Literature DB >> 12656295

The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser.

Stefan Krauss1, X T Wang.   

Abstract

The Monty Hall problem (or three-door problem) is a famous example of a "cognitive illusion," often used to demonstrate people's resistance and deficiency in dealing with uncertainty. The authors formulated the problem using manipulations in 4 cognitive aspects, namely, natural frequencies, mental models, perspective change, and the less-is-more effect. These manipulations combined led to a significant increase in the proportion of correct answers given by novice participants, largely because of the synergy of frequency-based formulation and perspective change (Experiments 1, 2). In a raining study (Experiment 3) frequency formulation and mental models, but not Bayes's rule training, showed significant positive transfer in solving related problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12656295     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  14 in total

1.  Useful probability considerations in genetics: the goat problem with tigers and other applications of Bayes' theorem.

Authors:  Konrad Oexle
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Perspectives on the 2 × 2 Matrix: Solving Semantically Distinct Problems Based on a Shared Structure of Binary Contingencies.

Authors:  Hansjörg Neth; Nico Gradwohl; Dirk Streeb; Daniel A Keim; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-09

3.  Learning how to "make a deal": human (Homo sapiens) and monkey (Macaca mulatta) performance when repeatedly faced with the Monty Hall Dilemma.

Authors:  Emily D Klein; Theodore A Evans; Natasha B Schultz; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma.

Authors:  James E Mazur; Patricia E Kahlbaugh
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 5.  Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.

Authors:  Elisabet Tubau; David Aguilar-Lleyda; Eric D Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-31

6.  The psychology of Bayesian reasoning.

Authors:  David R Mandel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-09

7.  The equiprobability bias from a mathematical and psychological perspective.

Authors:  Nicolas Gauvrit; Kinga Morsanyi
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-12-31

8.  The Monty Hall problem revisited: Autonomic arousal in an inverted version of the game.

Authors:  Eduardo Massad; Paulo Cesar Costa Dos Santos; Armando Freitas da Rocha; Edward J N Stupple
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pitfalls of counterfactual thinking in medical practice: preventing errors by using more functional reference points.

Authors:  John V Petrocelli
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Why contextual preference reversals maximize expected value.

Authors:  Andrew Howes; Paul A Warren; George Farmer; Wael El-Deredy; Richard L Lewis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.