Literature DB >> 22589082

Effects of age on genetic influence on bone loss over 17 years in women: the Healthy Ageing Twin Study (HATS).

Alireza Moayyeri1, Christopher J Hammond, Deborah J Hart, Timothy D Spector.   

Abstract

The rate of bone loss varies across the aging period via multiple complex mechanisms. Therefore, the role of genetic factors on bone loss may also change similarly. In this study, we investigated the effect of age on the genetic component of bone loss in a large twin-based longitudinal study. During 17 years of follow-up in TwinsUK and Healthy Ageing Twin Study (HATS), 15,491 hip and lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed in 7056 twins. Out of these subjects, 2716 female twins aged >35 years with at least two scans separated for >4 years (mean follow-up 9.7 years) were included in this analysis. We used a mixed-effects random-coefficients regression model to predict hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) values for exact ages of 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80 years, with adjustment for baseline age, weight, height, and duration of hormone replacement therapy. We then estimated heritability of the changes in BMD measures between these age ranges. Heritability estimates for cross-sectional hip and spine BMD were high (ranging between 69% and 88%) at different ages. Heritability of change of BMD was lower and more variable, generally ranging from 0% to 40% for hip and 0% to 70% for spine; between age 40 and 45 years genetic factors explained 39.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-53%) of variance of BMD loss for total hip, 46.4% (95% CI, 32%-58%) for femoral neck, and 69.5% (95% CI, 59%-77%) for lumbar spine. These estimates decreased with increasing age, and there appeared to be no heritability of BMD changes after the age of 65 years. There was some evidence at the spine for shared genetic effects between cross-sectional and longitudinal BMD. Whereas genetic factors appear to have an important role in bone loss in early postmenopausal women, nongenetic mechanisms become more important determinants of bone loss with advanced age.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22589082     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  21 in total

1.  Trabecular microstructure is influenced by race and sex in Black and White young adults.

Authors:  K L Popp; C Xu; A Yuan; J M Hughes; G Unnikrishnan; J Reifman; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Healthy ageing twin study reveals role of genetic factors on BMD.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2012-08-08

Review 3.  Genetics of aging bone.

Authors:  Douglas J Adams; David W Rowe; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Genomics and metabolomics of muscular mass in a community-based sample of UK females.

Authors:  Michael Korostishevsky; Claire J Steves; Ida Malkin; Timothy Spector; Frances M K Williams; Gregory Livshits
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  [Regulation of bone metabolism in osteoporosis : novel drugs for osteoporosis in development].

Authors:  F Jakob; F Genest; G Baron; U Stumpf; M Rudert; L Seefried
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Twin studies for the prognosis, prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Lucas Calais-Ferreira; Vinicius C Oliveira; Jeffrey M Craig; Louisa B Flander; John L Hopper; Luci F Teixeira-Salmela; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Recent advances: osteoporosis in the "oldest old".

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  The genetic architecture of the human immune system: a bioresource for autoimmunity and disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Mario Roederer; Lydia Quaye; Massimo Mangino; Margaret H Beddall; Yolanda Mahnke; Pratip Chattopadhyay; Isabella Tosi; Luca Napolitano; Manuela Terranova Barberio; Cristina Menni; Federica Villanova; Paola Di Meglio; Tim D Spector; Frank O Nestle
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  The case for genome-wide association studies of bone acquisition in paediatric and adolescent populations.

Authors:  John P Kemp; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Jonathan H Tobias; Fernando Rivadeneira; David M Evans
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-05-25

10.  Discovery and refinement of genetic loci associated with cardiometabolic risk using dense imputation maps.

Authors:  Alexander P Reiner; Paul L Auer; Nicole Soranzo; Valentina Iotchkova; Jie Huang; John A Morris; Deepti Jain; Caterina Barbieri; Klaudia Walter; Josine L Min; Lu Chen; William Astle; Massimilian Cocca; Patrick Deelen; Heather Elding; Aliki-Eleni Farmaki; Christopher S Franklin; Mattias Franberg; Tom R Gaunt; Albert Hofman; Tao Jiang; Marcus E Kleber; Genevieve Lachance; Jian'an Luan; Giovanni Malerba; Angela Matchan; Daniel Mead; Yasin Memari; Ioanna Ntalla; Kalliope Panoutsopoulou; Raha Pazoki; John R B Perry; Fernando Rivadeneira; Maria Sabater-Lleal; Bengt Sennblad; So-Youn Shin; Lorraine Southam; Michela Traglia; Freerk van Dijk; Elisabeth M van Leeuwen; Gianluigi Zaza; Weihua Zhang; Najaf Amin; Adam Butterworth; John C Chambers; George Dedoussis; Abbas Dehghan; Oscar H Franco; Lude Franke; Mattia Frontini; Giovanni Gambaro; Paolo Gasparini; Anders Hamsten; Aaron Issacs; Jaspal S Kooner; Charles Kooperberg; Claudia Langenberg; Winfried Marz; Robert A Scott; Morris A Swertz; Daniela Toniolo; Andre G Uitterlinden; Cornelia M van Duijn; Hugh Watkins; Eleftheria Zeggini; Mathew T Maurano; Nicholas J Timpson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.