Literature DB >> 20800075

Sweet taste intensity is enhanced by temporal fluctuation of aroma and taste, and depends on phase shift.

Kerstin Martha Mensien Burseg1, Sara Camacho, Janine Knoop, Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Bult.   

Abstract

Pulsatile stimulation enhances taste intensity compared to continuous stimulation with stimuli of the same net tastant concentration. In the present work, we studied the effects of pulsatile delivery of aroma and taste on their combined contribution to taste intensity. Effects on taste perception were evaluated for aroma and taste pulsation and the aroma pulse-taste pulse phase shift. High-concentration sucrose pulses were alternated with water rinses every 2.5s. Four different aroma (isoamyl acetate) versions were presented: (1) no aroma, (2) continuous aroma (3) aroma pulses in-phase and (4) aroma pulses out-of-phase with taste pulses. Aroma-taste combinations were evaluated for sweetness intensity by a 15-member trained panel using time-intensity analysis. Sweetness intensity was enhanced by pulsatile stimulation of sucrose or isoamyl acetate. In addition, taste enhancement by aroma and tastant pulses was additive if both were presented out-of-phase which resulted a sweetness intensity enhancement by more than 35% compared to a continuous sucrose reference of the same net sucrose concentration. Aroma-induced sweetness enhancement can be explained by cross-modal aroma-taste integration. Amplification of aroma-taste integration by pulsatile stimulation may be attributed to a potentiated afferent input of aroma and taste information prior to aroma-taste integration. Alternative mechanisms include the importance of swallowing on aroma-taste integration.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20800075     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  6 in total

1.  A salty-congruent odor enhances saltiness: functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Han-Seok Seo; Emilia Iannilli; Cornelia Hummel; Yoshiro Okazaki; Dorothee Buschhüter; Johannes Gerber; Gerhard E Krammer; Bernhard van Lengerich; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Processing of Intraoral Olfactory and Gustatory Signals in the Gustatory Cortex of Awake Rats.

Authors:  Chad L Samuelsen; Alfredo Fontanini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Taste Enhancement by Pulsatile Stimulation Is Receptor Based But Independent of Receptor Type.

Authors:  Kerstin Martha Mensien Burseg; Sara Marina Camacho; Johannes Hendrikus Franciscus Bult
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Impact of pulsation rate and viscosity on taste perception - Application of a porous medium model for human tongue surface.

Authors:  Zhenxing Wu; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 6.698

5.  Individual Differences in Sweetness Ratings and Cross-Modal Aroma-Taste Interactions.

Authors:  Anne Sjoerup Bertelsen; Line Ahm Mielby; Niki Alexi; Derek Victor Byrne; Ulla Kidmose
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-02-01

6.  Ternary Cross-Modal Interactions between Sweetness, Aroma, and Viscosity in Different Beverage Matrices.

Authors:  Anne Sjoerup Bertelsen; Line Ahm Mielby; Derek Victor Byrne; Ulla Kidmose
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-03-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.