BACKGROUND: Detailed information about how patients with head and neck carcinoma (HNC) are treated across practice settings does not exist. The authors conducted a prospective, observational study to examine the patterns of care for a series of patients with newly diagnosed HNC in the United States and to test 2 hypotheses: 1) There is no difference in the pattern of care between community and academic settings; and 2) the results of major randomized clinical trials will change the pattern of care in both practice settings within 1 year of publication in peer-reviewed journals. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years were enrolled in the Longitudinal Oncology Registry of Head and Neck Carcinoma (LORHAN) after providing written informed consent if they had a confirmed diagnosis of new HNC and were scheduled to receive treatment other than surgery alone. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2010, 100 centers enrolled 4243 patients, including 2612 patients (62%) from academic investigators and 1631 patients (38%) from community centers. Initial treatments were radiation with concurrent chemotherapy (30%) or cetuximab (9%), adjuvant radiotherapy (21%), induction chemotherapy (16%), and other (24%). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was the dominant radiation technique (84%). Single-agent cisplatin was prescribed in nearly half of patients and more often in academic centers (53% vs 43% of patients; P < .0001). Single-agent cetuximab was the next most common drug used (19%) and was prescribed more frequently in community settings (24% vs 17%; P = .0001). The data rejected the 2 prospective hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: LORHAN documented differences in patient characteristics and treatments between community and academic settings for a large series of patients in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Detailed information about how patients with head and neck carcinoma (HNC) are treated across practice settings does not exist. The authors conducted a prospective, observational study to examine the patterns of care for a series of patients with newly diagnosed HNC in the United States and to test 2 hypotheses: 1) There is no difference in the pattern of care between community and academic settings; and 2) the results of major randomized clinical trials will change the pattern of care in both practice settings within 1 year of publication in peer-reviewed journals. METHODS:Patients aged ≥ 18 years were enrolled in the Longitudinal Oncology Registry of Head and Neck Carcinoma (LORHAN) after providing written informed consent if they had a confirmed diagnosis of new HNC and were scheduled to receive treatment other than surgery alone. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2010, 100 centers enrolled 4243 patients, including 2612 patients (62%) from academic investigators and 1631 patients (38%) from community centers. Initial treatments were radiation with concurrent chemotherapy (30%) or cetuximab (9%), adjuvant radiotherapy (21%), induction chemotherapy (16%), and other (24%). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was the dominant radiation technique (84%). Single-agent cisplatin was prescribed in nearly half of patients and more often in academic centers (53% vs 43% of patients; P < .0001). Single-agent cetuximab was the next most common drug used (19%) and was prescribed more frequently in community settings (24% vs 17%; P = .0001). The data rejected the 2 prospective hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: LORHAN documented differences in patient characteristics and treatments between community and academic settings for a large series of patients in the United States.
Authors: Gene-Fu F Liu; Mark C Ranck; Abhishek A Solanki; Hongyuan Cao; Antonia Kolokythas; Barry L Wenig; Lucy Chen; Stephanie Ard; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Howard Halpern; Michael T Spiotto Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Felipe A Retes; Fabio S Kawaguti; Marcelo S de Lima; Bruno da Costa Martins; Ricardo S Uemura; Gustavo A de Paulo; Caterina Mp Pennacchi; Carla Gusmon; Adriana Vs Ribeiro; Elisa R Baba; Sebastian N Geiger; Mauricio P Sorbello; Marco A Kulcsar; Ulysses Ribeiro; Fauze Maluf-Filho Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Stefan Hartmann; Leonie Zwick; Mario J J Scheurer; Andreas R Fuchs; Roman C Brands; Axel Seher; Hartmut Böhm; Alexander C Kübler; Urs D A Müller-Richter Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2017-10-15 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Jiayi Huang; Andrew M Baschnagel; Peter Chen; Gregory Gustafson; Ishmael Jaiyesmi; Mitchell Folbe; Hong Ye; Jan Akervall; Daniel Krauss Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Tim N Beck; Rachel Georgopoulos; Elena I Shagisultanova; David Sarcu; Elizabeth A Handorf; Cara Dubyk; Miriam N Lango; John A Ridge; Igor Astsaturov; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Barbara A Burtness; Ranee Mehra; Erica A Golemis Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Julie E Bauman; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Sufi Thomas; William E Gooding; David A Clump; Brian Karlovits; Ahmad Wehbe; Frank R Miller; Seungwon Kim; Malabika Sen; Dwight E Heron; Jennifer R Grandis; Athanassios Argiris Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jeremiah Holt; Vonn Walter; Xiaoying Yin; David Marron; Matthew D Wilkerson; Hyo Young Choi; Xiaobei Zhao; Heejoon Jo; David Neil Hayes; Yoon Ho Ko Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 13.801