Literature DB >> 22611466

Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type.

Kerstin Martha Mensien Burseg, Sara Marina Camacho, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Bult.   

Abstract

Effects of subjects' taste sensitivity (expressed as taste detection threshold), tastant quality and taste transduction mechanism on pulsation-induced taste enhancement were tested. Taste intensities of pulsatile MSG and NaCl stimuli at pulsation periods below, at and above individual taste fusion periods (TFP in seconds) were compared to taste intensities of a continuous reference of the same net tastant concentration and quality. In line with results previously reported for sucrose, pulsation-induced taste enhancement peaked around TFP for both MSG and NaCl and did not require perception of tastant pulsation. TFP and pulsation effects were independent of the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor for MSG versus ion-channel for NaCl). The absence of a relation between TFP and taste sensitivity suggests that temporal gustatory resolution and taste sensitivity are not necessarily influenced by the same factors. The results support earlier findings that early stages of taste transduction are involved in pulsation-induced taste enhancement. Pulsation-induced taste enhancement is determined by the pulsation rate (i.e. TFP) which is longer for MSG than NaCl. This is probably due to the tastant-specific interaction with the receptor rather than the taste transduction mechanism (G-protein-coupled receptor versus ion-channel) involved.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22611466      PMCID: PMC3343238          DOI: 10.1007/s12078-012-9126-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosens Percept        ISSN: 1936-5802            Impact factor:   1.833


  25 in total

1.  Sweet taste enhancement through pulsatile stimulation depends on pulsation period not on conscious pulse perception.

Authors:  Kerstin Martha Mensien Burseg; Celine Brattinga; Petrus Maria Theresia de Kok; Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Bult
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-03-20

2.  Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert.

Authors:  Johannes H F Bult; Rene A de Wijk; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Visual masking approaches to visual awareness.

Authors:  Stephen L Macknik
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Flicker brightness enhancement and visual nonlinearity.

Authors:  S Wu; S A Burns; A Reeves; A E Elsner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Enhancement of taste intensity through pulsatile stimulation.

Authors:  H L Meiselman; B P Halpern
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1973-11

6.  Gustatory reaction time in human adults.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; Y Kawamura
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1981-04

7.  Binding of glutamate to the umami receptor.

Authors:  J J López Cascales; S D Oliveira Costa; Bert L de Groot; D Eric Walters
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Sweet taste intensity is enhanced by temporal fluctuation of aroma and taste, and depends on phase shift.

Authors:  Kerstin Martha Mensien Burseg; Sara Camacho; Janine Knoop; Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Bult
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-08-25

9.  A new specific ageusia: some humans cannot taste L-glutamate.

Authors:  O Lugaz; A-M Pillias; A Faurion
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Gustatory reaction time to various sweeteners in human adults.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; T Kato; R Matsuo; Y Kawamura; M Yoshida
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1985-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Food Oral Processing-An Industry Perspective.

Authors:  Marine Devezeaux De Lavergne; Ashley K Young; Jan Engmann; Christoph Hartmann
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-02-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.