Literature DB >> 31161268

Translational Quantitative Systems Pharmacology in Drug Development: from Current Landscape to Good Practices.

Jane P F Bai1, Justin C Earp2, Venkateswaran C Pillai2.   

Abstract

Systems pharmacology approaches have the capability of quantitatively linking the key biological molecules relevant to a drug candidate's mechanism of action (drug-induced signaling pathways) to the clinical biomarkers associated with the proposed target disease, thereby quantitatively facilitating its development and life cycle management. In this review, the model attributes of published quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling for lowering cholesterol, treating salt-sensitive hypertension, and treating rare diseases as well as describing bone homeostasis and related pharmacological effects are critically reviewed with respect to model quality, calibration, validation, and performance. We further reviewed the common practices in optimizing QSP modeling and prediction. Notably, leveraging genetics and genomic studies for model calibration and validation is common. Statistical and quantitative assessment of QSP prediction and handling of model uncertainty are, however, mostly lacking as are the quantitative and statistical criteria for assessing QSP predictions and the covariance matrix of coefficients between the parameters in a validated virtual population. To accelerate advances and application of QSP with consistent quality, a list of key questions is proposed to be addressed when assessing the quality of a QSP model in hopes of stimulating the scientific community to set common expectations. The common expectations as to what constitutes the best QSP modeling practices, which the scientific community supports, will advance QSP modeling in the realm of informed drug development. In the long run, good practices will extend the life cycles of QSP models beyond the life cycles of individual drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  best practices; biomarkers; life cycle of QSP models; model assessment; virtual patients

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31161268     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0339-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  53 in total

1.  Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling.

Authors:  Vincent Lemaire; Frank L Tobin; Larry D Greller; Carolyn R Cho; Larry J Suva
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Application of a mechanism-based disease systems model for osteoporosis to clinical data.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Stephan Schmidt; Lambertus A Peletier; Rik de Greef; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  A model-based approach to investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms of hypertension and response to antihypertensive therapies: extending the Guyton model.

Authors:  K Melissa Hallow; Arthur Lo; Jeni Beh; Manoj Rodrigo; Sergey Ermakov; Stuart Friedman; Hector de Leon; Anamika Sarkar; Yuan Xiong; Ramesh Sarangapani; Henning Schmidt; Randy Webb; Anna Georgieva Kondic
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Molecular characterization of loss-of-function mutations in PCSK9 and identification of a compound heterozygote.

Authors:  Zhenze Zhao; Yetsa Tuakli-Wosornu; Thomas A Lagace; Lisa Kinch; Nicholas V Grishin; Jay D Horton; Jonathan C Cohen; Helen H Hobbs
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Atorvastatin increases human serum levels of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

Authors:  Holly E Careskey; R Aleks Davis; William E Alborn; Jason S Troutt; Guoqing Cao; Robert J Konrad
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.922

6.  Proteasomal degradation of Runx2 shortens parathyroid hormone-induced anti-apoptotic signaling in osteoblasts. A putative explanation for why intermittent administration is needed for bone anabolism.

Authors:  Teresita Bellido; A Afshan Ali; Lilian I Plotkin; Qiang Fu; Igor Gubrij; Paula K Roberson; Robert S Weinstein; Charles A O'Brien; Stavros C Manolagas; Robert L Jilka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling of Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency and the Enzyme Replacement Therapy Olipudase Alfa Is an Innovative Tool for Linking Pathophysiology and Pharmacology.

Authors:  Chanchala D Kaddi; Bradley Niesner; Rena Baek; Paul Jasper; John Pappas; John Tolsma; Jing Li; Zachary van Rijn; Mengdi Tao; Catherine Ortemann-Renon; Rachael Easton; Sharon Tan; Ana Cristina Puga; Edward H Schuchman; Jeffrey S Barrett; Karim Azer
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-19

8.  An in-silico model of lipoprotein metabolism and kinetics for the evaluation of targets and biomarkers in the reverse cholesterol transport pathway.

Authors:  James Lu; Katrin Hübner; M Nazeem Nanjee; Eliot A Brinton; Norman A Mazer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A General Network Pharmacodynamic Model-Based Design Pipeline for Customized Cancer Therapy Applied to the VEGFR Pathway.

Authors:  X-Y Zhang; M R Birtwistle; J M Gallo
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-15

10.  Sobol Sensitivity Analysis: A Tool to Guide the Development and Evaluation of Systems Pharmacology Models.

Authors:  X-Y Zhang; M N Trame; L J Lesko; S Schmidt
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02
View more
  19 in total

1.  Reduction of quantitative systems pharmacology models using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Abdallah Derbalah; Hesham S Al-Sallami; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Systems biology of angiogenesis signaling: Computational models and omics.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Hanwen Wang; Rebeca Hannah M Oliveira; Chen Zhao; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  WIREs Mech Dis       Date:  2021-12-30

3.  QSP-IO: A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Toolbox for Mechanistic Multiscale Modeling for Immuno-Oncology Applications.

Authors:  Richard J Sové; Mohammad Jafarnejad; Chen Zhao; Hanwen Wang; Huilin Ma; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-07

4.  Immunoactivating the tumor microenvironment enhances immunotherapy as predicted by integrative computational model.

Authors:  Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The Systems Biology of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters: Relevance to Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.

Authors:  Sanjay K Nigam; Kevin T Bush; Vibha Bhatnagar; Samuel M Poloyac; Jeremiah D Momper
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Combination therapy with T cell engager and PD-L1 blockade enhances the antitumor potency of T cells as predicted by a QSP model.

Authors:  Huilin Ma; Hanwen Wang; Richard J Sové; Jun Wang; Craig Giragossian; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 13.751

7.  A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model of T Cell Engager Applied to Solid Tumor.

Authors:  Huilin Ma; Hanwen Wang; Richard J Sove; Mohammad Jafarnejad; Chia-Hung Tsai; Jun Wang; Craig Giragossian; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Conducting a Virtual Clinical Trial in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Using a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model With an Epigenetic Modulator and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Hanwen Wang; Richard J Sové; Mohammad Jafarnejad; Sondra Rahmeh; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Vered Stearns; Evanthia T Roussos Torres; Roisin M Connolly; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-25

9.  Consideration of a Credibility Assessment Framework in Model-Informed Drug Development: Potential Application to Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation.

Authors:  Colleen Kuemmel; Yuching Yang; Xinyuan Zhang; Jeffry Florian; Hao Zhu; Million Tegenge; Shiew-Mei Huang; Yaning Wang; Tina Morrison; Issam Zineh
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-10

10.  Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Haoyang Mi; Chang Gong; Jeremias Sulam; Elana J Fertig; Alexander S Szalay; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Vered Stearns; Leisha A Emens; Ashley M Cimino-Mathews; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.