Literature DB >> 22612331

Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations. 4. van der Waals parametrization.

Junmei Wang1, Piotr Cieplak, Jie Li, Qin Cai, Meng-Juei Hsieh, Ray Luo, Yong Duan.   

Abstract

In the previous publications of this series, we presented a set of Thole induced dipole interaction models using four types of screening functions. In this work, we document our effort to refine the van der Waals parameters for the Thole polarizable models. Following the philosophy of AMBER force field development, the van der Waals (vdW) parameters were tuned for the Thole model with linear screening function to reproduce both the ab initio interaction energies and the experimental densities of pure liquids. An in-house genetic algorithm was applied to maximize the fitness of "chromosomes" which is a function of the root-mean-square errors (RMSE) of interaction energy and liquid density. To efficiently explore the vdW parameter space, a novel approach was developed to estimate the liquid densities for a given vdW parameter set using the mean residue-residue interaction energies through interpolation/extrapolation. This approach allowed the costly molecular dynamics simulations be performed at the end of each optimization cycle only and eliminated the simulations during the cycle. Test results show notable improvements over the original AMBER FF99 vdW parameter set, as indicated by the reduction in errors of the calculated pure liquid densities (d), heats of vaporization (H(vap)), and hydration energies. The average percent error (APE) of the densities of 59 pure liquids was reduced from 5.33 to 2.97%; the RMSE of H(vap) was reduced from 1.98 to 1.38 kcal/mol; the RMSE of solvation free energies of 15 compounds was reduced from 1.56 to 1.38 kcal/mol. For the interaction energies of 1639 dimers, the overall performance of the optimized vdW set is slightly better than the original FF99 vdW set (RMSE of 1.56 versus 1.63 kcal/mol). The optimized vdW parameter set was also evaluated for the exponential screening function used in the Amoeba force field to assess its applicability for different types of screening functions. Encouragingly, comparable performance was observed when the optimized vdW set was combined with the Thole Amoeba-like polarizable model, particularly for the interaction energy and liquid density calculations. Thus, the optimized vdW set is applicable to both types of Thole models with either linear or Amoeba-like screening functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612331      PMCID: PMC3391542          DOI: 10.1021/jp3019759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  30 in total

1.  Automated docking of peptides and proteins by using a genetic algorithm combined with a tabu search.

Authors:  T Hou; J Wang; L Chen; X Xu
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Synchronization of trajectories in canonical molecular-dynamics simulations: observation, explanation, and exploitation.

Authors:  Blas P Uberuaga; Marian Anghel; Arthur F Voter
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Reference MP2/CBS and CCSD(T) quantum-chemical calculations on stacked adenine dimers. Comparison with DFT-D, MP2.5, SCS(MI)-MP2, M06-2X, CBS(SCS-D) and force field descriptions.

Authors:  Claudio A Morgado; Petr Jurecka; Daniel Svozil; Pavel Hobza; Jirí Sponer
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

7.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Polarization effects in molecular mechanical force fields.

Authors:  Piotr Cieplak; François-Yves Dupradeau; Yong Duan; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 2.333

9.  Application of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Molecular Property Prediction I: Density and Heat of Vaporization.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Hou Tingjun
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Small molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent: An extensive test of fixed-charge atomistic simulations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Christopher I Bayly; Matthew D Cooper; Michael R Shirts; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Classical electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  G Andrés Cisneros; Mikko Karttunen; Pengyu Ren; Celeste Sagui
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Force field development phase II: Relaxation of physics-based criteria… or inclusion of more rigorous physics into the representation of molecular energetics.

Authors:  A T Hagler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Recent Force Field Strategies for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Junxi Mu; Hao Liu; Jian Zhang; Ray Luo; Hai-Feng Chen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Implementing electrostatic polarization cannot fill the gap between experimental and theoretical measurements for the ultrafast fluorescence decay of myoglobin.

Authors:  Bingbing Lin; Ya Gao; Yongxiu Li; John Z H Zhang; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Determining polarizable force fields with electrostatic potentials from quantum mechanical linear response theory.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Efficient formulation of polarizable Gaussian multipole electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Haixin Wei; Ruxi Qi; Junmei Wang; Piotr Cieplak; Yong Duan; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Force Fields for Small Molecules.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

Review 9.  An Empirical Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator Model: Development History and Recent Applications.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Jing Huang; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Calculating protein-ligand binding affinities with MMPBSA: Method and error analysis.

Authors:  Changhao Wang; Peter H Nguyen; Kevin Pham; Danielle Huynh; Thanh-Binh Nancy Le; Hongli Wang; Pengyu Ren; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.