PURPOSE: To elucidate whether adjuvant taxane monotherapy is a feasible and tolerable for postoperative breast cancer patients, we evaluated the severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and the relative tolerability of regimens by health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with taxane-containing regimens. METHODS: We evaluated CIPN and HRQOL in the first 300 patients enrolled in a larger (1,060 total) multicenter phase III trial randomized to one of four adjuvant regimens: (1) anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ACP), (2) AC followed by docetaxel (ACD), (3) paclitaxel alone (PTX), or (4) docetaxel alone (DTX). CIPN was assessed by the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) and the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, and HRQOL by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). CIPN and HRQOL scores were compared between ACP and ACD vs. PTX and DTX, and ACP and PTX vs. ACD and DTX. RESULTS:PNQ sensory scores were significantly higher in patients treated with taxane monotherapy compared to treatment with AC followed by taxane (P = .003). No significant differences in PNQ sensory scores were observed between the ACP and PTX vs. ACD and DTX regimens (P = .669). Regardless of taxane regimen, PNQ severity scores for CIPN appear to be largely reversible within 1 year of adjuvant treatment. No significant difference in FACT-G scores was observed between any regimens during the study treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported CIPN was significantly more severe with single-agent adjuvant taxane compared to AC followed by taxane treatment; however, the HRQOL findings support that single-agent taxane treatment is tolerable.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To elucidate whether adjuvant taxane monotherapy is a feasible and tolerable for postoperative breast cancerpatients, we evaluated the severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and the relative tolerability of regimens by health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment in node-positive breast cancerpatients treated with taxane-containing regimens. METHODS: We evaluated CIPN and HRQOL in the first 300 patients enrolled in a larger (1,060 total) multicenter phase III trial randomized to one of four adjuvant regimens: (1) anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ACP), (2) AC followed by docetaxel (ACD), (3) paclitaxel alone (PTX), or (4) docetaxel alone (DTX). CIPN was assessed by the PatientNeurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) and the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, and HRQOL by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). CIPN and HRQOL scores were compared between ACP and ACD vs. PTX and DTX, and ACP and PTX vs. ACD and DTX. RESULTS:PNQ sensory scores were significantly higher in patients treated with taxane monotherapy compared to treatment with AC followed by taxane (P = .003). No significant differences in PNQ sensory scores were observed between the ACP and PTX vs. ACD and DTX regimens (P = .669). Regardless of taxane regimen, PNQ severity scores for CIPN appear to be largely reversible within 1 year of adjuvant treatment. No significant difference in FACT-G scores was observed between any regimens during the study treatments. CONCLUSIONS:Patient-reported CIPN was significantly more severe with single-agent adjuvant taxane compared to AC followed by taxane treatment; however, the HRQOL findings support that single-agent taxane treatment is tolerable.
Authors: S E Jones; J Erban; B Overmoyer; G T Budd; L Hutchins; E Lower; L Laufman; S Sundaram; W J Urba; K I Pritchard; R Mennel; D Richards; S Olsen; M L Meyers; P M Ravdin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeff A Sloan; Lawrence Berk; Joseph Roscoe; Michael J Fisch; Edward G Shaw; Gwen Wyatt; Gary R Morrow; Amylou C Dueck Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Kelley M Kidwell; Kiran Vangipuram; Feng Li; Manjunath P Pai; Monika Burness; Jennifer J Griggs; Anne F Schott; Catherine Van Poznak; Daniel F Hayes; Ellen M Lavoie Smith; N Lynn Henry Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paul Lennart Vollmers; Christoph Mundhenke; Nicolai Maass; Dirk Bauerschlag; Stefan Kratzenstein; Christoph Röcken; Thorsten Schmidt Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Weidong Lu; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Rachel A Freedman; Im Hee Shin; Nancy U Lin; Ann H Partridge; David S Rosenthal; Jennifer A Ligibel Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-14
Authors: Ellen M Lavoie Smith; Herbert Pang; Constance Cirrincione; Stewart Fleishman; Electra D Paskett; Tim Ahles; Linda R Bressler; Camilo E Fadul; Chetaye Knox; Nguyet Le-Lindqwister; Paul B Gilman; Charles L Shapiro Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Floortje Mols; Tonneke Beijers; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Weidong Lu; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Rachel A Freedman; Im Hee Shin; Nancy U Lin; Ann H Partridge; David S Rosenthal; Jennifer A Ligibel Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-14
Authors: R Michael Baldwin; Kouros Owzar; Hitoshi Zembutsu; Aparna Chhibber; Michiaki Kubo; Chen Jiang; Dorothy Watson; Rachel J Eclov; Joel Mefford; Howard L McLeod; Paula N Friedman; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer; Eric M Jorgenson; John S Witte; Lawrence N Shulman; Yusuke Nakamura; Mark J Ratain; Deanna L Kroetz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 12.531