Literature DB >> 27981479

Chemical quality of tap water in Madrid: multicase control cancer study in Spain (MCC-Spain).

Pablo Fernández-Navarro1,2,3, Cristina M Villanueva4,5,6,7, Javier García-Pérez8,4,9, Elena Boldo8,4,9, Fernando Goñi-Irigoyen4,10,11, Enrique Ulibarrena4,10, Panu Rantakokko12, Esther García-Esquinas4,13, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez8,4,9, Marina Pollán8,4,9, Nuria Aragonés8,4,9.   

Abstract

Chronic consumption of water, which contains contaminants, may give rise to adverse health effects. The Madrid region, covered by the population-based multicase-control (MCC-Spain) study, includes two drinking water supply areas. The different sources of the water, coupled together with the possible differences in water management, mean that there may be differences in drinking water quality. In the context of the MCC study, our aims were to describe contaminant concentrations in tap water drawn from various sampling points distributed around the region, assess these concentrations by reference to guideline values and study possible differences between the two supply areas. Tap water samples were collected from 34 sampling points in 7 towns in the Madrid region (19-29 April 2010), and 23 contaminants (metals, nitrates, disinfection by-product and Mutagen X levels) were quantified. We undertook a descriptive analysis of the contaminant concentrations in the water and compared them between the two water supply areas (Wilcoxon test). We created maps representing the distribution of the concentrations observed at water sampling points and assessed the correlations (Spearman's coefficient) between the different parameters measured. The concentrations of the contaminants were below guideline values. There were differences between the two supply areas in concentration of nitrates (p value = 0.0051) and certain disinfection by-products. While there were positive correlations (rho >0.70) among some disinfection by-products, no correlations were found in metals or nitrates. The differences in nitrate levels could be linked to differences in farming/industrial activities in the catchment areas and in disinfection by-products might be related to the existence of different treatment systems or bromine content in source waters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disinfection by-products; MCC-Spain; Madrid; Nitrates; Tap water; Water pollutants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27981479     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8203-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

Review 1.  Carcinogens in drinking water: the epidemiologic evidence.

Authors:  Kenneth P Cantor
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.458

2.  Environmental and urinary markers of prenatal exposure to drinking water disinfection by-products, fetal growth, and duration of gestation in the PELAGIE birth cohort (Brittany, France, 2002-2006).

Authors:  Nathalie Costet; Ronan Garlantézec; Christine Monfort; Florence Rouget; Bertrand Gagnière; Cécile Chevrier; Sylvaine Cordier
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Non-agricultural sources of groundwater nitrate: a review and case study.

Authors:  Fernando T Wakida; David N Lerner
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Water disinfection by-products and bladder cancer: is there a European specificity? A pooled and meta-analysis of European case-control studies.

Authors:  N Costet; C M Villanueva; J J K Jaakkola; M Kogevinas; K P Cantor; W D King; C F Lynch; M J Nieuwenhuijsen; S Cordier
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  Arsenic exposure and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence.

Authors:  Ana Navas-Acien; A Richey Sharrett; Ellen K Silbergeld; Brian S Schwartz; Keeve E Nachman; Thomas A Burke; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Spatial and temporal evaluations of disinfection by-products in drinking water distribution systems in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Jianrong Wei; Bixiong Ye; Wuyi Wang; Linsheng Yang; Jing Tao; Zhiyu Hang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Nitrate, arsenic and chloride pollution of drinking water in Northern Greece. Elaboration by applying GIS.

Authors:  Konstantinos Fytianos; Christophoros Christophoridis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Arsenic exposure and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in US adults.

Authors:  Ana Navas-Acien; Ellen K Silbergeld; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Nitrate intake from drinking water on Tenerife island (Spain).

Authors:  J M Caballero Mesa; C Rubio Armendáriz; A Hardisson de la Torre
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-01-20       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 10.  Drinking water disinfection byproducts: review and approach to toxicity evaluation.

Authors:  G A Boorman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.