Literature DB >> 18580260

Femtosecond laser-assisted inverted mushroom keratoplasty.

Yanny Y Y Cheng1, Nayyirih G Tahzib, Gabriel van Rij, Hugo van Cleynenbreugel, Elisabeth Pels, Fred Hendrikse, Rudy Nuijts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive outcome, corneal topography, optical coherence tomography, and endothelial cell density 12 months after femtosecond laser-assisted inverted mushroom keratoplasty.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of a surgical case series of 5 patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted inverted mushroom keratoplasty for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy or pre-Descemet X-linked ichthyosis. The femtosecond laser was used to create a top-hat configuration in the donor cornea and recipient cornea. Laser parameters were as follows: energy, 4.0 (anterior inner vertical side cut and horizontal lamellar cut) and 7.0 microJ (posterior outer vertical side cut); spiral pattern with a firing rate of 15 kHz. The size of the anterior inner diameter was 7.4 mm in the donor cornea and 7.0 mm in the recipient cornea. The posterior outer diameter was 9.0 mm in all eyes.
RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months after surgery, all corneal grafts were clear and showed an excellent adaptation of the lamellar donor and recipient wound surfaces. At 12 months postoperatively, BCVA averaged 20/32 (range, 20/60-20/20), refractive cylinder averaged -3.20 +/- 2.0 D, topographical cylinder averaged 3.26 +/- 2.1 D, and the mean endothelial cell density was 1793 +/- 491 cells/mm2 (range, 954-2237 cells/mm2). The mean central corneal thickness and thickness of the posterior shelf was 517 +/- 3 and 175 +/- 8 microm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The femtosecond laser-assisted inverted mushroom keratoplasty shows good promise in surgical treatment of corneal diseases. The multiplanar fit between the donor and recipient cornea allows early suture removal and visual rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18580260     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31815bad0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  7 in total

1.  [Postkeratoplasty astigmatism: comparison of three suturing techniques].

Authors:  I Naydis; M Klemm; A Hassenstein; G Richard; T Katz; S J Linke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Birnbaum; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Keratoplasty: laminate or penetrate? Part 1: penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties.

Authors:  Florian Birnbaum; Antonia Wiggermann; Philip C Maier; Daniel Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Excimer versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus and Fuchs Dystrophy: Intraoperative Pitfalls.

Authors:  Moatasem El-Husseiny; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher; Elena Akhmedova; Nora Szentmary; Tobias Hager; Themistoklis Tsintarakis; Edgar Janunts
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Clinical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty performed with the VisuMax femtosecond laser system and comparison with conventional penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Hidenaga Kobashi; Kimiya Shimizu; Akihito Igarashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shen; Lester Tsai; Hannah Muniz Castro; Matthew Wade; Marjan Farid
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.