Literature DB >> 26078414

Improving vaccine registries through mobile technologies: a vision for mobile enhanced Immunization information systems.

Kumanan Wilson1, Katherine M Atkinson2, Shelley L Deeks3, Natasha S Crowcroft4.   

Abstract

Immunization registries or information systems are critical to improving the quality and evaluating the ongoing success of immunization programs. However, the completeness of these systems is challenged by a myriad of factors including the fragmentation of vaccine administration, increasing mobility of individuals, new vaccine development, use of multiple products, and increasingly frequent changes in recommendations. Mobile technologies could offer a solution, which mitigates some of these challenges. Engaging individuals to have more control of their own immunization information using their mobile devices could improve the timeliness and accuracy of data in central immunization information systems. Other opportunities presented by mobile technologies that could be exploited to improve immunization information systems include mobile reporting of adverse events following immunization, the capacity to scan 2D barcodes, and enabling bidirectional communication between individuals and public health officials. Challenges to utilizing mobile solutions include ensuring privacy of data, access, and equity concerns, obtaining consent and ensuring adoption of technology at sufficiently high rates. By empowering individuals with their own health information, mobile technologies can also serve as a mechanism to transfer immunization information as individuals cross local, regional, and national borders. Ultimately, mobile enhanced immunization information systems can help realize the goal of the individual, the healthcare provider, and public health officials always having access to the same immunization information.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  epidemiology; mobile technology; public health policy; surveillance; vaccines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26078414      PMCID: PMC7814932          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  20 in total

1.  Parents' experiences with and preferences for immunization reminder/recall technologies.

Authors:  Sarah J Clark; Amy Butchart; Allison Kennedy; Kevin J Dombkowski
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Impact of a web-based personally controlled health management system on influenza vaccination and health services utilization rates: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annie Y S Lau; Vitali Sintchenko; Jacinta Crimmins; Farah Magrabi; Blanca Gallego; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Præventis, the immunisation register of the Netherlands: a tool to evaluate the National Immunisation Programme.

Authors:  A van Lier; P Oomen; P de Hoogh; I Drijfhout; B Elsinghorst; J Kemmeren; M Conyn-van Spaendonck; H de Melker
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2012-04-26

4.  Australian immunisation registers: established foundations and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  L K Chin; N W Crawford; G Rowles; J P Buttery
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2012-04-19

5.  Using SMS technology to verify the safety of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine for pregnant women in real time.

Authors:  Annette K Regan; Christopher C Blyth; Paul V Effler
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Utilizing health information technology to improve vaccine communication and coverage.

Authors:  Melissa S Stockwell; Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Vaccinations administered during off-clinic hours at a national community pharmacy: implications for increasing patient access and convenience.

Authors:  Jeffery A Goad; Michael S Taitel; Leonard E Fensterheim; Adam E Cannon
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Investigating an outbreak of Clostridium perfringens gastroenteritis in a school using smartphone technology, London, March 2013.

Authors:  B Simone; C Atchison; B Ruiz; P Greenop; J Dave; D Ready; H Maguire; B Walsh; S Anderson
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-05-15

9.  Using automated text messages to monitor adverse events following immunisation in general practice.

Authors:  Alan Leeb; Annette K Regan; Ian J Peters; Candice Leeb; Gregory Leeb; Paul V Effler
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Descriptive epidemiology of adverse events after immunization: reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1991-1994.

Authors:  M M Braun; S S Ellenberg
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  14 in total

1.  An evaluation of the feasibility and usability of a proof of concept mobile app for adverse event reporting post influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Kumanan Wilson; Katherine M Atkinson; Jacqueline Westeinde; Cameron Bell; Kim Marty; Dean Fergusson; Shelley L Deeks; Natasha Crowcroft; Julie A Bettinger
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Immunization information systems in Canada: Attributes, functionality, strengths and challenges. A Canadian Immunization Research Network study.

Authors:  Sarah E Wilson; Susan Quach; Shannon E MacDonald; Monika Naus; Shelley L Deeks; Natasha S Crowcroft; Salaheddin M Mahmud; Dat Tran; Jeffrey C Kwong; Karen Tu; Caitlin Johnson; Shalini Desai
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  Modernizing Immunization Practice Through the Use of Cloud Based Platforms.

Authors:  Cameron Bell; Katherine M Atkinson; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Barriers and facilitators to the use of an immunization application: a qualitative study supplemented with Google Analytics data.

Authors:  Kathleen Burgess; Katherine M Atkinson; Jacqueline Westeinde; Natasha Crowcroft; Shelley L Deeks; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.341

5.  Can mobile technologies improve on-time vaccination? A study piloting maternal use of ImmunizeCA, a Pan-Canadian immunization app.

Authors:  Katherine M Atkinson; Jacqueline Westeinde; Robin Ducharme; Sarah E Wilson; Shelley L Deeks; Natasha Crowcroft; Steven Hawken; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Barriers to Pretransplant Immunization: A Qualitative Interview Study of Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Stakeholders.

Authors:  Amy G Feldman; Rebekah Marsh; Allison Kempe; Megan A Morris
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Can Bar Code Scanning Improve Data Capture in a National Register? Findings from the Irish National Orthopaedic Register.

Authors:  Shane P Russell; James M Broderick; Sean D O'Dea; Eoin Fahey; Paddy Kenny; James Cashman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Apps for immunization: Leveraging mobile devices to place the individual at the center of care.

Authors:  Kumanan Wilson; Katherine M Atkinson; Jacqueline Westeinde
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Childhood immunisation in South Asia - overcoming the hurdles to progress.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman; Douglas J Noble
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2016-09

10.  Feasibility and Limitations of Vaccine Two-Dimensional Barcoding Using Mobile Devices.

Authors:  Cameron Bell; Julien Guerinet; Katherine M Atkinson; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.