Literature DB >> 22610909

Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns contributing to missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers: a process analysis of closed malpractice claims.

Eric G Poon1, Allen Kachalia, Ann Louise Puopolo, Tejal K Gandhi, David M Studdert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To erform a process analysis of missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers to identify: (1) the cognitive and logistical factors that lead to these diagnostic errors, and (2) prevention strategies.
METHODS: Using 56 cases (43 breast, 13 colon) of missed and delayed diagnosis, we performed structured analyses to identify specific points in the diagnostic process in which errors occurred. Each error was classified as either a cognitive error or logistical breakdown. Finally, two physician-investigators identified strategies to prevent the errors in each case.
RESULTS: Virtually all cases involved one or more cognitive errors (53/56, 95 %) and approximately half (31/56, 55 %) involved logistical breakdowns. The clinical activity most prone to cognitive error was the selection of the diagnostic strategy, both during the office visit (25/56, 45 %) and during interpretation of test results (22/50, 44 %). Arrangement of follow-up visits with a primary care physician (8/29, 28 %) or specialist physician (7/29, 26 %) were especially prone to logistical breakdowns. Adherence to current clinical guidelines could have prevented at least one error in 66 % of cases and assistance from a patient advocate could have prevented at least one error in 48 % of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns are common among missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers. Prevention strategies should focus on ensuring improving the effectiveness and use of clinical guidelines in the selection of diagnostic strategy, both during office visits and when interpreting test results. Tools to facilitate communication and to ensure that follow-up visits occur should also be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610909      PMCID: PMC3475819          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2107-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  22 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States.

Authors:  R L Phillips; L A Bartholomew; S M Dovey; G E Fryer; T J Miyoshi; L A Green
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

3.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions.

Authors:  Robert H Miller; Ida Sim
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Why diagnostic errors don't get any respect--and what can be done about them.

Authors:  Robert M Wachter
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another.

Authors:  Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: evidence from the National Practitioner Data Bank.

Authors:  Amitabh Chandra; Shantanu Nundy; Seth A Seabury
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Diagnostic error in internal medicine.

Authors:  Mark L Graber; Nancy Franklin; Ruthanna Gordon
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-07-11

8.  Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  H R Burstin; W G Johnson; S R Lipsitz; T A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems.

Authors:  H J Murff; T K Gandhi; A K Karson; E A Mort; E G Poon; S J Wang; D G Fairchild; D W Bates
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Supporting patient care beyond the clinical encounter: three informatics innovations from partners health care.

Authors:  Eric G Poon; Jonathan Wald; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton; Gilad J Kuperman; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003
View more
  11 in total

1.  Diagnostic Evaluation of Patients Presenting to Primary Care with Rectal Bleeding.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Lydia E Pace; Kevin H Nguyen; Charis N Crofton; Katharine A Normandin; Sara J Singer; Meredith B Rosenthal; Alyna T Chien
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Bending the arc of the health care universe through systems improvement.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Patient Preferences for Test Result Notification.

Authors:  Samuel K Shultz; Robert Wu; John J Matelski; Xin Lu; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Responsibility for follow-up during the diagnostic process in primary care: a secondary analysis of International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership data.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Clare R Goyder; Clare R Bankhead; Berit S Toftegaard; Peter W Rose; Hans Thulesius; Peter Vedsted; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Eric J Thomas; Ashley N D Meyer; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparing Diagnostic Evaluations for Rectal Bleeding and Breast Lumps in Primary Care: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Sanja Percac-Lima; Kevin H Nguyen; Charis N Crofton; Katharine A Normandin; Sara J Singer; Meredith B Rosenthal; Alyna T Chien
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports?

Authors:  Caroline E Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Tessa S Cook; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal breast cancer screening mammograms in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeanette C Reece; Eleanor F G Neal; Peter Nguyen; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Nutrition Information in Oncology - Extending the Electronic Patient-Record Data Set.

Authors:  Priscila A Maranhão; Ana Margarida Pereira; Conceição Calhau; Paula Ravasco; Federico Bozzetti; Alessandro Laviano; Liz Isenring; Elisa V Bandera; Maureen B Huhmann; Pedro Vieira-Marques; Ricardo J Cruz-Correia
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Specific Disease Knowledge as Predictor of Susceptibility to Availability Bias in Diagnostic Reasoning: a Randomized Controlled Experiment.

Authors:  Sílvia Mamede; Marco Goeijenbier; Stephanie C E Schuit; Marco Antonio de Carvalho Filho; Justine Staal; Laura Zwaan; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.