Literature DB >> 22573413

Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties.

Florian Birnbaum1, Antonia Wiggermann, Philip C Maier, Daniel Böhringer, Thomas Reinhard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative astigmatism following penetrating keratoplasty is a major problem after corneal transplantation. The main goal of new trephination techniques such as femtosecond laser or excimer-laser trephination is to improve refractive and visual outcomes. The femtosecond laser technique makes profiled corneal trephinations such as the top hat or mushroom profile possible. We present the postoperative outcome of femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties.
METHODS: We performed 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties in 119 patients. The main outcome measures were intraoperative specifics, astigmatism, and irregularity in Orbscan corneal topography, as well as the occurrence of immune reactions and side-effects.
RESULTS: All sutures have been removed in 49 of these 123 eyes. Their mean follow-up was 13.9 ± 4.5 months. Time to complete suture removal (n = 49) was 12.0 ± 3.7 months in the mushroom group and 9.8 ± 2.1 months in the top hat group. Mean astigmatism in Orbscan topography was 6.4 ± 3.0 diopters in the mushroom and 5.8 ± 4.6 diopters in the top hat group (all sutures out).
CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty is a safe surgical technique. Due to the steps in profiled trephinations, the wound area is larger and theoretically the wound healing is, thus, faster and more stable. Complete suture removal is possible at an earlier time point compared to conventional penetrating keratoplasty. However, refractive results are not superior to those following conventional trephination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573413     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2054-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  44 in total

1.  Femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty: stability evaluation of different wound configurations.

Authors:  Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Penny McAllum; David Rootman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating re-keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted sutures.

Authors:  V Filatov; G Alexandrakis; J H Talamo; R F Steinert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  [Regression analysis of idiopathic endothelial cell loss after perforating normal risk keratoplasty: basic principles for long-term analysis of endothelial risk factors in a retrospective clinical study].

Authors:  D Böhringer; T Reinhard; E Godehardt; R Sundmacher
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Three-year clinical outcome after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with the guided trephine system.

Authors:  I Ruhswurm; U Scholz; T Pfleger; M Zehetmayer; G Hanselmayer; C Skorpik
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Femtosecond laser-assisted inverted mushroom keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yanny Y Y Cheng; Nayyirih G Tahzib; Gabriel van Rij; Hugo van Cleynenbreugel; Elisabeth Pels; Fred Hendrikse; Rudy Nuijts
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Femtosecond laser-assisted mushroom configuration deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Clara C Chan; Rusty J Ritenour; Nikhil L Kumar; Wiwan Sansanayudh; David S Rootman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Role of the suture technique.

Authors:  J N Murta; L Amaro; C Tavares; J B Mira
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zig-zag incision versus conventional blade trephination.

Authors:  Marjan Farid; Roger F Steinert; Ronald N Gaster; Winston Chamberlain; Amy Lin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  [Surgical correction of astigmatism after perforating keratoplasty].

Authors:  T Reinhard; R Sundmacher; H Greber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.059

View more
  17 in total

1.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; D Böhringer; P Eberwein; T Reinhard; P Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Prophylaxis and management of complications in penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  B Seitz; M El-Husseiny; A Langenbucher; N Szentmáry
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [DALK and penetrating laser keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus].

Authors:  B Seitz; C Cursiefen; M El-Husseiny; A Viestenz; A Langenbucher; N Szentmáry
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Endothelial cell density and corneal graft thickness following excimer laser vs. femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty-a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Gábor Tóth; Teona Butskhrikidze; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher; Tobias Hager; Elina Akhmedova; Moatasem El-Husseiny; Nóra Szentmáry
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  [Perforating keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in the partner eye: Functional results and patient satisfaction].

Authors:  N J Gross; D Böhringer; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted mushroom-configuration keratoplasty in advanced keratoconus.

Authors:  S S M Fung; F Aiello; V Maurino
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 7.  [Update: Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus. When, how and why].

Authors:  C Cursiefen; F Schaub; B Bachmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Excimer versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus and Fuchs Dystrophy: Intraoperative Pitfalls.

Authors:  Moatasem El-Husseiny; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher; Elena Akhmedova; Nora Szentmary; Tobias Hager; Themistoklis Tsintarakis; Edgar Janunts
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Analysis of the changes in keratoplasty indications and preferred techniques.

Authors:  Stefan J Lang; Mona Bischoff; Daniel Böhringer; Berthold Seitz; Thomas Reinhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  First experience with the new high-frequency femtosecond laser system (LDV Z8) for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Bojan Pajic; Iraklis Vastardis; Zisis Gatzioufas; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.