Literature DB >> 11554648

Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: do Easterners really expect the worst and Westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events?

E C Chang1, K Asakawa, L J Sanna.   

Abstract

The authors compared levels of optimistic and pessimistic bias in the prediction of positive and negative life events between European Americans and Japanese. Study 1 showed that European Americans compared with Japanese were more likely to predict positive events to occur to self than to others. The opposite pattern emerged in the prediction of negative events. Study 2 replicated these cultural differences. Furthermore, positive associations emerged between predictions and occurrence of life events 2 months later for both European Americans and Japanese. Across both studies, results of within-groups analyses indicated that both groups expected negative events to be more likely to occur to others than to self (optimistic bias). In addition, Japanese expected positive events to be more likely to occur to others than to self (pessimistic bias). However, European Americans failed to show the expected optimistic bias for positive events.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11554648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

1.  Subjective invulnerability, optimism bias and adjustment in emerging adulthood.

Authors:  Daniel K Lapsley; Patrick L Hill
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2009-04-16

2.  Age differences in dispositional optimism: a cross-cultural study.

Authors:  Jin You; Helene H L Fung; Derek M Isaacowitz
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2009-10-08

3.  A Cross-cultural study of recovery for people with psychiatric disabilities between U.S. and Japan.

Authors:  Sadaaki Fukui; Yuka Shimizu; Charles A Rapp
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-05-09

4.  Modelling psychological responses to the Great East Japan earthquake and nuclear incident.

Authors:  Robin Goodwin; Masahito Takahashi; Shaojing Sun; Stanley O Gaines
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Knowing where to draw the line: perceptual differences between risk-takers and non-risk-takers.

Authors:  Adam T Biggs; Paul C Stey; Christopher C Davoli; Daniel Lapsley; James R Brockmole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Unrealistic comparative optimism: An unsuccessful search for evidence of a genuinely motivational bias.

Authors:  Adam J L Harris; Laura de Molière; Melinda Soh; Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceived threat, risk perception, and efficacy beliefs related to SARS and other (emerging) infectious diseases: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Onno de Zwart; Irene K Veldhuijzen; Gillian Elam; Arja R Aro; Thomas Abraham; George D Bishop; Hélène A C M Voeten; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-01-06

8.  Optimism/pessimism and health-related quality of life during pregnancy across three continents: a matched cohort study in China, Ghana, and the United States.

Authors:  Cheryl A Moyer; Huixia Yang; Yao Kwawukume; Anu Gupta; YuChun Zhu; Isaac Koranteng; Yasmin Elsayed; YuMei Wei; Jonathan Greene; Cecilia Calhoun; Geraldine Ekpo; Megan Beems; Megan Ryan; Richard Adanu; Frank Anderson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Unrealistic optimism: East and west?

Authors:  Mary Sissons Joshi; Wakefield Carter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-13

10.  Sources of information and health beliefs related to SARS and avian influenza among Chinese communities in the United Kingdom and The Netherlands, compared to the general population in these countries.

Authors:  Helene A C M Voeten; Onno de Zwart; Irene K Veldhuijzen; Cicely Yuen; Xinyi Jiang; Gillian Elam; Thomas Abraham; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-01-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.