Literature DB >> 24880670

Evaluation of the health-related quality of life for patients following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Masaji Tani1, Manabu Kawai, Ken-Ichi Okada, Seiko Hirono, Tsukasa Hotta, Katsunari Takifuji, Hiroki Yamaue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the standard procedure, and contributes to a shorter hospital stay. However, there have been no reports regarding when the patients can be discharged in terms of their health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
METHODS: The HRQOL was evaluated by using the SF-8 health survey (SF-8) 24-hour version in 127 consecutive patients treated from May 2007 to December 2008. The HRQOL and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score were assessed on the day before surgery and on postoperative day (POD) 1, POD2 and POD7.
RESULTS: All scores of the eight domains on POD1 were significantly decreased compared to the preoperative score (P < 0.05), and seven scores were still decreased on POD2, with the mental health (MH) domain showing an improvement. On POD7, the general health score improved to the preoperative level. The physical component summary 8 (PCS-8) was suppressed for all 7 days after LC. The mental health component summary 8 (MCS-8) was improved to the preoperative level on POD2, despite the significant suppression observed on POD1 (P < 0.05). The VAS score was higher in the low PCS-8 (PCS-8 < 42.4) and low MCS-8 (MCS-8 < 40.6) patients than in the high PCS-8 and high MCS-8 patients.
CONCLUSION: The HRQOL score demonstrated the improvement of the MCS-8 on POD2, which might suggest that a discharge of LC patients is appropriate on POD2 in terms of the patients' point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880670     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0938-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  18 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  A Ros; L Gustafsson; H Krook; C E Nordgren; A Thorell; G Wallin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  J Harju; H Kokki; M Pääkkönen; K Karjalainen; M Eskelinen
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.360

3.  Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mohamed E Abd Ellatif; Waleed A Askar; Ashraf E Abbas; Nashat Noaman; Ahmed Negm; Gamal El-Morsy; Ayman El Nakeeb; Alaa Magdy; Mahmoud Amin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  V L Wills; D R Hunt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Spencer S Liu; Christopher L Wu
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hironobu Onishi; Masaji Tani; Hiroyuki Kinoshita; Masaki Ueno; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

7.  Usefulness of the SF-8 Health Survey for comparing the impact of migraine and other conditions.

Authors:  Diane M Turner-Bowker; Martha S Bayliss; John E Ware; Mark Kosinski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masaji Tani; Manabu Kawai; Hiroshi Terasawa; Takashi Hama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-11-30

9.  Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; J N Baxter; S Ross; J R Anderson; C G Morran; G Sunderland; D Galloway; G Ramsay; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Psychometric properties of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), Japanese version.

Authors:  Yoshimi Suzukamo; Tetsuro Oshika; Mitsuko Yuzawa; Yoshihiro Tokuda; Atsuo Tomidokoro; Kotaro Oki; Carol M Mangione; Joseph Green; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery program is safe and improves postoperative insulin resistance in gastrectomy.

Authors:  Nobuaki Fujikuni; Kazuaki Tanabe; Noriaki Tokumoto; Takahisa Suzuki; Minoru Hattori; Toshihiro Misumi; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 2.  A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and quality of life reporting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Prita Daliya; Elizabeth H Gemmill; Dileep N Lobo; Simon L Parsons
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.