BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence of an association between disinfection by-products (DBPs) exposure via drinking water and reproductive outcomes is still inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between trihalomethanes (THMs), chlorite and chlorate exposure and congenital anomalies. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out in Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). Data on 1917 different congenital anomalies (neural tube, cardiac, diaphragm and abdominal wall, oesophagus, cleft lip and palate, respiratory, urinary tract and chromosomal anomalies) observed in the period 2002-2005 were extracted from the Regional Malformation Registry. Four controls (newborns without anomalies) were randomly selected form the Regional Birth Register and frequency matched to cases according to pregnancy period. The network supplying water during the first trimester of pregnancy was identified on the basis of mother's address: DBPs data, technical and structural information were linked to each subject. RESULTS: Overall, THMs exposure was very low (mean: 3.8±3.6 μg/l), and no risk excess was observed. Chlorite and chlorate values were fairly high (mean: 427±184 μg/l and 283±79 μg/l, respectively). Women exposed to chlorite level >700 μg/l were at higher risk of newborns with renal defects (OR: 3.30; 95% IC: 1.35-8.09), abdominal wall defects (OR: 6.88; 95% IC: 1.67-28.33) and cleft palate (OR: 4.1; 95% IC: 0.98-16.8); women exposed to chlorate level >200 μg/l were at higher risk of newborns with obstructive urinary defects (OR: 2.88; 95% IC: 1.09-7.63), cleft palate (OR: 9.60; 95% IC:1.04-88.9) and spina bifida (OR: 4.94; 95% IC:1.10-22). CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study showing an excess risk of different congenital anomalies related to chlorite and chlorate exposure via drinking water: further research is needed to confirm the observed relationships in large datasets, specifically for chlorate, an unregulated DBP.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence of an association between disinfection by-products (DBPs) exposure via drinking water and reproductive outcomes is still inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between trihalomethanes (THMs), chlorite and chlorate exposure and congenital anomalies. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out in Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). Data on 1917 different congenital anomalies (neural tube, cardiac, diaphragm and abdominal wall, oesophagus, cleft lip and palate, respiratory, urinary tract and chromosomal anomalies) observed in the period 2002-2005 were extracted from the Regional Malformation Registry. Four controls (newborns without anomalies) were randomly selected form the Regional Birth Register and frequency matched to cases according to pregnancy period. The network supplying water during the first trimester of pregnancy was identified on the basis of mother's address: DBPs data, technical and structural information were linked to each subject. RESULTS: Overall, THMs exposure was very low (mean: 3.8±3.6 μg/l), and no risk excess was observed. Chlorite and chlorate values were fairly high (mean: 427±184 μg/l and 283±79 μg/l, respectively). Women exposed to chlorite level >700 μg/l were at higher risk of newborns with renal defects (OR: 3.30; 95% IC: 1.35-8.09), abdominal wall defects (OR: 6.88; 95% IC: 1.67-28.33) and cleft palate (OR: 4.1; 95% IC: 0.98-16.8); women exposed to chlorate level >200 μg/l were at higher risk of newborns with obstructive urinary defects (OR: 2.88; 95% IC: 1.09-7.63), cleft palate (OR: 9.60; 95% IC:1.04-88.9) and spina bifida (OR: 4.94; 95% IC:1.10-22). CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study showing an excess risk of different congenital anomalies related to chlorite and chlorate exposure via drinking water: further research is needed to confirm the observed relationships in large datasets, specifically for chlorate, an unregulated DBP.
Authors: Pablo Fernández-Navarro; Cristina M Villanueva; Javier García-Pérez; Elena Boldo; Fernando Goñi-Irigoyen; Enrique Ulibarrena; Panu Rantakokko; Esther García-Esquinas; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Marina Pollán; Nuria Aragonés Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Laura Avagliano; Valentina Massa; Timothy M George; Sarah Qureshy; Gaetano Pietro Bulfamante; Richard H Finnell Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm; Dora Cserbik; Cintia Flores; Maria J Farré; Josep Sanchís; Jose A Alcolea; Carles Planas; Josep Caixach; Cristina M Villanueva Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 6.371
Authors: Azra Dad; Clara H Jeong; Justin A Pals; Elizabeth D Wagner; Michael J Plewa Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: John A Kaufman; J Michael Wright; Amanda Evans; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Amy Meyer; Michael G Narotsky Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Cristina M Villanueva; Manolis Kogevinas; Sylvaine Cordier; Michael R Templeton; Roel Vermeulen; John R Nuckols; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Patrick Levallois Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Peter Weyer; Anthony Rhoads; Jonathan Suhl; Thomas J Luben; Kristin M Conway; Peter H Langlois; Dereck Shen; Dong Liang; Soman Puzhankara; Marlene Anderka; Erin Bell; Marcia L Feldkamp; Adrienne T Hoyt; Bridget Mosley; Jennita Reefhuis; Paul A Romitti Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Andrew J Copp; N Scott Adzick; Lyn S Chitty; Jack M Fletcher; Grayson N Holmbeck; Gary M Shaw Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 52.329