Literature DB >> 22569787

A Cross-cultural study of recovery for people with psychiatric disabilities between U.S. and Japan.

Sadaaki Fukui1, Yuka Shimizu, Charles A Rapp.   

Abstract

The concept of recovery has been expanding overseas with remarkable speed. The Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) is one of the measures widely used to capture self-perceptions of a sense of recovery for people with psychiatric disabilities. The current study tested measurement invariance of RAS between the US and Japanese samples for people with psychiatric disabilities, which is a precursor of further cross-cultural comparisons without any contamination of systematic cultural bias. A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis was applied to US (N = 446) and Japanese (N = 214) participants for testing configural, loading, and intercept invariance. The results revealed that RAS items equally captured their associated recovery domains between American and Japanese participants. For two domains, "personal confidence and hope" and "reliance on others," the two groups systematically responded with different patterns. Different cultural environments may have additive influences toward people's response patterns to their recovery across countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22569787     DOI: 10.1007/s10597-012-9513-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Ment Health J        ISSN: 0010-3853


  18 in total

1.  Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: do Easterners really expect the worst and Westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events?

Authors:  E C Chang; K Asakawa; L J Sanna
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-09

2.  Recovery from schizophrenia: a concept in search of research.

Authors:  Robert Paul Liberman; Alex Kopelowicz
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Michael W Browne; Li Cai
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-03

4.  When does measurement invariance matter?

Authors:  Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Recovery: an international perspective.

Authors:  Mike Slade; Michaela Amering; Lindsay Oades
Journal:  Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

6.  A long-term follow-up study of schizophrenia: psychiatric course of illness and prognosis.

Authors:  G Huber; G Gross; R Schüttler
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 6.392

7.  Long-term outcome of major psychoses. I. Schizophrenia and affective disorders compared with psychiatrically symptom-free surgical conditions.

Authors:  M T Tsuang; R F Woolson; J A Fleming
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1979-11

8.  Testing the validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale using an Australian sample.

Authors:  Mandy McNaught; Peter Caputi; Lindsay G Oades; Frank P Deane
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.744

9.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.

Authors:  Rie Chiba; Yuki Miyamoto; Norito Kawakami
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.837

10.  The influence of ethnicity and family structure on relapse in first-episode schizophrenia. A comparison of Asian, Afro-Caribbean, and white patients.

Authors:  M Birchwood; R Cochrane; F Macmillan; S Copestake; J Kucharska; M Carriss
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  4 in total

1.  The property of the Japanese version of the Recovery Knowledge Inventory (RKI) among mental health service providers: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Rie Chiba; Maki Umeda; Kyohei Goto; Yuki Miyamoto; Sosei Yamaguchi; Norito Kawakami
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2017-12-28

2.  Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of strengths model case management (SMCM) with Chinese mental health service users in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Samson Tse; Sau Man Catalina Ng; Wing Yan Winnie Yuen; Sadaaki Fukui; Richard J Goscha; Wann Ka Iris Lo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Validation of the 24-item recovery assessment scale-revised (RAS-R) in the Norwegian language and context: a multi-centre study.

Authors:  Eva Biringer; Marit Tjoflåt
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing.

Authors:  Akiko Kanehara; Risa Kotake; Yuki Miyamoto; Yousuke Kumakura; Kentaro Morita; Tomoko Ishiura; Kimiko Shimizu; Yumiko Fujieda; Shuntaro Ando; Shinsuke Kondo; Kiyoto Kasai
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.