Literature DB >> 7887430

Recommendations for standardized human pedigree nomenclature. Pedigree Standardization Task Force of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

R L Bennett1, K A Steinhaus, S B Uhrich, C K O'Sullivan, R G Resta, D Lochner-Doyle, D S Markel, V Vincent, J Hamanishi.   

Abstract

The construction of an accurate family pedigree is a fundamental component of a clinical genetic evaluation and of human genetic research. Previous surveys of genetic counselors and human genetic publications have demonstrated significant inconsistencies in the usage of common pedigree symbols representing situations such as pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, miscarriage, and adoption, as well as less common scenarios such as pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technologies. The Pedigree Standardization Task Force (PSTF) was organized through the Professional Issues Committee of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, to establish recommendations for universal standards in human pedigree nomenclature. Nomenclature was chosen based on current usage, consistency among symbols, computer compatibility, and the adaptability of symbols to reflect the rapid technical advances in human genetics. Preliminary recommendations were presented for review at three national meetings of human genetic professionals and sent to > 100 human genetic professionals for review. On the basis of this review process, the recommendations of the PSTF for standardized human pedigree nomenclature are presented here. By incorporating these recommendations into medical genetics professional training programs, board examinations, genetic publications, and pedigree software, the adoption of uniform pedigree nomenclature can begin. Usage of standardized pedigree nomenclature will reduce the chances for incorrect interpretation of patient and family medical and genetic information. It may also improve the quality of patient care provided by genetic professionals and facilitate communication between researchers involved with genetic family studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7887430      PMCID: PMC1801187     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  55 in total

Review 1.  Genetic counseling for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  D W Tsuang; S V Faraone; M T Tsuang
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Fabry disease in genetic counseling practice: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Robin L Bennett; Kimberly A Hart; Erin O'Rourke; John A Barranger; Jack Johnson; Kay D MacDermot; Gregory M Pastores; Robert D Steiner; Ravi Thadhani
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Neurogenetics: single gene disorders.

Authors:  S-M Pulst
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Genetic counselors: translating genomic science into clinical practice.

Authors:  Robin L Bennett; Heather L Hampel; Jessica B Mandell; Joan H Marks
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Lindsey Hoskins; Sheila Prindiville; Regina Kenen; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Sex symbols ancient and modern: their origins and iconography on the pedigree.

Authors:  G D Schott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-24

7.  Family history in primary care pediatrics.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Changing the definition of "proband" in the new standardized nomenclature for pedigrees.

Authors:  M L Marazita
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The family history: An integral component of paediatric health assessment.

Authors:  Andrea L Shugar
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 10.  Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy.

Authors:  Yaniv Erlich; Arvind Narayanan
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.