Literature DB >> 22570224

Identifying alignment parameters affecting implanted patellofemoral mechanics.

Clare K Fitzpatrick1, Mark A Baldwin, Chadd W Clary, Abraham Wright, Peter J Laz, Paul J Rullkoetter.   

Abstract

Complications of the patellofemoral (PF) joint remain a common cause for revision of total knee replacements. PF complications, such as patellar maltracking, subluxation, and implant failure, have been linked to femoral and patellar component alignment. In this study, a dynamic finite element model of an implanted PF joint was applied in conjunction with a probabilistic simulation to establish relationships between alignment parameters and PF kinematics, contact mechanics, and internal stresses. Both traditional sensitivity analysis and a coupled probabilistic and principal component analysis approach were applied to characterize relationships between implant alignment and resulting joint mechanics. Critical alignment parameters, and combinations of parameters, affecting PF mechanics were identified for three patellar designs (dome, modified dome, and anatomic). Femoral internal-external (I-E) alignment was identified as a critical alignment factor for all component designs, influencing medial-lateral contact force and anterior-posterior translation. The anatomic design was sensitive to patellar flexion-extension (F-E) alignment, while the dome, as expected, was less influenced by rotational alignment, and more by translational position. The modified dome was sensitive to a combination of superior-inferior, F-E, and I-E alignments. Understanding the relationships and design-specific dependencies between alignment parameters can aid preoperative planning, and help focus instrumentation design on those alignment parameters of primary concern.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22570224     DOI: 10.1002/jor.22055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  The importance of the third knee compartment on outcome following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The linea aspera as a rotational landmark: an anatomical MRI-based study.

Authors:  Gustavo Reple; Arnaud Felden; Antoine Feydy; Philippe Anract; David Biau
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Surrogate modeling of deformable joint contact using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Effect on patellar kinematics of the different patellar component designs in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative measurement of dome type versus anatomic type.

Authors:  Takeshi Mochizuki; Koichiro Yano; Katsunori Ikari; Ryo Hiroshima; Ken Okazaki
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-10-26

6.  Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maeruan Kebbach; Martin Darowski; Sven Krueger; Christoph Schilling; Thomas M Grupp; Rainer Bader; Andreas Geier
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  The Design of the Patellar Component Does Not Affect the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Oog-Jin Shon; Gi Beom Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.