Literature DB >> 22590116

Poly[bis-(1-carbamoylguanidinium) [tri-μ-chlorido-dichloridobismuthate(III)]].

Hel Ferjani1, Habib Boughzala, Ahmed Driss.   

Abstract

The structure of the title organic-inorganic hybrid compound, {(C(2)H(7)N(4)O)(2)[BiCl(5)]}(n), consists of corrugated chains parallel to [100] of corner-joined [BiCl(6)] octa-hedra, separated by layers of organic 1-carbamoylguanidinum cations. The crystal cohesion is achieved by N-H⋯O and N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, which link the organic and inorganic parts of the structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22590116      PMCID: PMC3344350          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For bis­muth(III) halide organic–inorganic hybrid compounds, see: Masmoudi et al. (2011 ▶); Fisher & Norman (1994 ▶); Samet et al. (2010 ▶); Papavassiliou et al. (1995 ▶); Mousdis et al. (1998 ▶); Rhandour et al. (2011 ▶). For structures with similar guanidunium cations, see: Bremner & Harrison (2002 ▶, 2003 ▶); Ritchie & Harrison (2003 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C2H7N4O)2[BiCl5] M = 592.46 Orthorhombic, a = 7.3795 (8) Å b = 20.706 (4) Å c = 11.028 (2) Å V = 1685.1 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 11.27 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.53 × 0.25 × 0.17 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.048, T max = 0.094 2612 measured reflections 1880 independent reflections 1596 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.018 2 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 5%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029 wR(F 2) = 0.080 S = 1.10 1880 reflections 98 parameters H-atom parameters not refined Δρmax = 3.03 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.73 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Duisenberg, 1992 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015668/bg2453sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015668/bg2453Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C2H7N4O)2[BiCl5]F(000) = 1112
Mr = 592.46Dx = 2.335 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2nCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 7.3795 (8) Åθ = 11–15°
b = 20.706 (4) ŵ = 11.27 mm1
c = 11.028 (2) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1685.1 (5) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.53 × 0.25 × 0.17 mm
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1596 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.018
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.1°
Non–profiled ω/2θ scansh = −1→9
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = −2→26
Tmin = 0.048, Tmax = 0.094l = −1→14
2612 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
1880 independent reflections intensity decay: 5%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029H-atom parameters not refined
wR(F2) = 0.080w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0464P)2 + 4.6267P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1880 reflectionsΔρmax = 3.03 e Å3
98 parametersΔρmin = −1.73 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0022 (2)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Bi0.62878 (4)0.25000.56736 (2)0.02190 (13)
Cl10.6373 (2)0.38017 (8)0.56635 (13)0.0404 (4)
Cl20.9594 (3)0.25000.7064 (2)0.0449 (5)
Cl30.3456 (3)0.25000.4355 (2)0.0405 (5)
Cl40.8594 (3)0.25000.3856 (2)0.0388 (5)
C10.1598 (8)0.4240 (3)0.5363 (6)0.0334 (13)
C20.1179 (8)0.4174 (3)0.3141 (6)0.0338 (13)
O0.2300 (8)0.4830 (3)0.5350 (5)0.0581 (14)
N10.1374 (9)0.3932 (3)0.6381 (6)0.0543 (17)
H1A0.16810.41110.70540.065*
H1B0.09180.35500.63810.065*
N20.1010 (8)0.3947 (3)0.4317 (4)0.0376 (13)
H20.04730.35810.44020.045*
N30.1813 (7)0.4699 (2)0.2905 (5)0.0326 (11)
H3A0.18820.48250.21630.039*
H3B0.21940.49460.34790.039*
N40.0551 (9)0.3755 (3)0.2320 (5)0.0490 (15)
H4A0.05800.38510.15620.059*
H4B0.01180.33890.25500.059*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Bi0.02407 (18)0.02518 (17)0.01645 (17)0.0000.00075 (11)0.000
Cl10.0613 (11)0.0279 (7)0.0319 (8)−0.0047 (7)−0.0009 (7)0.0008 (5)
Cl20.0457 (13)0.0501 (12)0.0388 (12)0.000−0.0197 (11)0.000
Cl30.0327 (11)0.0473 (13)0.0416 (13)0.000−0.0128 (9)0.000
Cl40.0432 (12)0.0433 (11)0.0300 (11)0.0000.0137 (9)0.000
C10.034 (3)0.036 (3)0.030 (3)0.000 (2)0.004 (3)0.002 (3)
C20.035 (3)0.035 (3)0.031 (3)0.002 (2)0.007 (2)−0.003 (2)
O0.065 (4)0.049 (3)0.060 (3)−0.005 (3)−0.003 (3)0.002 (3)
N10.071 (4)0.058 (4)0.033 (3)−0.015 (3)−0.005 (3)0.010 (3)
N20.052 (3)0.028 (3)0.033 (3)−0.008 (2)0.003 (2)0.0019 (19)
N30.049 (3)0.027 (2)0.022 (2)−0.010 (2)0.003 (2)0.007 (2)
N40.071 (4)0.047 (3)0.029 (3)−0.017 (3)0.008 (3)−0.007 (2)
Bi—Cl32.546 (3)C2—N31.213 (8)
Bi—Cl42.630 (2)C2—N41.337 (8)
Bi—Cl1i2.6961 (17)C2—N21.384 (8)
Bi—Cl12.6962 (17)N1—H1A0.8600
Bi—Cl2ii2.791 (2)N1—H1B0.8600
Bi—Cl22.881 (3)N2—H20.8600
Cl2—Biiii2.791 (2)N3—H3A0.8600
C1—N11.302 (9)N3—H3B0.8600
C1—O1.327 (8)N4—H4A0.8600
C1—N21.373 (8)N4—H4B0.8600
Cl3—Bi—Cl495.50 (10)N1—C1—N2117.9 (6)
Cl3—Bi—Cl1i90.96 (4)O—C1—N2121.4 (6)
Cl4—Bi—Cl1i88.95 (3)N3—C2—N4124.7 (6)
Cl3—Bi—Cl190.96 (4)N3—C2—N2122.7 (6)
Cl4—Bi—Cl188.95 (4)N4—C2—N2112.6 (5)
Cl1i—Bi—Cl1177.28 (8)C1—N1—H1A120.0
Cl3—Bi—Cl2ii98.22 (9)C1—N1—H1B120.0
Cl4—Bi—Cl2ii166.28 (8)H1A—N1—H1B120.0
Cl1i—Bi—Cl2ii90.81 (3)C1—N2—C2127.5 (6)
Cl1—Bi—Cl2ii90.81 (3)C1—N2—H2116.3
Cl3—Bi—Cl2177.32 (7)C2—N2—H2116.3
Cl4—Bi—Cl281.82 (10)C2—N3—H3A120.0
Cl1i—Bi—Cl288.99 (4)C2—N3—H3B120.0
Cl1—Bi—Cl288.99 (4)H3A—N3—H3B120.0
Cl2ii—Bi—Cl284.47 (6)C2—N4—H4A120.0
Biiii—Cl2—Bi148.77 (10)C2—N4—H4B120.0
N1—C1—O120.6 (7)H4A—N4—H4B120.0
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl1ii0.862.613.271 (8)135
N1—H1B···Cl2iv0.862.503.329 (7)162
N2—H2···Cl4iv0.862.703.524 (7)160
N3—H3A···Ov0.862.213.053 (8)167
N3—H3B···O0.862.082.734 (8)132
N4—H4A···Cl1vi0.862.533.347 (7)160
N4—H4B···Cl4iv0.862.593.421 (7)162
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1i0.862.613.271 (8)135
N1—H1B⋯Cl2ii0.862.503.329 (7)162
N2—H2⋯Cl4ii0.862.703.524 (7)160
N3—H3A⋯Oiii0.862.213.053 (8)167
N3—H3B⋯O0.862.082.734 (8)132
N4—H4A⋯Cl1iv0.862.533.347 (7)160
N4—H4B⋯Cl4ii0.862.593.421 (7)162

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  1 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  One-Dimensional Organic-Inorganic Material (C6H9N2)2BiCl5: From Synthesis to Structural, Spectroscopic, and Electronic Characterizations.

Authors:  Hela Ferjani; Hammouda Chebbi; Mohammed Fettouhi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  New Organic-Inorganic Salt Based on Fluconazole Drug: TD-DFT Benchmark and Computational Insights into Halogen Substitution.

Authors:  Hela Ferjani; Rim Bechaieb; Marzook Alshammari; O M Lemine; Necmi Dege
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Crystal structure of the new hybrid material bis-(1,4-diazo-niabi-cyclo-[2.2.2]octa-ne) di-μ-chlorido-bis-[tetra-chlorido-bis-muthate(III)] dihydrate.

Authors:  Marwen Chouri; Habib Boughzala
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-10-28

4.  Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a polymeric bis-muthate(III) halide complex, (C6H6N3)2[BiCl5]·2H2O.

Authors:  Chaima Boukoum; Zouhaier Aloui; Valeria Ferretti; Sonia Abid
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2017-10-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.