vomiting59220.34%

Lower limb pain59220.34%

Total592386.42
Table 3

Hematology

ParameterNumber of patientsBefore treatmentAfter treatmentReference rangeP valueSignificance
Leukocytes (×109/L)1146.94 (1.57)7.85 (2.25)4.0-10.0<0.001In normal range but significantly elevated after treatment

Neutrophilic leukocytes % of total leukocytes11459.70 (10.39)65.03 (13.06)50.0-70.00.001In normal range but significantly elevated after treatment

Lymphocytes % of total leukocytes11430.23 (9.20)26.03 (10.32)20.0-40.0<0.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

RBC (×1012/L)1134.61 (0.51)4.47 (0.46)3.5-5.0<0.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Mean cell hemoglobin (g/L)113137.02 (14.54)132.88 (13.98)110.0-150.0<0.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Platelets (×109/L)113193.94 (47.64)206.21 (54.52)100.0-300.00.005In normal range but significantly elevated after treatment
Table 4

Serum chemistry

ParameterNumber of patientsBefore treatmentAfter treatmentReference rangeP valueSignificance
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)1131.13 (0.14)1.09 (0.15)0.23-1.350.002In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Total protein (g/L)11465.03 (5.27)63.20 (6.27)60.0-85.00.002In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, (GPT) (U/L)1141.37 (0.22)1.33 (0.20)0.7-1.650.037In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) (U/L)11423.60 (12.45)21.01 (8.56)5.0-45.00.005In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Serum urea nitrogen (BUN) (μmol/L)1144.63 (1.58)4.58 (1.88)2.0-7.10.750In normal range, no significant difference

Serum creatinine (SCR) (μmol/L)1141.81 (0.16)1.81 (0.16)1.64-2.120.898In normal range, no significant difference

Uric acid (UA) (μmol/L)114308.27 (80.88)309.28 (89.64)90.0-440.00.871In normal range, no significant difference
Table 5

Immunological parameters

ParameterNumber of patientsBefore treatmentAfter treatmentReference rangeP valueSignificance
T-cells (CD3)% of total T cells11379.91 (6.78)77.67 (8.18)61-850.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Helper T-cell (Th cell/CD4) % of total T cells11448.84 (9.03)45.44 (10.65)28-58<0.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Ts cell (CD8)% of total T cells11425.38 (7.18)26.89 (8.10)19-480.005In normal range but significantly increased after treatment

CD4/CD81140.30 (0.20)0.24 (0.23)-0.05-0.30<0.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

IgG (g/L)1140.96 (0.12)0.91 (0.14)0.86-1.23<0.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

IgA (g/L)1142.15 (0.79)2.01 (0.72)0.68-3.83<0.001In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

IgM (g/L)1141.13 (0.62)1.32 (0.72)0.63-2.77<0.001In normal range but significantly increased after treatment

Complement C3 (g/L)1141.19 (0.23)1.21 (0.25)0.85-1.930.103In normal range but no significant changes after treatment

Complement C4 (g/L)114-0.62 (0.17)-0.63 (-0.16)-0.92 - -0.440.283In normal range but no significant changes after treatment
Analysis of adverse events (AE) Hematology Serum chemistry Immunological parameters Slight but statistically significant alterations in mean hematological values were noted. Treatment was associated with increased total leukocyte 6.94 ± 1.57 vs 7.85 ± 2.25, neutrophil 59.70 ± 10.39 vs 65.03 ± 13.06, and platelet 193.94 ± 47.64 vs 206.21 ± 54.52 counts. Reduction in lymphocyte 30.23 ± 9.20 vs 26.03 ± 10.32, RBC4.61 ± 0.51 vs 4.47 ± 0.46, and MCH 137.02 ± 14.54 vs 132.88 ± 13.98 was observed (Table 3). Total bilirubin 1.13 ± 0.14 vs 1.09 ± 0.15, total protein 65.03 ± 5.27 vs 63.20 ± 6.27, GPT1.37 ± 0.22 vs 1.33 ± 0.20, GOT 23.60 ± 12.45 vs 21.01 ± 8.56, and creatinine 1.81 ± 0.16 vs 1.81 ± 0.16 where significantly decreased after treatment, whereas BUN and uric acid were not altered (Table 4). CD3 T cells 79.91 ± 6.78 vs 77.67 ± 8.18, CD4 T cells 48.84 ± 9.03 vs 45.44 ± 10.65, and the CD4/CD8 ratio 0.30 ± 0.20 vs 0.24 ± 0.23 were decreased, whereas an increase in CD8 cells was observed with treatment 25.38 ± 7.18 vs 26.89 ± 8.10. Of soluble immune parameters, C3 and C4 were not affected by treatment, whereas IgG 0.96 ± 0.12 vs 0.91 ± 0.14 and IgA 2.15 ± 0.79 vs 2.01 ± 0.72 levels were decreased. An increase in IgM levels 1.13 ± 0.62 vs 1.32 ± 0.72 was noted post treatment (Table 5).

Discussion

The possibility of using non-matched, allogeneic cord blood cells for regenerative medicine applications in absence of immune suppression would overcome several substantial hurdles existing today in stem cell therapy. Although cord blood derived cells are superior to bone marrow in terms of growth factor production ability, pluripotency, and immune modulating activity [18,19], their use has been limited to autologous sources for regenerative applications. The reason for this is has been the argument that the potential adverse effects of myeloablative therapy outweigh possible regenerative activities. The current study investigated the safety of allogeneic cord blood cells for use in regenerative applications in absence of immune suppression. No serious adverse effects were observed. The most common adverse reaction reported was headache (3.21%), some of which was believed to be caused by postural hypotensive headaches, which is a known complication of lumbar puncture procedures. These symptoms chronologically followed the treatment, and resolved spontaneously without aggressive intervention. These findings are consistent with a Boston Children's Hospital's study that recorded a similar adverse reaction profile to cryopreserved (CD34+) hematopoietic stem cells in the treatment of children [20]. These incidence rates are also similar to those of the published PBPC and Ficoll groups (grouped by isolation method). Of the full range of laboratory parameters in the analysis, only the changes of lymphocyte (decreased) and neutrophil (increased) count could be described as medically significant. A key contributing factor to these changes is possibly the fact that most patients received an intravenous injection of dexamethasone (5 mg, once) prior to each stem cell injection, to suppress possible adverse reactions. It has been reported that dexamethasone affects white blood cells, segmented neutrophils and lymphocytes [21], and that dexamethasone at therapeutic doses can have a suppressive effect on the lymphocyte proliferative response.

Conclusion

In summary, these data support the safety and freedom from immunologically-mediated adverse effects of allogeneic cord blood therapy in absence of immune suppression/myeloablation. This study presents for the first time a detailed safety analysis of using non-matched, allogeneic cord blood cells to treat non-hematopoietic degenerative conditions. The longest follow-up with this protocol was 4 years with no evidence of immune reactivity or GVHD. Evaluation of therapeutic benefit is currently in progress.

Competing interests

Xiang Hu is a shareholder of Beike Biotechnology. No other authors declare any competing interests.

Authors' contributions

WY conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and carried out the clinical treatment. YZ analyzed and interpreted data and drafted the manuscript. FW carried out the clinical treatment and collected data. WM analyzed data and helped to draft the manuscript. BM participated in the data analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. MZ participated in the design of the study and carried out the clinical treatment. XL carried out the clinical treatment and performed the statistical analysis. TI helped to draft the manuscript. FR, TEI and NR analyzed and interpreted data, performed the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. XH conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  20 in total

1.  Potential clinical applications using stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood.

Authors:  M J Ghen; R Roshan; R O Roshan; D J Blyweiss; N Corso; B Khalili; W T Zenga
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Transplantation of a novel cell line population of umbilical cord blood stem cells ameliorates neurological deficits associated with ischemic brain injury.

Authors:  Jing Xiao; Zhenhong Nan; Yasuhiko Motooka; Walter C Low
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Multipotent progenitor cells derived from human umbilical cord blood can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells in a liver injury rat model.

Authors:  Y J Moon; H H Yoon; M W Lee; I K Jang; D-H Lee; J-H Lee; S-K Lee; K-H Lee; Y J Kim; Y-W Eom
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Optimal time for human umbilical cord blood cell transplantation in rats with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yun-li Xing; Lu-hua Shen; Hong-wei Li; Yu-chen Zhang; Lin Zhao; Shu-mei Zhao; Qing Xu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Endothelial colony forming cells and mesenchymal stem cells are enriched at different gestational ages in human umbilical cord blood.

Authors:  M Jawad Javed; Laura E Mead; Daniel Prater; Waylan K Bessler; David Foster; Jamie Case; W Scott Goebel; Mervin C Yoder; Laura S Haneline; David A Ingram
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 6.  Placental mesenchymal and cord blood stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Thomas E Ichim; Fabio Solano; Roberto Brenes; Eduardo Glenn; Junbiao Chang; Kyle Chan; Neil H Riordan
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Human umbilical cord blood-derived CD34+ cells can be used as a prophylactic agent for experimental heatstroke.

Authors:  Wei-Shou Hwang; Sheng-Hsien Chen; Cheng-Hsien Lin; Hsiu-Kang Chang; Wei-Chun Chen; Mao-Tsun Lin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 8.  Cord blood in regenerative medicine: do we need immune suppression?

Authors:  Neil H Riordan; Kyle Chan; Annette M Marleau; Thomas E Ichim
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Autologous umbilical cord blood transfusion in very young children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Michael J Haller; Clive H Wasserfall; Kieran M McGrail; Miriam Cintron; Todd M Brusko; John R Wingard; Susan S Kelly; Jonathan J Shuster; Mark A Atkinson; Desmond A Schatz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.152

10.  Peripheral injection of human umbilical cord blood stimulates neurogenesis in the aged rat brain.

Authors:  Adam D Bachstetter; Mibel M Pabon; Michael J Cole; Charles E Hudson; Paul R Sanberg; Alison E Willing; Paula C Bickford; Carmelina Gemma
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Neurological disorders and the potential role for stem cells as a therapy.

Authors:  Paul R Sanberg; David J Eve; L Eduardo Cruz; Cesar V Borlongan
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Human umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cell transplantation: case series of 30 subjects with hereditary ataxia.

Authors:  Wan-Zhang Yang; Yun Zhang; Fang Wu; Min Zhang; S C Cho; Chun-Zhen Li; Shao-Hui Li; Guo-Jian Shu; You-Xiang Sheng; Ning Zhao; Ying Tang; Shu Jiang; Shan Jiang; Matthew Gandjian; Thomas E Ichim; Xiang Hu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 3.  From cord to caudate: characterizing umbilical cord blood stem cells and their paracrine interactions with the injured brain.

Authors:  Priya F Maillacheruvu; Lauren M Engel; Isaiah T Crum; Devendra K Agrawal; Eric S Peeples
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 4.  The potential for cell-based therapy in perinatal brain injuries.

Authors:  Andre W Phillips; Michael V Johnston; Ali Fatemi
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Beneficial effects of non-matched allogeneic cord blood mononuclear cells upon patients with idiopathic osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jun Li; Li Zhang; Liang Zhou; Zheng-Ping Yu; Feng Qi; Bei Liu; Su-Xia Zi; Li Li; Yi Li; San-Bin Wang; Zheng-Jiang Cui; Xing-Hua Pan
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Human cord blood-derived mononuclear cell transplantation for viral encephalitis-associated cognitive impairment: a case report.

Authors:  Wan-Zhang Yang; Guo-Jian Shu; Yun Zhang; Fang Wu; Bi-Yu Ye; Xiang Hu
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-08

7.  Feasibility of combination allogeneic stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury: a case report.

Authors:  Thomas E Ichim; Fabio Solano; Fabian Lara; Eugenia Paris; Federico Ugalde; Jorge Paz Rodriguez; Boris Minev; Vladimir Bogin; Famela Ramos; Erik J Woods; Michael P Murphy; Amit N Patel; Robert J Harman; Neil H Riordan
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-11-11

Review 8.  Clinical trials for stem cell therapies.

Authors:  Alan Trounson; Rahul G Thakar; Geoff Lomax; Don Gibbons
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Therapeutic effects of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells after intrathecal administration by lumbar puncture in a rat model of cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Jung Yeon Lim; Chang Hyun Jeong; Jin Ae Jun; Seong Muk Kim; Chung Heon Ryu; Yun Hou; Wonil Oh; Jong Wook Chang; Sin-Soo Jeun
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Safety of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cells Therapy in Patients with Severe Cerebral Palsy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Mei Feng; Aili Lu; Hongxia Gao; Caiwen Qian; Jun Zhang; Tongxiang Lin; Yuanqi Zhao
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.