Literature DB >> 16909237

Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model.

Ludwig Huber1, Gyula K Gajdon.   

Abstract

The ability to act on information flexibly is one of the cornerstones of intelligent behavior. As particularly informative example, tool-oriented behavior has been investigated to determine to which extent nonhuman animals understand means-end relations, object affordances, and have specific motor skills. Even planning with foresight, goal-directed problem solving and immediate causal inference have been a focus of research. However, these cognitive abilities may not be restricted to tool-using animals but may be found also in animals that show high levels of curiosity, object exploration and manipulation, and extractive foraging behavior. The kea, a New Zealand parrot, is a particularly good example. We here review findings from laboratory experiments and field observations of keas revealing surprising cognitive capacities in the physical domain. In an experiment with captive keas, the success rate of individuals that were allowed to observe a trained conspecific was significantly higher than that of naive control subjects due to their acquisition of some functional understanding of the task through observation. In a further experiment using the string-pulling task, a well-probed test for means-end comprehension, we found the keas finding an immediate solution that could not be improved upon in nine further trials. We interpreted their performance as insightful in the sense of being sensitive of the relevant functional properties of the task and thereby producing a new adaptive response without trial-and-error learning. Together, these findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the distribution of higher cognitive skills in the animal kingdom by showing high levels of sensorimotor intelligence in animals that do not use tools. In conclusion, we suggest that the 'Technical intelligence hypothesis' (Byrne, Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations, pp 289-211, 1997), which has been proposed to explain the origin of the ape/monkey grade-shift in intelligence by a selection pressure upon an increased efficiency in foraging behavior, should be extended, that is, applied to some birds as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16909237     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0033-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  38 in total

Review 1.  'Captivity bias' in animal tool use and its implications for the evolution of hominin technology.

Authors:  Michael Haslam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cognition, personality, and stress in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus.

Authors:  Angela Medina-García; Jodie M Jawor; Timothy F Wright
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Vision, touch and object manipulation in Senegal parrots Poicephalus senegalus.

Authors:  Zoe P Demery; Jackie Chappell; Graham R Martin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The reluctant innovator: orangutans and the phylogeny of creativity.

Authors:  C P van Schaik; J Burkart; L Damerius; S I F Forss; K Koops; M A van Noordwijk; C Schuppli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Innovativeness as an emergent property: a new alignment of comparative and experimental research on animal innovation.

Authors:  Andrea S Griffin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain.

Authors:  Seweryn Olkowicz; Martin Kocourek; Radek K Lučan; Michal Porteš; W Tecumseh Fitch; Suzana Herculano-Houzel; Pavel Němec
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; Gesche Westphal-Fitch; Ulrike Aust; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity.

Authors:  Daniel Frynta; Silvie Lisková; Sebastian Bültmann; Hynek Burda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) can learn to attend to connectivity in string pulling tasks.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Corsin Müller; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  What you see is what you get? Exclusion performances in ravens and keas.

Authors:  Christian Schloegl; Anneke Dierks; Gyula K Gajdon; Ludwig Huber; Kurt Kotrschal; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.