Literature DB >> 22583906

Kinematic evaluation of patients with total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty during rehabilitation exercises with different loads.

Joelly Mahnic de Toledo1, Jefferson Fagundes Loss, Thomas W Janssen, Jan W van der Scheer, Tjarco D Alta, W Jaap Willems, DirkJan H E J Veeger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following shoulder arthroplasty, any well-planned rehabilitation program should include muscle strengthening. However, it is not always clear how different external loads influence shoulder kinematics in patients with shoulder prostheses. The objective of this study was to describe shoulder kinematics and determine the contribution of the scapulothoracic joint to total shoulder motion of patients with total and reverse shoulder arthroplasties and of healthy individuals during rehabilitation exercises (anteflexion and elevation in the scapular plane) using different loading conditions (without external load, 1 kg and elastic resistance).
METHODS: Shoulder motions were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device. A force transducer was used to record force signals during loaded conditions using elastic resistance. Statistical comparisons were made using a three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post hoc testing.
FINDINGS: The scapula contributed more to movement of the arm in subjects with prostheses compared to healthy subjects. The same applies for loaded conditions (1 kg and elastic resistance) relative to unloaded tasks. For scapular internal rotation, upward rotation and posterior tilt no significant differences among groups were found during both exercises. Glenohumeral elevation angles during anteflexion were significantly higher in the total shoulder arthroplasty group compared to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group.
INTERPRETATION: Differences in contribution of the scapula to total shoulder motion between patients with different types of arthroplasties were not significant. However, compared to healthy subjects, they were. Furthermore, scapular kinematics of patients with shoulder arthroplasty was influenced by implementation of external loads, but not by the type of load.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22583906     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  Defining the shape of the scapulothoracic gliding surface.

Authors:  Tomas Paquet; Robin Van Den Broecke; Stijn Casier; Jan Van Houcke; Lieven De Wilde; Alexander Van Tongel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Return of Scapulohumeral Rhythm in Patients After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Midterm Stereoradiographic Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  Shannon E Linderman; James R L Hall; Joshua E Johnson; Andrea P Caceres; Carolyn M Hettrich; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

3.  A randomised trial comparing two rehabilitation approaches following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter K Edwards; Jay R Ebert; Brendan Joss; Timothy Ackland; Allan Wang
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

4.  Anatomic total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tyler W Knighton; Peter N Chalmers; Hema J Sulkar; Klevis Aliaj; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.507

Review 5.  Effectiveness of formal physical therapy following total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter K Edwards; Jay R Ebert; Chris Littlewood; Tim Ackland; Allan Wang
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-11-25

6.  Dynamic thoracohumeral kinematics are dependent upon the etiology of the shoulder injury.

Authors:  Juan López-Pascual; Álvaro Page; Pilar Serra-Añó
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of the kinematics and kinetics of shoulder exercises performed with constant and elastic resistance.

Authors:  Ramona Häberle; Florian Schellenberg; Renate List; Michael Plüss; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-28

8.  Age-related differences in humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral kinematics during elevation and rotation motions.

Authors:  Christopher W Kolz; Hema J Sulkar; Klevis Aliaj; Robert Z Tashjian; Peter N Chalmers; Yuqing Qiu; Yue Zhang; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Chest Exercises: Movement and Loading of Shoulder, Elbow and Wrist Joints.

Authors:  Pascal Schütz; Pia Zimmer; Fabian Zeidler; Michael Plüss; Katja Oberhofer; Renate List; Silvio Rene Lorenzetti
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31

10.  Three-dimensional kinematics of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between shoulders with good or poor elevation.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Shota Hoshika; Yusuke Ueda; Morihito Tokai; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Scott A Banks
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.