Literature DB >> 22608722

Measuring processivity.

Svein J Horn1, Morten Sørlie, Kjell M Vårum, Priit Väljamäe, Vincent G H Eijsink.   

Abstract

Natural cellulolytic enzyme systems as well as leading commercial cellulase cocktails are dominated by enzymes that degrade cellulose chains in a processive manner. Despite the abundance of processivity among natural cellulases, the molecular basis as well as the biotechnological implications of this mechanism are only partly understood. One of the major limitations lies in the fact that it is not straightforward to measure and quantify processivity in what essentially are biphasic experimental systems. Here, we describe and discuss both well-established methods and newer methods for measuring cellulase processivity. In addition, we discuss recent insights from studies on chitinases that may help direct further studies on processivity in cellulases.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22608722     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-415931-0.00005-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  31 in total

1.  Slow Off-rates and Strong Product Binding Are Required for Processivity and Efficient Degradation of Recalcitrant Chitin by Family 18 Chitinases.

Authors:  Mihhail Kurašin; Silja Kuusk; Piret Kuusk; Morten Sørlie; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Substrate selectivity in starch polysaccharide monooxygenases.

Authors:  Van V Vu; John A Hangasky; Tyler C Detomasi; Skylar J W Henry; Son Tung Ngo; Elise A Span; Michael A Marletta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Temperature Effects on Kinetic Parameters and Substrate Affinity of Cel7A Cellobiohydrolases.

Authors:  Trine Holst Sørensen; Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger; Michael Skovbo Windahl; Silke Flindt Badino; Kim Borch; Peter Westh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  A Novel Glycoside Hydrolase Family 113 Endo-β-1,4-Mannanase from Alicyclobacillus sp. Strain A4 and Insight into the Substrate Recognition and Catalytic Mechanism of This Family.

Authors:  Wei Xia; Haiqiang Lu; Mengjuan Xia; Ying Cui; Yingguo Bai; Lichun Qian; Pengjun Shi; Huiying Luo; Bin Yao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Endo-exo synergism in cellulose hydrolysis revisited.

Authors:  Jürgen Jalak; Mihhail Kurašin; Hele Teugjas; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Structure and mechanism of Staphylococcus aureus TarM, the wall teichoic acid α-glycosyltransferase.

Authors:  Solmaz Sobhanifar; Liam James Worrall; Robert J Gruninger; Gregory A Wasney; Markus Blaukopf; Lars Baumann; Emilie Lameignere; Matthew Solomonson; Eric D Brown; Stephen G Withers; Natalie C J Strynadka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Prior-Apprised Unsupervised Learning of Subpixel Curvilinear Features in Low Signal/Noise Images.

Authors:  Shuhui Yin; Ming Tien; Haw Yang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Kinetics of cellobiohydrolase (Cel7A) variants with lowered substrate affinity.

Authors:  Jeppe Kari; Johan Olsen; Kim Borch; Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger; Kenneth Jensen; Peter Westh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The predominant molecular state of bound enzyme determines the strength and type of product inhibition in the hydrolysis of recalcitrant polysaccharides by processive enzymes.

Authors:  Silja Kuusk; Morten Sørlie; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A trimodular bacterial enzyme combining hydrolytic activity with oxidative glycosidic bond cleavage efficiently degrades chitin.

Authors:  Sophanit Mekasha; Tina Rise Tuveng; Fatemeh Askarian; Swati Choudhary; Claudia Schmidt-Dannert; Axel Niebisch; Jan Modregger; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.