Literature DB >> 22594495

Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity.

Paula M Petrone1, Benjamin Simms, Florian Nigsch, Eugen Lounkine, Peter Kutchukian, Allen Cornett, Zhan Deng, John W Davies, Jeremy L Jenkins, Meir Glick.   

Abstract

Since the advent of high-throughput screening (HTS), there has been an urgent need for methods that facilitate the interrogation of large-scale chemical biology data to build a mode of action (MoA) hypothesis. This can be done either prior to the HTS by subset design of compounds with known MoA or post HTS by data annotation and mining. To enable this process, we developed a tool that compares compounds solely on the basis of their bioactivity: the chemical biological descriptor "high-throughput screening fingerprint" (HTS-FP). In the current embodiment, data are aggregated from 195 biochemical and cell-based assays developed at Novartis and can be used to identify bioactivity relationships among the in-house collection comprising ~1.5 million compounds. We demonstrate the value of the HTS-FP for virtual screening and in particular scaffold hopping. HTS-FP outperforms state of the art methods in several aspects, retrieving bioactive compounds with remarkable chemical dissimilarity to a probe structure. We also apply HTS-FP for the design of screening subsets in HTS. Using retrospective data, we show that a biodiverse selection of plates performs significantly better than a chemically diverse selection of plates, both in terms of number of hits and diversity of chemotypes retrieved. This is also true in the case of hit expansion predictions using HTS-FP similarity. Sets of compounds clustered with HTS-FP are biologically meaningful, in the sense that these clusters enrich for genes and gene ontology (GO) terms, showing that compounds that are bioactively similar also tend to target proteins that operate together in the cell. HTS-FP are valuable not only because of their predictive power but mainly because they relate compounds solely on the basis of bioactivity, harnessing the accumulated knowledge of a high-throughput screening facility toward the understanding of how compounds interact with the proteome.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22594495     DOI: 10.1021/cb3001028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Biol        ISSN: 1554-8929            Impact factor:   5.100


  44 in total

1.  Dark chemical matter as a promising starting point for drug lead discovery.

Authors:  Anne Mai Wassermann; Eugen Lounkine; Dominic Hoepfner; Gaelle Le Goff; Frederick J King; Christian Studer; John M Peltier; Melissa L Grippo; Vivian Prindle; Jianshi Tao; Ansgar Schuffenhauer; Iain M Wallace; Shanni Chen; Philipp Krastel; Amanda Cobos-Correa; Christian N Parker; John W Davies; Meir Glick
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 15.040

2.  A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs).

Authors:  Christiane Ehrt; Tobias Brinkjost; Oliver Koch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Computational studies to predict or explain G protein coupled receptor polypharmacology.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jacobson; Stefano Costanzi; Silvia Paoletta
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 4.  Advancing Biological Understanding and Therapeutics Discovery with Small-Molecule Probes.

Authors:  Stuart L Schreiber; Joanne D Kotz; Min Li; Jeffrey Aubé; Christopher P Austin; John C Reed; Hugh Rosen; E Lucile White; Larry A Sklar; Craig W Lindsley; Benjamin R Alexander; Joshua A Bittker; Paul A Clemons; Andrea de Souza; Michael A Foley; Michelle Palmer; Alykhan F Shamji; Mathias J Wawer; Owen McManus; Meng Wu; Beiyan Zou; Haibo Yu; Jennifer E Golden; Frank J Schoenen; Anton Simeonov; Ajit Jadhav; Michael R Jackson; Anthony B Pinkerton; Thomas D Y Chung; Patrick R Griffin; Benjamin F Cravatt; Peter S Hodder; William R Roush; Edward Roberts; Dong-Hoon Chung; Colleen B Jonsson; James W Noah; William E Severson; Subramaniam Ananthan; Bruce Edwards; Tudor I Oprea; P Jeffrey Conn; Corey R Hopkins; Michael R Wood; Shaun R Stauffer; Kyle A Emmitte
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Predicting protein-ligand affinity with a random matrix framework.

Authors:  Alpha A Lee; Michael P Brenner; Lucy J Colwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  QSAR model based on weighted MCS trees approach for the representation of molecule data sets.

Authors:  Bernardo Palacios-Bejarano; Gonzalo Cerruela García; Irene Luque Ruiz; Miguel Ángel Gómez-Nieto
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Metal impurities cause false positives in high-throughput screening campaigns.

Authors:  Johannes C Hermann; Yingsi Chen; Charles Wartchow; John Menke; Lin Gao; Shelley K Gleason; Nancy-Ellen Haynes; Nathan Scott; Ann Petersen; Stephen Gabriel; Binh Vu; Kelly M George; Arjun Narayanan; Shirley H Li; Hong Qian; Nanda Beatini; Linghao Niu; Qing-Fen Gan
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 8.  Integrating phenotypic small-molecule profiling and human genetics: the next phase in drug discovery.

Authors:  Cory M Johannessen; Paul A Clemons; Bridget K Wagner
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  An informatic pipeline for managing high-throughput screening experiments and analyzing data from stereochemically diverse libraries.

Authors:  Carol A Mulrooney; David L Lahr; Michael J Quintin; Willmen Youngsaye; Dennis Moccia; Jacob K Asiedu; Evan L Mulligan; Lakshmi B Akella; Lisa A Marcaurelle; Philip Montgomery; Joshua A Bittker; Paul A Clemons; Stephen Brudz; Sivaraman Dandapani; Jeremy R Duvall; Nicola J Tolliday; Andrea De Souza
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Connecting Small Molecules with Similar Assay Performance Profiles Leads to New Biological Hypotheses.

Authors:  Vlado Dančík; Hyman Carrel; Nicole E Bodycombe; Kathleen Petri Seiler; Dina Fomina-Yadlin; Stefan T Kubicek; Kimberly Hartwell; Alykhan F Shamji; Bridget K Wagner; Paul A Clemons
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2014-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.