Literature DB >> 22579047

Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Evanguelos Xylinas1, Michael Rink, Eugene K Cha, Thomas Clozel, Richard K Lee, Harun Fajkovic, Evi Comploj, Giacomo Novara, Vitaly Margulis, Jay D Raman, Yair Lotan, Wassim Kassouf, Hans-Martin Fritsche, Alon Weizer, Juan I Martinez-Salamanca, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Richard Zigeuner, Armin Pycha, Douglas S Scherr, Christian Seitz, Thomas Walton, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Surena Matin, Francesco Montorsi, Marc Zerbib, Shahrokh F Shariat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach to the bladder cuff during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
OBJECTIVES: To compare the oncologic outcomes following RNU using three different methods of bladder cuff management. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of 2681 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at 24 international institutions from 1987 to 2007. INTERVENTION: Three methods of bladder cuff excision were performed: transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of distal ureter management on intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 2681 patients, 1811 (67.5%) underwent the transvesical approach; 785 (29.3%), the extravesical approach; and 85 (3.2%), the endoscopic approach. There was no difference in terms of RFS, CSS, and OS among the three distal ureteral management approaches. Patients who underwent the endoscopic approach were at significantly higher risk of intravesical recurrence compared with those who underwent the transvesical (p=0.02) or extravesical approaches (p=0.02); the latter two groups did not differ from each other (p=0.40). Actuarial intravesical RFS estimates at 2 and 5 yr after RNU were 69% and 58%, 69% and 51%, and 61% and 42% for the transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic approaches, respectively. In multivariate analyses, distal ureteral management (p=0.01), surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic; p=0.02), previous bladder cancer (p<0.001), higher tumor stage (trend; p=0.01), concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) (p<0.001), and lymph node involvement (trend; p<0.001) were all associated with intravesical recurrence. Excluding patients with history of previous bladder cancer, all variables remained independent predictors of intravesical recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic approach was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates. Interestingly, concomitant CIS in the upper tract is a strong predictor of intravesical recurrence after RNU. The association of laparoscopic RNU with intravesical recurrence needs to be further investigated.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal ureter management; Radical nephroureterectomy; Recurrence; Upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22579047     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  56 in total

Review 1.  Optimal Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: an Unmet Need.

Authors:  Mounsif Azizi; Salim K Cheriyan; Charles C Peyton; Beat Foerster; Shahrokh F Shariat; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01

2.  Canadian guidelines for postoperative surveillance of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher B Allard; Peter Black; Wassim Kassouf; Christopher Morash; Ricardo Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Predictive tools for clinical decision-making and counseling of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Sibani Mangal; Morgan Roupret; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinomas: predictors and impact on subsequent oncological outcomes from a national multicenter study.

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; Pierre Colin; François Audenet; Véronique Phe; Luc Cormier; Olivier Cussenot; Alain Houlgatte; Gilles Karsenty; Franck Bruyère; Thomas Polguer; Alain Ruffion; Antoine Valeri; François Rozet; Jean-Alexandre Long; Marc Zerbib; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift towards nephron sparing management.

Authors:  Julia V Fiuk; Brad F Schwartz
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

Review 7.  Results and outcomes after endoscopic treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma: the Austrian experience.

Authors:  Harun Fajkovic; Tobias Klatte; Udo Nagele; Michael Dunzinger; Richard Zigeuner; Wilhelm Hübner; Mesut Remzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Oncologic outcomes obtained after laparoscopic, robotic and/or single port nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract tumours.

Authors:  Maria J Ribal; J Huguet; A Alcaraz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  The method of bladder cuff excision during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy does not affect oncologic outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher B Allard; Abdulaziz Alamri; Shawn Dason; Farough Farrokhyar; Edward D Matsumoto; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a matched-pair comparison based on perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Wentao Liu; Yinhuai Wang; Zhaohui Zhong; Hongyi Jiang; Shifeng Ouyang; Liang Zhu; Ran Xu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.