Literature DB >> 8411499

Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status.

H R Burstin1, W G Johnson, S R Lipsitz, T A Brennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether socioeconomic status is associated with risk of malpractice claims, particularly among those who have suffered medical injury.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Fifty-one hospitals in New York State.
METHODS: The presence and severity of medical injury, defined as disability at the time of discharge or prolongation of the hospitalization caused by medical treatment as opposed to the disease process, were assessed through review of approximately 31,000 hospital records in New York in 1984. These sampled records were then linked to formal malpractice claims. To estimate the risk of malpractice claims by age, gender, race, insurance status, and income, we conducted a case-control study of claimant cases matched with nonclaimant controls. The cases were all those patients who filed malpractice claims referring to alleged malpractice during a sampled hospitalization. Physician reviewers had previously judged the level of disability that resulted from the medical injury. Claimants (n = 51) were each matched with five nonclaimant controls on the basis of injury. Noninjured cases were matched with noninjured controls and injured cases were matched with injured controls.
RESULTS: We found that poor patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.8) and uninsured patients (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.005 to 0.9) were significantly less likely to file malpractice claims, after controlling for the severity of medical injury. Among patients who suffered medical injury, the elderly (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.9) were also less likely to file claims. Gender and race were not independently associated with risk of malpractice claims.
CONCLUSIONS: Poor and uninsured patients are significantly less likely to sue for malpractice, even after controlling for the presence of medical injury. Fear of malpractice risk should not be a significant factor in the decision to serve the poor. Tort reforms that would protect physicians who serve the medically indigent from malpractice suits may not be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8411499     DOI: 10.1001/jama.270.14.1697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  22 in total

1.  Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.

Authors:  Marie Bismark; Edward Dauer; Ron Paterson; David Studdert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Professional liability in orthopaedics and traumatology in Italy.

Authors:  Umberto Tarantino; Alessio Giai Via; Ernesto Macrì; Alessandro Eramo; Valeria Marino; Luigi Tonino Marsella
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice?

Authors:  Shivkrit Rai; Vishwas H Devaiah
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-04-04

4.  Specialists' and primary care physicians' participation in medicaid managed care.

Authors:  L Backus; D Osmond; K Grumbach; K Vranizan; L Phuong; A B Bindman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Do poor people sue doctors more frequently? Confronting unconscious bias and the role of cultural competency.

Authors:  Frank M McClellan; Augustus A White; Ramon L Jimenez; Sherin Fahmy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Currents in contemporary ethics. Malpractice immunity for volunteer physicians in Public Health Emergencies: adding insult to injury.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Reducing risk with clinical decision support: a study of closed malpractice claims.

Authors:  G Zuccotti; F L Maloney; J Feblowitz; L Samal; L Sato; A Wright
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 8.  Liability implications of physician-directed care coordination.

Authors:  Mark A Hall; Ralph A Peeples; Richard W Lord
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Process of care failures in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Mark G Saadeh; Brett Simchowitz; Tejal K Gandhi; Larissa Nekhlyudov; David M Studdert; Ann Louise Puopolo; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?

Authors:  W K Mariner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.