Amino acid side-chain conformational properties influence the overall structural and dynamic properties of proteins and, therefore, their biological functions. In this study, quantum mechanical (QM) potential energy surfaces for the rotation of side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) torsions in dipeptides in the alphaR, beta, and alphaL backbone conformations were calculated. The QM energy surfaces provide a broad view of the intrinsic conformational properties of each amino acid side-chain. The extent to which intrinsic energetics dictates side-chain orientation was studied through comparisons of the QM energy surfaces with χ(1) and χ(2) free energy surfaces from probability distributions obtained from a survey of high resolution crystal structures. In general, the survey probability maxima are centered in minima of the QM surfaces as expected for sp(3) (or sp(2) for χ(2) of Asn, Phe, Trp, and Tyr) atom centers with strong variations between amino acids occurring in the energies of the minima indicating intrinsic differences in rotamer preferences. High correlations between the QM and survey data were found for hydrophobic side-chains except Met, suggesting minimal influence of the protein and solution environments on their conformational distributions. Conversely, low correlations for polar or charged side-chains indicate a dominant role of the environment in stabilizing conformations that are not intrinsically favored. Data also link the presence of off-rotamers in His and Trp to favorable interactions with the backbone. Results also suggest that the intrinsic energetics of the side-chains of Phe and Tyr may play important roles in protein folding and stability. Analyses on whether intrinsic side-chain energetics can influence backbone preference identified a strong correlation for residues in the alphaL backbone conformation. It is suggested that this correlation reflects the intrinsic instability of the alphaL backbone such that assumption of this backbone conformation is facilitated by intrinsically favorable side-chain conformations. Together our results offer a broad overview of the conformational properties of amino acid side-chains and the QM data may be used as target data for force field optimization.
Amino acid side-chain conformational properties influence the overall structural and dynamic properties of proteins and, therefore, their biological functions. In this study, quantum mechanical (QM) potential energy surfaces for the rotation of side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) torsions inn class="Chemical">dipeptides in the alphaR, beta, and alphaL backbone conformations were calculated. The QM energy surfaces provide a broad view of the intrinsic conformational properties of each amino acid side-chain. The extent to which intrinsic energetics dictates side-chain orientation was studied through comparisons of the QM energy surfaces with χ(1) and χ(2) free energy surfaces from probability distributions obtained from a survey of high resolution crystal structures. In general, the survey probability maxima are centered in minima of the QM surfaces as expected for sp(3) (or sp(2) for χ(2) of Asn, Phe, Trp, and Tyr) atom centers with strong variations between amino acids occurring in the energies of the minima indicating intrinsic differences in rotamer preferences. High correlations between the QM and survey data were found for hydrophobic side-chains except Met, suggesting minimal influence of the protein and solution environments on their conformational distributions. Conversely, low correlations for polar or charged side-chains indicate a dominant role of the environment in stabilizing conformations that are not intrinsically favored. Data also link the presence of off-rotamers in His and Trp to favorable interactions with the backbone. Results also suggest that the intrinsic energetics of the side-chains of Phe and Tyr may play important roles in protein folding and stability. Analyses on whether intrinsic side-chain energetics can influence backbone preference identified a strong correlation for residues in the alphaL backbone conformation. It is suggested that this correlation reflects the intrinsic instability of the alphaL backbone such that assumption of this backbone conformation is facilitated by intrinsically favorable side-chain conformations. Together our results offer a broad overview of the conformational properties of amino acid side-chains and the QM data may be used as target data for force field optimization.
Authors: H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Yihan Shao; Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Yousung Jung; Jörg Kussmann; Christian Ochsenfeld; Shawn T Brown; Andrew T B Gilbert; Lyudmila V Slipchenko; Sergey V Levchenko; Darragh P O'Neill; Robert A DiStasio; Rohini C Lochan; Tao Wang; Gregory J O Beran; Nicholas A Besley; John M Herbert; Ching Yeh Lin; Troy Van Voorhis; Siu Hung Chien; Alex Sodt; Ryan P Steele; Vitaly A Rassolov; Paul E Maslen; Prakashan P Korambath; Ross D Adamson; Brian Austin; Jon Baker; Edward F C Byrd; Holger Dachsel; Robert J Doerksen; Andreas Dreuw; Barry D Dunietz; Anthony D Dutoi; Thomas R Furlani; Steven R Gwaltney; Andreas Heyden; So Hirata; Chao-Ping Hsu; Gary Kedziora; Rustam Z Khalliulin; Phil Klunzinger; Aaron M Lee; Michael S Lee; Wanzhen Liang; Itay Lotan; Nikhil Nair; Baron Peters; Emil I Proynov; Piotr A Pieniazek; Young Min Rhee; Jim Ritchie; Edina Rosta; C David Sherrill; Andrew C Simmonett; Joseph E Subotnik; H Lee Woodcock; Weimin Zhang; Alexis T Bell; Arup K Chakraborty; Daniel M Chipman; Frerich J Keil; Arieh Warshel; Warren J Hehre; Henry F Schaefer; Jing Kong; Anna I Krylov; Peter M W Gill; Martin Head-Gordon Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2006-06-12 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Franc Avbelj; Simona Golic Grdadolnik; Joze Grdadolnik; Robert L Baldwin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pedro E M Lopes; Jing Huang; Jihyun Shim; Yun Luo; Hui Li; Benoît Roux; Alexander D Mackerell Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: Lynne Regan; Diego Caballero; Michael R Hinrichsen; Alejandro Virrueta; Danielle M Williams; Corey S O'Hern Journal: Biopolymers Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.505