Literature DB >> 19646760

Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zig-zag incision versus conventional blade trephination.

Marjan Farid1, Roger F Steinert, Ronald N Gaster, Winston Chamberlain, Amy Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual outcomes and astigmatism in patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with 2 different incision techniques.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of a consecutive surgical series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent PK at the University of California, Irvine, academic referral practice.
METHODS: A comparison of 49 eyes of 43 patients that underwent femtosecond laser zig-zag incision pattern PK versus 17 eyes of 14 patients that underwent conventional Barron suction trephination PK performed contemporaneously. All PKs were closed with an identical, 24-bite running nylon suture technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Topographically determined astigmatism, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and recovery of full visual potential.
RESULTS: The postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 to 12 months. There was a significant difference in average astigmatism between the groups at postoperative month 1 (P = 0.013) and 3 (P = 0.018). By month 3, the average astigmatism was 3 diopters (D) in the zig-zag group and 4.46 D in the conventional group. Of the patients with normal macular and optic nerve function (n(ZZ) = 32; n(con) = 14), a significant difference in BSCVA was seen at month 1 (P = 0.0003) and month 3 (P = 0.006) with 81% of the zig-zag group versus 45% of the conventional group achieving BSCVA of > or =20/40 by month 3 (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The femtosecond laser generated zig-zag-shaped incision results in a more rapid recovery of BSCVA and induces less astigmatism compared with conventional blade trephination PK. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19646760     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Perspectives of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Birnbaum; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Perspectives of laser-assisted keratoplasty: current overview and first preliminary results with the picosecond infrared laser (λ = 3 µm)].

Authors:  S J Linke; L Ren; A Frings; J Steinberg; W Wöllmer; T Katz; R Reimer; N O Hansen; N Jowett; G Richard; R J Dwayne Miller
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Evolving Techniques in Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2015-02-01

4.  In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of corneal wound healing after femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty.

Authors:  Roni M Shtein; Kurt H Kelley; David C Musch; Alan Sugar; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2012-02-16

5.  Femtosecond-UVA-riboflavin (FUR) cross-linking approach to penetrating keratoplasty and anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Guillermo Rocha; Michael Butler; Andrea Butler; Joanne M Hackett
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-30

6.  Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted mushroom-configuration keratoplasty in advanced keratoconus.

Authors:  S S M Fung; F Aiello; V Maurino
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Penetrating keratoplasty using femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty with zig-zag incisions versus a mechanical trephine in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Ronald N Gaster; Oanna Dumitrascu; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties.

Authors:  Florian Birnbaum; Antonia Wiggermann; Philip C Maier; Daniel Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Excimer versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus and Fuchs Dystrophy: Intraoperative Pitfalls.

Authors:  Moatasem El-Husseiny; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher; Elena Akhmedova; Nora Szentmary; Tobias Hager; Themistoklis Tsintarakis; Edgar Janunts
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 10.  The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Antonis Aristeidou; Elise V Taniguchi; Michael Tsatsos; Rodrigo Muller; Colm McAlinden; Roberto Pineda; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.