Literature DB >> 22607476

VIPER: a visualisation tool for exploring inheritance inconsistencies in genotyped pedigrees.

Trevor Paterson1, Martin Graham, Jessie Kennedy, Andy Law.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pedigree genotype datasets are used for analysing genetic inheritance and to map genetic markers and traits. Such datasets consist of hundreds of related animals genotyped for thousands of genetic markers and invariably contain multiple errors in both the pedigree structure and in the associated individual genotype data. These errors manifest as apparent inheritance inconsistencies in the pedigree, and invalidate analyses of marker inheritance patterns across the dataset. Cleaning raw datasets of bad data points (incorrect pedigree relationships, unreliable marker assays, suspect samples, bad genotype results etc.) requires expert exploration of the patterns of exposed inconsistencies in the context of the inheritance pedigree. In order to assist this process we are developing VIPER (Visual Pedigree Explorer), a software tool that integrates an inheritance-checking algorithm with a novel space-efficient pedigree visualisation, so that reported inheritance inconsistencies are overlaid on an interactive, navigable representation of the pedigree structure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This paper describes an evaluation of how VIPER displays the different scales and types of dataset that occur experimentally, with a description of how VIPER's display interface and functionality meet the challenges presented by such data. We examine a range of possible error types found in real and simulated pedigree genotype datasets, demonstrating how these errors are exposed and explored using the VIPER interface and we evaluate the utility and usability of the interface to the domain expert.Evaluation was performed as a two stage process with the assistance of domain experts (geneticists). The initial evaluation drove the iterative implementation of further features in the software prototype, as required by the users, prior to a final functional evaluation of the pedigree display for exploring the various error types, data scales and structures.
CONCLUSIONS: The VIPER display was shown to effectively expose the range of errors found in experimental genotyped pedigrees, allowing users to explore the underlying causes of reported inheritance inconsistencies. This interface will provide the basis for a full data cleaning tool that will allow the user to remove isolated bad data points, and reversibly test the effect of removing suspect genotypes and pedigree relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22607476      PMCID: PMC3355332          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S8-S5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  9 in total

1.  GeneaQuilts: a system for exploring large genealogies.

Authors:  Anastasia Bezerianos; Pierre Dragicevic; Jean-Daniel Fekete; Juhee Bae; Ben Watson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  PedVis: a structured, space-efficient technique for pedigree visualization.

Authors:  Claurissa Tuttle; Luis Gustavo Nonato; Cláudio T Silva
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.579

3.  Peditree: pedigree database analysis and visualization for breeding and science.

Authors:  R van Berloo; R C B Hutten
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  Evaluating visualizations: do expert reviews work?

Authors:  Melanie Tory; Torsten Möller
Journal:  IEEE Comput Graph Appl       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.088

5.  Genotyping errors, pedigree errors, and missing data.

Authors:  Anthony L Hinrichs; Brian K Suarez
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: update and assessment of the recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Robin L Bennett; Kathryn Steinhaus French; Robert G Resta; Debra Lochner Doyle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Genotypechecker: an interactive tool for checking the inheritance consistency of genotyped pedigrees.

Authors:  T Paterson; A Law
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Recommendations for standardized human pedigree nomenclature. Pedigree Standardization Task Force of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  R L Bennett; K A Steinhaus; S B Uhrich; C K O'Sullivan; R G Resta; D Lochner-Doyle; D S Markel; V Vincent; J Hamanishi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  PediDraw: a web-based tool for drawing a pedigree in genetic counseling.

Authors:  Min He; Wei Li
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.103

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Lineage: Visualizing Multivariate Clinical Data in Genealogy Graphs.

Authors:  Carolina Nobre; Nils Gehlenborg; Hilary Coon; Alexander Lex
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  Helium: visualization of large scale plant pedigrees.

Authors:  Paul D Shaw; Martin Graham; Jessie Kennedy; Iain Milne; David F Marshall
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  MaTSE: the gene expression time-series explorer.

Authors:  Paul Craig; Alan Cannon; Robert Kukla; Jessie Kennedy
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Extreme variation in recombination rate and genetic diversity along the Sylvioidea neo-sex chromosome.

Authors:  Suvi Ponnikas; Hanna Sigeman; Max Lundberg; Bengt Hansson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.622

5.  Genomic analysis of morphometric traits in bighorn sheep using the Ovine Infinium® HD SNP BeadChip.

Authors:  Joshua M Miller; Marco Festa-Bianchet; David W Coltman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.