Literature DB >> 22595557

Multi-institutional follow-up of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia reveals severe disability and variations in practice.

Arash Safavi1, Anne R Synnes, Karel O'Brien, Monping Chiang, Erik D Skarsgard, Priscilla P L Chiu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) have a high incidence of morbidity. Variability in follow-up practices between institutions may affect perception of disability and prevent population-based outcome analysis.
METHODS: A survey of follow-up practices at 16 centers within a population-based CDH network was performed. A descriptive analysis of outcomes (minimum 24 months postdischarge) of CDH survivors from the 2 largest centers was performed.
RESULTS: The nature of follow-up of CDH survivors was highly variable in 12 of 16 responding centers, ranging from ad hoc, community-based, and pediatrician-sponsored follow-up to a single perinatal center-based multispecialty CDH clinic. Outcomes at 24 to 36 months were reported from the 2 largest centers (n = 44). Among survivors, neurodevelopmental disability was most common (12/44; 27%) followed by gastrointestinal (9; 20.5%), pulmonary (5; 11.4%), musculoskeletal (5; 11.4%), and cardiac (2; 4.5%). Additional surgery was required in 17 patients (38.6%), including recurrent CDH repair in 7 (15.9%). Five patients (11.4%) had hearing loss. Among 41 children with available 24-month data, 32 (78%), 17 (41.5%), and 14 (34.1%) patients had weights below the 50th, 25th, and 3rd percentiles, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivorship is associated with significant disability. Standardization of follow-up practices is essential to enable population-based outcomes analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22595557     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  13 in total

1.  Self-assessed physical health among children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Elin Öst; Maria Öjmyr Joelsson; Carmen Mesas Burgos; Björn Frenckner
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Evaluation, predictors and outcome.

Authors:  Enrico Danzer; Stephen S Kim
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-08

3.  Pulmonary support on day of life 30 is a strong predictor of increased 1 and 5-year morbidity in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Ryan P Cauley; Kristina Potanos; Nora Fullington; Sigrid Bairdain; Catherine A Sheils; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Dionne A Graham; Jay M Wilson
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Diagnosis and management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Pramod Puligandla; Erik Skarsgard; Martin Offringa; Ian Adatia; Robert Baird; Michelle Bailey; Mary Brindle; Priscilla Chiu; Arthur Cogswell; Shyamala Dakshinamurti; Hélène Flageole; Richard Keijzer; Douglas McMillan; Titilayo Oluyomi-Obi; Thomas Pennaforte; Thérèse Perreault; Bruno Piedboeuf; S. Patricia Riley; Greg Ryan; Anne Synnes; Michael Traynor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The Surgical Correction of Congenital Deformities: The Treatment of Diaphragmatic Hernia, Esophageal Atresia and Small Bowel Atresia.

Authors:  Lucas M Wessel; Jörg Fuchs; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Augusto Zani; Wendy K Chung; Jan Deprest; Matthew T Harting; Tim Jancelewicz; Shaun M Kunisaki; Neil Patel; Lina Antounians; Pramod S Puligandla; Richard Keijzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  Analysis of perceived risk and satisfaction with telematic follow-up in patients and families of congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients during SARS-CoV-2 pandemia.

Authors:  J A Molino; G Guillén; O Rocha; B Oliver; S López Fernández; H A Khan; I de Mir; I Iglesias; M López
Journal:  J Healthc Qual Res       Date:  2022-06-23

8.  Developmental outcomes of children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Gudrun Aspelund; Annette Zygmunt; Charles J H Stolar; George Mychaliska; Jennifer Butcher; Foong-Yen Lim; Teresa Gratton; Douglas Potoka; Kate Brennan; Ken Azarow; Barbara Jackson; Howard Needelman; Timothy Crombleholme; Yuan Zhang; Jimmy Duong; Marc S Arkovitz; Wendy K Chung; Christiana Farkouh
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Tissue Engineering to Repair Diaphragmatic Defect in a Rat Model.

Authors:  G P Liao; Y Choi; K Vojnits; H Xue; K Aroom; F Meng; H Y Pan; R A Hetz; C J Corkins; T G Hughes; F Triolo; A Johnson; Kenneth J Moise; K P Lally; C S Cox; Y Li
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Health-related quality of life in children born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Elin Öst; Björn Frenckner; Margret Nisell; Carmen Mesas Burgos; Maria Öjmyr-Joelsson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.