Literature DB >> 25483518

Effectiveness of interventions that apply new media to improve vaccine uptake and vaccine coverage.

Anna Odone1, Antonio Ferrari, Francesca Spagnoli, Sara Visciarelli, Abigail Shefer, Cesira Pasquarella, Carlo Signorelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) are still a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In high and middle-income settings, immunization coverage is relatively high. However, in many countries coverage rates of routinely recommended vaccines are still below the targets established by international and national advisory committees. Progress in the field of communication technology might provide useful tools to enhance immunization strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically collect and summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that apply new media to promote vaccination uptake and increase vaccination coverage.
DESIGN: We conducted a systematic literature review. Studies published from January 1999 to September 2013 were identified by searching electronic resources (Pubmed, Embase), manual searches of references and expert consultation. Study setting We focused on interventions that targeted recommended vaccinations for children, adolescents and adults and: (1) aimed at increasing community demand for immunizations, or (2) were provider-based interventions. We limited the study setting to countries that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a measure of vaccination (vaccine uptake or vaccine coverage). Considered secondary outcomes included willingness to receive immunization, attitudes and perceptions toward vaccination, and perceived helpfulness of the intervention.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review. The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (74%, n = 14); 68% (n = 13) of the studies were experimental, the rest having an observational study design. Eleven (58%) reported results on the primary outcome. Retrieved studies explored the role of: text messaging (n.7, 37%), smartphone applications (n.1, 5%), Youtube videos (n.1, 5%), Facebook (n.1, 5%), targeted websites and portals (n.4, 21%), software for physicians and health professionals (n.4, 21%), and email communication (n.1, 5%). There is some evidence that text messaging, accessing immunization campaign websites, using patient-held web-based portals and computerized reminders increase immunization coverage rates. Insufficient evidence is available on the use of social networks, email communication and smartphone applications.
CONCLUSION: Although there is great potential for improving vaccine uptake and vaccine coverage by implementing programs and interventions that apply new media, scant data are available and further rigorous research - including cost-effectiveness assessments - is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication technology; immunization; interventions; new media; social media; systematic review; vaccine coverage; vaccine preventable diseases; vaccine uptake

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25483518      PMCID: PMC4514191          DOI: 10.4161/hv.34313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  31 in total

Review 1.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors:  P A Briss; L E Rodewald; A R Hinman; A M Shefer; R A Strikas; R R Bernier; V G Carande-Kulis; H R Yusuf; S M Ndiaye; S M Williams
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Using electronic mail to improve MMR uptake amongst third level students.

Authors:  F Cooney; A Ryan; N Schinaia; A Breslin
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2010-03

Review 3.  Inclusion of underserved racial and ethnic groups in cancer intervention research using new media: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Rachel C Shelton; Jamie Mitchell; Tara Eaton; Pamela Valera; Anne Katz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013-12

4.  Improving the rates of inpatient pneumococcal vaccination: impact of standing orders versus computerized reminders to physicians.

Authors:  Christina M Coyle; Brian P Currie
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  A computerized pneumococcal vaccination reminder system in the adult emergency department.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; Fei Ye; Yu Shyr; Ian Jones; William M Gregg; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Text message reminders to promote human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  Elyse Olshen Kharbanda; Melissa S Stockwell; Harrison W Fox; Raquel Andres; Marcos Lara; Vaughn I Rickert
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

Review 8.  The effects of Internet or interactive computer-based patient education in the field of breast cancer: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Anne M Ryhänen; Mervi Siekkinen; Sirkku Rankinen; Heikki Korvenranta; Helena Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-09-09

9.  Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul R Dexter; Susan M Perkins; Kati S Maharry; Kathy Jones; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Vaccine criticism on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  Richard K Zimmerman; Robert M Wolfe; Dwight E Fox; Jake R Fox; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Judith A Troy; Lisa K Sharp
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  54 in total

1.  Media and Technology Use Among Hispanics/Latinos in New York: Implications for Health Communication Programs.

Authors:  Jennifer A Manganello; Gena Gerstner; Kristen Pergolino; Yvonne Graham; David Strogatz
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-10-20

2.  Addressing personal parental values in decisions about childhood vaccination: Measure development.

Authors:  Jessica R Cataldi; Carter Sevick; Jennifer Pyrzanowski; Nicole Wagner; Sarah E Brewer; Komal J Narwaney; Jo Ann Shoup; Ken Resnicow; Jason Glanz; Amanda Dempsey; Bethany M Kwan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Direct-to-adolescent text messaging for vaccine reminders: What will parents permit?

Authors:  James R Roberts; Kristen Morella; Erin H Dawley; Christi A Madden; Robert M Jacobson; Charlene Pope; Boyd Davis; David Thompson; Elizabeth S O'Brien; Paul M Darden
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  The future of immunization policies in Italy and in the European Union: The Declaration of Erice.

Authors:  Anna Odone; Gaetano M Fara; Giuseppe Giammaco; Francesco Blangiardi; Carlo Signorelli
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.

Authors:  Valantine Ngum Ndze; Anelisa Jaca; Charles Shey Wiysonge
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A systematic literature review to examine the potential for social media to impact HPV vaccine uptake and awareness, knowledge, and attitudes about HPV and HPV vaccination.

Authors:  Rebecca R Ortiz; Andrea Smith; Tamera Coyne-Beasley
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Immunization and media coverage in Italy: an eleven-year analysis (2007-17).

Authors:  A Odone; V Tramutola; M Morgado; C Signorelli
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Can mobile technologies improve on-time vaccination? A study piloting maternal use of ImmunizeCA, a Pan-Canadian immunization app.

Authors:  Katherine M Atkinson; Jacqueline Westeinde; Robin Ducharme; Sarah E Wilson; Shelley L Deeks; Natasha Crowcroft; Steven Hawken; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases.

Authors:  Neha Puri; Eric A Coomes; Hourmazd Haghbayan; Keith Gunaratne
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Systematic review of the incremental costs of interventions that increase immunization coverage.

Authors:  Sachiko Ozawa; Tatenda T Yemeke; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.