Literature DB >> 33517243

Age-related differences in humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral kinematics during elevation and rotation motions.

Christopher W Kolz1, Hema J Sulkar1, Klevis Aliaj1, Robert Z Tashjian2, Peter N Chalmers2, Yuqing Qiu3, Yue Zhang3, K Bo Foreman4, Andrew E Anderson5, Heath B Henninger6.   

Abstract

Age affects gross shoulder range of motion (ROM), but biomechanical changes over a lifetime are typically only characterized for the humerothoracic joint. Suitable age-related baselines for the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to humerothoracic motion are needed to advance understanding of shoulder injuries and pathology. Notably, biomechanical comparisons between younger or older populations may obscure detected differences in underlying shoulder motion. Herein, biplane fluoroscopy and skin-marker motion analysis quantified humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral motion during 3 static poses (resting neutral, internal rotation to L4-L5, and internal rotation to maximum reach) and 2 dynamic activities (scapular plane abduction and external rotation in adduction). Orientations during static poses and rotations during active ROM were compared between subjects <35 years and >45 years of age (N = 10 subjects per group). Numerous age-related kinematic differences were measured, ranging 5-22°, where variations in scapular orientation and motion were consistently observed. These disparities are on par with or exceed mean clinically important differences and standard error of measurement of clinical ROM, which indicates that high resolution techniques and appropriately matched controls are required to avoid confounding results of studies that investigate shoulder kinematics. Understanding these dissimilarities will help clinicians manage expectations and treatment protocols where indications and prevalence between age groups tend to differ. Where possible, it is advised to select age-matched control cohorts when studying the kinematics of shoulder injury, pathology, or surgical/physical therapy interventions to ensure clinically important differences are not overlooked.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abduction; Age; Kinematics; Rotation; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33517243      PMCID: PMC7924070          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  46 in total

Review 1.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The role of the scapula.

Authors:  Russ Paine; Michael L Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

3.  Preoperative patient expectations of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Frank Henn; Hassan Ghomrawi; John R Rutledge; Madhu Mazumdar; Carol A Mancuso; Robert G Marx
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Scapular behavior in shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Luc J Hébert; Hélène Moffet; Bradford J McFadyen; Clermont E Dionne
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Reliable interpretation of scapular kinematics depends on coordinate system definition.

Authors:  Christopher W Kolz; Hema J Sulkar; Klevis Aliaj; Robert Z Tashjian; Peter N Chalmers; Yuqing Qiu; Yue Zhang; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 6.  Clinical examination of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Reg B Wilcox; Jeffrey N Katz; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Scapulohumeral rhythm relative to active range of motion in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Xavier Robert-Lachaine; Paul Allard; Véronique Godbout; Patrice Tétreault; Mickael Begon
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Factors that predict postoperative motion in patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Grant Schwartz; Benjamin J Cottrell; Matthew J Teusink; Rachel E Clark; Katheryne L Downes; Richard S Tannenbaum; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Risk of insufficient internal rotation after bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and patient-reported outcome in 57 patients.

Authors:  Barbara Wirth; Christoph Kolling; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Matthias Flury; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Shoulder motion and muscle strength of normal men and women in two age groups.

Authors:  M P Murray; D R Gore; G M Gardner; L A Mollinger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Anatomic total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tyler W Knighton; Peter N Chalmers; Hema J Sulkar; Klevis Aliaj; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.507

3.  Kinematic coupling of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints generates humeral axial rotation.

Authors:  Klevis Aliaj; Rebekah L Lawrence; K Bo Foreman; Peter N Chalmers; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Proximal humeral coordinate systems can predict humerothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics of a full bone system.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Jared L Zitnay; Klevis Aliaj; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.746

5.  Beyond Euler/Cardan analysis: True glenohumeral axial rotation during arm elevation and rotation.

Authors:  Klevis Aliaj; K Bo Foreman; Peter N Chalmers; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.746

6.  In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.424

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.