Literature DB >> 25767120

The predominant molecular state of bound enzyme determines the strength and type of product inhibition in the hydrolysis of recalcitrant polysaccharides by processive enzymes.

Silja Kuusk1, Morten Sørlie2, Priit Väljamäe3.   

Abstract

Processive enzymes are major components of the efficient enzyme systems that are responsible for the degradation of the recalcitrant polysaccharides cellulose and chitin. Despite intensive research, there is no consensus on which step is rate-limiting for these enzymes. Here, we performed a comparative study of two well characterized enzymes, the cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Hypocrea jecorina and the chitinase ChiA from Serratia marcescens. Both enzymes were inhibited by their disaccharide product, namely chitobiose for ChiA and cellobiose for Cel7A. The products behaved as noncompetitive inhibitors according to studies using the (14)C-labeled crystalline polymeric substrates (14)C chitin nanowhiskers and (14)C-labeled bacterial microcrystalline cellulose for ChiA and Cel7A, respectively. The resulting observed Ki (obs) values were 0.45 ± 0.08 mm for ChiA and 0.17 ± 0.02 mm for Cel7A. However, in contrast to ChiA, the Ki (obs) of Cel7A was an order of magnitude higher than the true Ki value governed by the thermodynamic stability of the enzyme-inhibitor complex. Theoretical analysis of product inhibition suggested that the inhibition strength and pattern can be accounted for by assuming different rate-limiting steps for ChiA and Cel7A. Measuring the population of enzymes whose active site was occupied by a polymer chain revealed that Cel7A was bound predominantly via its active site. Conversely, the active-site-mediated binding of ChiA was slow, and most ChiA exhibited a free active site, even when the substrate concentration was saturating for the activity. Collectively, our data suggest that complexation with the polymer chain is rate-limiting for ChiA, whereas Cel7A is limited by dissociation.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellulase; Cellulose; Chitin; Chitinase; Enzyme Kinetics; Product Inhibition; Rate-limiting Step

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767120      PMCID: PMC4416869          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.635631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  68 in total

1.  Product binding varies dramatically between processive and nonprocessive cellulase enzymes.

Authors:  Lintao Bu; Mark R Nimlos; Michael R Shirts; Jerry Ståhlberg; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis.

Authors:  Jürgen Jalak; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Serratia marcescens chitinases with tunnel-shaped substrate-binding grooves show endo activity and different degrees of processivity during enzymatic hydrolysis of chitosan.

Authors:  Pawel Sikorski; Audun Sørbotten; Svein J Horn; Vincent G H Eijsink; Kjell M Vårum
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Two-way traffic of glycoside hydrolase family 18 processive chitinases on crystalline chitin.

Authors:  Kiyohiko Igarashi; Takayuki Uchihashi; Taku Uchiyama; Hayuki Sugimoto; Masahisa Wada; Kazushi Suzuki; Shohei Sakuda; Toshio Ando; Takeshi Watanabe; Masahiro Samejima
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter.

Authors:  T Wiseman; S Williston; J F Brandts; L N Lin
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Carbohydrate-protein interactions that drive processive polysaccharide translocation in enzymes revealed from a computational study of cellobiohydrolase processivity.

Authors:  Brandon C Knott; Michael F Crowley; Michael E Himmel; Jerry Ståhlberg; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Role of the interdomain linker peptide of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I in its interaction with crystalline cellulose.

Authors:  M Srisodsuk; T Reinikainen; M Penttilä; T T Teeri
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Fungal cellulase systems. Comparison of the specificities of the cellobiohydrolases isolated from Penicillium pinophilum and Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  M Claeyssens; H Van Tilbeurgh; P Tomme; T M Wood; S I McRae
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents.

Authors:  M Holtzapple; M Cognata; Y Shu; C Hendrickson
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Product inhibition of cellulases studied with 14C-labeled cellulose substrates.

Authors:  Hele Teugjas; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  15 in total

1.  Kinetic insights into the role of the reductant in H2O2-driven degradation of chitin by a bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase.

Authors:  Silja Kuusk; Riin Kont; Piret Kuusk; Agnes Heering; Morten Sørlie; Bastien Bissaro; Vincent G H Eijsink; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Slow Off-rates and Strong Product Binding Are Required for Processivity and Efficient Degradation of Recalcitrant Chitin by Family 18 Chitinases.

Authors:  Mihhail Kurašin; Silja Kuusk; Piret Kuusk; Morten Sørlie; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Kinetics of H2O2-driven degradation of chitin by a bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase.

Authors:  Silja Kuusk; Bastien Bissaro; Piret Kuusk; Zarah Forsberg; Vincent G H Eijsink; Morten Sørlie; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Substrate binding in the processive cellulase Cel7A: Transition state of complexation and roles of conserved tryptophan residues.

Authors:  Nanna Røjel; Jeppe Kari; Trine Holst Sørensen; Silke F Badino; J Preben Morth; Kay Schaller; Ana Mafalda Cavaleiro; Kim Borch; Peter Westh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Inter-domain Synergism Is Required for Efficient Feeding of Cellulose Chain into Active Site of Cellobiohydrolase Cel7A.

Authors:  Riin Kont; Jeppe Kari; Kim Borch; Peter Westh; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Structure, Catalysis, and Inhibition of OfChi-h, the Lepidoptera-exclusive Insect Chitinase.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Lei Chen; Yong Zhou; Xi Jiang; Yanwei Duan; Qing Yang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A mutant β-glucosidase increases the rate of the cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis.

Authors:  Fábio K Tamaki; Éverton M Araujo; Roberto Rozenberg; Sandro R Marana
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2016-05-18

8.  Human Chitotriosidase Is an Endo-Processive Enzyme.

Authors:  Silja Kuusk; Morten Sørlie; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reassembly and co-crystallization of a family 9 processive endoglucanase from its component parts: structural and functional significance of the intermodular linker.

Authors:  Svetlana Petkun; Inna Rozman Grinberg; Raphael Lamed; Sadanari Jindou; Tal Burstein; Oren Yaniv; Yuval Shoham; Linda J W Shimon; Edward A Bayer; Felix Frolow
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Alleviating product inhibition in cellulase enzyme Cel7A.

Authors:  Meera E Atreya; Kathryn L Strobel; Douglas S Clark
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.