Literature DB >> 22582816

Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma.

James E Mazur1, Patricia E Kahlbaugh.   

Abstract

In the Monty Hall dilemma, an individual chooses between three options, only one of which will deliver a prize. After the initial choice, one of the nonchosen options is revealed as a losing option, and the individual can choose to stay with the original choice or switch to the other remaining option. Previous studies have found that most adults stay with their initial choice, although the chances of winning are 2/3 for switching and 1/3 for staying. Pigeons, college students, and preschool children were given many trials on this task to examine how their choices might change with experience. The college students began to switch on a majority of trials much sooner than the pigeons, contrary to the findings by Herbranson and Schroeder (2010) that pigeons perform better than people on this task. In all three groups, some individuals approximated the optimal strategy of switching on every trial, but most did not. Many of the preschoolers immediately showed a pattern of always switching or always staying and continued this pattern throughout the experiment. In a condition where the probability of winning was 90% after a switch, all college students and all but one pigeon learned to switch on nearly every trial. The results suggest that one main impediment to learning the optimal strategy in the Monty Hall task, even after repeated trials, is the difficulty in discriminating the different reinforcement probabilities for switching versus staying.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22582816      PMCID: PMC3435463          DOI: 10.1037/a0028273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  21 in total

1.  Probability-matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-12

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Some comparative psychology.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN; J WODINSKY; D K CANDLAND
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-03

4.  Delay discounting: I'm a k, you're a k.

Authors:  Amy L Odum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  When less is not always more: stereotype knowledge and reasoning development.

Authors:  Wim De Neys; Karolien Vanderputte
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-03

6.  Human choice in "counterintuitive" situations: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  B A Wanchisen; T A Tatham; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching in an undisturbed natural human environment.

Authors:  J J McDowell; Marcia L Caron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice in quail neonates: the origins of generalized matching.

Authors:  Susan M Schneider; Robert Lickliter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard.

Authors:  Bruce D Burns; Mareike Wieth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

10.  The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser.

Authors:  Stefan Krauss; X T Wang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  The Monty Hall dilemma in pigeons: effect of investment in initial choice.

Authors:  Jessica P Stagner; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.

Authors:  Elisabet Tubau; David Aguilar-Lleyda; Eric D Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 3.  Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lore Saenen; Mieke Heyvaert; Wim Van Dooren; Walter Schaeken; Patrick Onghena
Journal:  Psychol Belg       Date:  2018-06-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.