INTRODUCTION: Through evolution in technology, endoscopic treatment has gained popularity for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (ENDO-UTUC). METHODS: A total of 20 patients with ENDO-UTUC were compared to 178 treated by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for a pTa-1 UTUC, and a systematic review was performed. RESULTS: Mean age for ENDO-UTUC was 71.9 ± 16.0 years, and tumor features were favorable (90 % papillary, 14 low grade, 11 pTa). All ENDO-UTUC were performed ureteroscopically. Mean follow-up was 20.4 ± 30 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 45 %. Local (LR) and bladder recurrence (BR) was 25 and 15 %. Time to definitive treatment was longer, ASA higher, LR rates higher, OS lower for ENDO-UTUC (all p < 0.001), but no difference was recorded for BR (p = 0.056) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.364). Postoperative kidney function (KF) was better in the ENDO-UTUC (p = 0.048), though preoperative KF showed no difference. The maximal level of evidence was 3b, patients were highly selected, numbers of patients were low, and ASA scores high. OS was rather low and CSS high. LR rate was high (61 %) and BR rate moderate (39 %) for ureteroscopic and 36 and 28 %, respectively, for percutaneous approach. CONCLUSIONS: LR for ENDO-UTUC is high. In high-grade UTUC, oncological outcome is worse. RNU is associated with a significant loss of KF, but LR is rare. ENDO-UTUC is reserved for selected cases if elective. In imperative cases, it has to be balanced between KF, morbidity of the procedure, risk of operation and tumor control. ENDO-UTUC is not necessarily underused in Austria, because of lack in evidence, but 41 % of all RNU were performed in pTa/pTis/pT1 lesions.
INTRODUCTION: Through evolution in technology, endoscopic treatment has gained popularity for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (ENDO-UTUC). METHODS: A total of 20 patients with ENDO-UTUC were compared to 178 treated by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for a pTa-1 UTUC, and a systematic review was performed. RESULTS: Mean age for ENDO-UTUC was 71.9 ± 16.0 years, and tumor features were favorable (90 % papillary, 14 low grade, 11 pTa). All ENDO-UTUC were performed ureteroscopically. Mean follow-up was 20.4 ± 30 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 45 %. Local (LR) and bladder recurrence (BR) was 25 and 15 %. Time to definitive treatment was longer, ASA higher, LR rates higher, OS lower for ENDO-UTUC (all p < 0.001), but no difference was recorded for BR (p = 0.056) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.364). Postoperative kidney function (KF) was better in the ENDO-UTUC (p = 0.048), though preoperative KF showed no difference. The maximal level of evidence was 3b, patients were highly selected, numbers of patients were low, and ASA scores high. OS was rather low and CSS high. LR rate was high (61 %) and BR rate moderate (39 %) for ureteroscopic and 36 and 28 %, respectively, for percutaneous approach. CONCLUSIONS: LR for ENDO-UTUC is high. In high-grade UTUC, oncological outcome is worse. RNU is associated with a significant loss of KF, but LR is rare. ENDO-UTUC is reserved for selected cases if elective. In imperative cases, it has to be balanced between KF, morbidity of the procedure, risk of operation and tumor control. ENDO-UTUC is not necessarily underused in Austria, because of lack in evidence, but 41 % of all RNU were performed in pTa/pTis/pT1 lesions.
Authors: Matthew G Kaag; Rebecca L O'Malley; Padraic O'Malley; Guilherme Godoy; Mang Chen; Marc C Smaldone; Ronald L Hrebinko; Jay D Raman; Bernard Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Michael D Stifelman; Samir S Taneja; William C Huang Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Amy E Krambeck; R Houston Thompson; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura; Horst Zincke; Daniel S Elliott; Michael L Blute Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Eliza M Raymundo; Michael E Lipkin; Lionel B Bañez; John G Mancini; Dorit E Zilberman; Glenn M Preminger; Brant A Inman Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Mesut Remzi; Andrea Haitel; Vitaly Margulis; Pierre Karakiewicz; Pierre Karakiewizc; Francesco Montorsi; Eiji Kikuchi; Richard Zigeuner; Alon Weizer; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Nazareno Suardi; Jay D Raman; Yair Lotan; Matthias Waldert; Casey K Ng; Mario Fernández; Theresa M Koppie; Philipp Ströbel; Wareef Kabbani; Masaru Murai; Cord Langner; Marco Roscigno; Jeffrey Wheat; Charles C Guo; Christopher G Wood; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: BJU Int Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Stephan M Korn; Nicolai A Hübner; Christian Seitz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Harun Fajkovic Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Rao S Mandalapu; Mesut Remzi; Theo M de Reijke; Vitaly Margulis; J Palou; A Kapoor; Ofer Yossepowitch; Jonathan Coleman; Olivier Traxer; J Kyle Anderson; James Catto; Jean de la Rosette; Timothy O'Brien; Anthony Zlotta; Surena F Matin Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 4.226