OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a web-based personally controlled health management system (PCHMS) on the uptake of seasonal influenza vaccine and primary care service utilization among university students and staff. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PCHMS called Healthy.me was developed and evaluated in a 2010 CONSORT-compliant two-group (6-month waitlist vs PCHMS) parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) (allocation ratio 1:1). The PCHMS integrated an untethered personal health record with consumer care pathways, social forums, and messaging links with a health service provider. RESULTS:742 university students and staff met inclusion criteria and were randomized to a 6-month waitlist (n=372) or the PCHMS (n=370). Amongst the 470 participants eligible for primary analysis, PCHMS users were 6.7% (95% CI: 1.46 to 12.30) more likely than the waitlist to receive an influenza vaccine (waitlist: 4.9% (12/246, 95% CI 2.8 to 8.3) vs PCHMS: 11.6% (26/224, 95% CI 8.0 to 16.5); χ(2)=7.1, p=0.008). PCHMS participants were also 11.6% (95% CI 3.6 to 19.5) more likely to visit the health service provider (waitlist: 17.9% (44/246, 95% CI 13.6 to 23.2) vs PCHMS: 29.5% (66/224, 95% CI: 23.9 to 35.7); χ(2)=8.8, p=0.003). A dose-response effect was detected, where greater use of the PCHMS was associated with higher rates of vaccination (p=0.001) and health service provider visits (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: PCHMS can significantly increase consumer participation in preventive health activities, such as influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating a PCHMS into routine health service delivery systems appears to be an effective mechanism for enhancing consumer engagement in preventive health measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000386033. http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?id=335463.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a web-based personally controlled health management system (PCHMS) on the uptake of seasonal influenza vaccine and primary care service utilization among university students and staff. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PCHMS called Healthy.me was developed and evaluated in a 2010 CONSORT-compliant two-group (6-month waitlist vs PCHMS) parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) (allocation ratio 1:1). The PCHMS integrated an untethered personal health record with consumer care pathways, social forums, and messaging links with a health service provider. RESULTS: 742 university students and staff met inclusion criteria and were randomized to a 6-month waitlist (n=372) or the PCHMS (n=370). Amongst the 470 participants eligible for primary analysis, PCHMS users were 6.7% (95% CI: 1.46 to 12.30) more likely than the waitlist to receive an influenza vaccine (waitlist: 4.9% (12/246, 95% CI 2.8 to 8.3) vs PCHMS: 11.6% (26/224, 95% CI 8.0 to 16.5); χ(2)=7.1, p=0.008). PCHMS participants were also 11.6% (95% CI 3.6 to 19.5) more likely to visit the health service provider (waitlist: 17.9% (44/246, 95% CI 13.6 to 23.2) vs PCHMS: 29.5% (66/224, 95% CI: 23.9 to 35.7); χ(2)=8.8, p=0.003). A dose-response effect was detected, where greater use of the PCHMS was associated with higher rates of vaccination (p=0.001) and health service provider visits (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: PCHMS can significantly increase consumer participation in preventive health activities, such as influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating a PCHMS into routine health service delivery systems appears to be an effective mechanism for enhancing consumer engagement in preventive health measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000386033. http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?id=335463.
Authors: Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-05-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Richard Kent Zimmerman; Mahlon Raymund; Janine E Janosky; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Michael J Fine Journal: Vaccine Date: 2003-03-28 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Zarnie Khadjesari; Elizabeth Murray; Eleftheria Kalaitzaki; Ian R White; Jim McCambridge; Simon G Thompson; Paul Wallace; Christine Godfrey Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: John N Mafi; Roanne Mejilla; Henry Feldman; Long Ngo; Tom Delbanco; Jonathan Darer; Christina Wee; Jan Walker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Kumanan Wilson; Katherine M Atkinson; Shelley L Deeks; Natasha S Crowcroft Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sarah L Cutrona; Jessica G Golden; Sarah L Goff; Jessica Ogarek; Bruce Barton; Lloyd Fisher; Peggy Preusse; Devi Sundaresan; Lawrence Garber; Kathleen M Mazor Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 5.128